Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:14:52.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The improvement of bracken dominated hill pasture using herbicides, reseeding, fertilizers and cutting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Farnworth  and
G. M. Davies
J. Farnworth
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
G. M. Davies
Affiliation:
University College of North Wales, Bangor
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Bracken-dominated hill pasture was treated with combinations of bracken and pasture herbicides and two reseeding techniques against a background of fertilization and liming. Picloram and dicamba gave high levels of bracken control and reduced carbohydrate levels in the rhizome. Both paraquat or reseeding with minimal cultivations increased yield of digestible organic matter by reducing competition from native weed grass species and promoting better establishment of ryegrass.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 3 , December 1974 , pp. 557 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Braid, K. W. (1959). Bracken. A review of the literature. Mimeograph Publication No. 3. Commonwealth Bureau of Pasture and Field Crops, 1–69.Google Scholar
Crampton, C. B. (1967). The evolution of soils on the hills of South Wales and factors affecting their distribution and their past, present and potential use. Report of the Welsh Soils Discussion Group No. 8, 52–67.Google Scholar
Davies, G. M. (1968). The use of fertilizers and paraquat on a hill sward. Proc. Symp. Hill Land Productivity. European Grassland Federation, 141–5.Google Scholar
Farnworth, J. (1970). The use of picloram, dicamba and paraquat on bracken dominated hill pasture. Ph.D. thesis. University of Wales. 1, 49–51, 73–5.Google Scholar
Hodgson, G. L. (1964). Chemical control of bracken. Technical report of the A.R.C. Weed Research Organisation 3, 1–36.Google Scholar
Lawson, H. M. (1965). Chemical control of bracken fern in the British Isles with Tordan. Down to Earth 20, 13–15.Google Scholar
Lhoste, J., Vernie, F.. & Casanova, A. (1965). Contributions à l'etude de l'action du pichlorame sur Pteridium aquilinum L. Phtiatrie-Phytopharmacie 14, 1–9.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J. P. & Gleason, C. P. (1945). Rapid determination of starch. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 17, 134–6.Google Scholar
Rogers, H. H. & Whitmore, E. T. (1966). A modified method for the in vitro determination of herbage digestibility in plant breeding studies. Journal of the British Grassland Society 21, 150–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, R. K. (1967). Relationships between digestibility parameters. An Foras Taluntais. Animal Production Division Research Report. 1967, 129.Google Scholar