Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:25:04.859Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The importance of seed size in early growth of wild and domesticated cowpeas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. M. Lush
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.M.B. 5320 Ibadan, Nigeria
H. C. Wien
Affiliation:
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture, P.M.B. 5320 Ibadan, Nigeria

Summary

Domesticated cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) have larger seeds than their wild relatives. The effects of this increase in seed size on seedling emergence and growth were investigated. In shallow sowings, to 5 cm, seed size had no effect on emergence, but in deeper plantings ahigher proportion of the larger-seeded accessions emerged, and they emerged earlier than smaller-seeded accessions. The size of seedlings just after emergence was inversely related to depth of planting and directly related to seed size. The greater size of the seedlings of larger-seeded accessions was maintained until at least 40 days after sowing, despite the higher relative growth rates of smaller, wild seedlings. When compared at the same size there was no general difference in the growth rate of wild accessions and that of domesticates. During the evolution of domesticated cowpeas, large seeds have probably been advantageous because of their better emergence and establishment under agricultural conditions, and because of the greater size of plants arising from them.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Black, J. N. (1959). Seed size in herbage legumes. Herbage Abstracts 29, 235241.Google Scholar
Bremner, P. M., Eckersall, R. N. & Scott, R. K. (1963). The relative importance of embryo size and endosperm size in causing effects associated with seed size in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 61, 139145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burris, J. S., Edje, O. T., & Wahab, A. H. (1973). Effects of seed size on seed performance in soybeans: II. Seedling growth and photosynthesis and field performance. Crop Science 13, 207210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, W. G. & Hesketh, J. (1968). Net photosynthetic rates, relative leaf growth rates, and leaf numbers of 22 races of maize grown at eight temperatures. Crop Science 8, 670674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, C. J. & Hartwig, E. F. (1971). Effect of seed size upon rate of germination in soybeans. Agronomy Journal 63, 429430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T. & Dunstone, R. L. (1970). Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat. Australian Journal of Biological Science 23, 725741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harper, J. L. & Obeid, M. (1967). Influence of seed size and depth of sowing on the establishment and growth of varieties of fibre and oil seed flax. Crop Science 7, 527532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, E. H. & Rossiter, R. C. (1958). The influence of seed size and seeding rate on the growth of two strains of subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 9, 286293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lush, W. M. & Rawson, H. M. (1979). Effects of domestication and region of origin on leaf gas exchange in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.). Photosynthetica (in the Press).Google Scholar
Ries, S. K. (1971). The relationship of protein content and size of bean seed with growth and yield. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 96, 557560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmonds, N. W. (1976). Evolution of Crop Plants. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Verdcourt, B. (1970). Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionideae for the ‘Flora of tropical East Africa’. IV. Kew Bulletin 24, 507569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, Wilson J. (1972). Control of crop processes. In Crop Processes in Controlled Environments (ed. Rees, A. R., Cockshull, K. E., Hand, D. W. and Hurd, R. G.), pp. 730. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar