Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:24:34.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Hybridisation of Barleys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. H. Biffen
R. H. Biffen
Affiliation:
Agriculture Department, Cambridge University.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following experiments on the hybridisation of barley were commenced in 1901; consequently the inheritance of some of the characteristics has been known for some time. In view of the fact that from the earlier accounts of Rimpau and Tschermak the main outlines of the story could be traced without any special difficulty, there appeared to be no necessity for immediate publication. This was delayed, therefore, in order to complete the investigation of one or two doubtful points. The literature of barley-breeding published prior to the year 1900 is rather extensive, but of comparatively little interest to the modern student of heredity. The most important papers are those of Liebscher and Rimpau. That part of Rimpau's great paper, “Kreuzungprodukte Landwirtschaftliche Kulturpflanzen,” dealing with barley, is of exceptional interest on account of its extreme thoroughness and the completeness of the records it contains. As one reads it one cannot help thinking that Rimpau must have come very near to making an independent discovery of Mendel's laws of inheritance.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 2 , Issue 2 , April 1907 , pp. 183 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1907

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 183 note 1 Liebscher, , Bot. Centrb. Vol. XL. p. 232 (abstract).Google Scholar

page 183 note 2 Rimpau, , Landw. Jahrb. Vol. XX. p. 354. See also Wittmack, Ber. d. deut. Bot. Ges. IV. p. 434.Google Scholar

page 184 note 1 Beaven, , Journ. Jnst. of Brewing, Vol. VIII. p, 542.Google Scholar

page 185 note 1 Morton's, Cyclopaedia of Agriculture, 1869, p. 183.Google Scholar

page 186 note 1 Raciborski, Cf., Bot. Centrb. Vol. XC. p. 407 (abstract).Google Scholar

page 187 note 1 Detailed descriptions will be found in Körnicke and Werner in Bde. I. and II. of their Handbuch des Getreidebaues, Berlin, 1885, or in Körnicke, Die Hauptsachlichslen Formen der Saatgerste, Bonn, 1895.

page 188 note 1 Morton's, Cyclopaedia of Agriculture, 1869, p. 183.Google Scholar

page 189 note 1 Linnaeus, , Species Plantarum (1753), p. 85.Google Scholar

page 194 note 1 Rimpau, , Landw. Jahrb. Bd. XX. p. 356.Google Scholar

page 194 note 2 Tschermak, , Deutsche Landw. Presse, XXX. Nr. 82.Google Scholar

page 194 note 3 Wilson, , Journ. Agric. Sci. Vol. II. p. 86.Google Scholar

page 196 note 1 The most aberrant result met with so far is in the case of H. nigrescens × aethiops where the proportions are 24: 65: 26.

page 198 note 1 Rimpau, ibid.

page 198 note 2 Tschermak, ibid.

page 200 note 1 In H. himalayense coloured grain is found in conjunction with white or greyish-white paleae.

page 203 note 1 Cf. Liebscher, ibid.

page 206 note 1 Biffen, , Journ. Brew. Inst. Vol. XII. 1906, p. 344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar