Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:27:11.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Herbage production and tiller density in five related grasses, their hybrids and mixtures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. Wilman  and
Y. Gao
D. Wilman
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Welsh Institute of Rural Studies, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Dyfed SY23 3DD, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four grass species, three hybrids and three mixtures were grown in field swards near Aberystwyth. All swards were amply supplied with nutrients and were cut at 5-week intervals during the year of sowing (1989) and during the following 4 years. The order of the grasses in rate of establishment was: Westerwolds ryegrass > Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) > Italian ryegrass × perennial ryegrass, Italian ryegrass × meadow fescue, perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) > perennial ryegrass × meadow fescue, meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) > tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea). During the sowing year as a whole, Italian ryegrass was the highest yielding grass, followed by Westerwolds ryegrass. During the remaining period (1990–93), as a whole, the highest yields were obtained from perennial ryegrass sown alone or in a mixture with tall fescue. Tall fescue sown alone was one of the lowest yielding grasses in the year of sowing, but developed to be the highest yielding in 1992 and 1993. Westerwolds ryegrass persisted least well, although some plants did survive until 1992. Italian ryegrass persisted better than Westerwolds and Italian ryegrass × meadow fescue persisted better than Italian ryegrass. Hybrid ryegrass and perennial ryegrass × meadow fescue persisted satisfactorily but with fewer tillers/m2 than perennial ryegrass or tall fescue. The yield of tall fescue in March was as high as that of Italian ryegrass in 1990 and 1991 and higher than that of any of the other grasses in 1992 and 1993; the tiller density of tall fescue was particularly high in March. The yield of mixtures (Italian ryegrass with perennial ryegrass, Italian ryegrass with tall fescue and perennial ryegrass with tall fescue) was, on average, 2·5% more than the mean of the component species when sown alone. When grown with ryegrass, tall fescue was not prominent initially but its proportion in the sward gradually increased.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 127 , Issue 1 , August 1996 , pp. 57 - 65
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Charles, A. H. (1969). A comparison of the herbage yield of Italian ryegrass and tall fescue mixtures in the second and third year after sowing. Journal of the British Grassland Society 24, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frame, J. (1992). Improved Grassland Management. Ipswich: Farming Press.Google Scholar
Gao, Y. & Wilman, D. (1994). Leaf development in eight related grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 123, 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkess, R. D. (1970). Competition between tall fescue and perennial ryegrass in pure and mixed swards under simulated field conditions. Journal of Applied Ecology 7, 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milthorpe, F. L. (1961). The nature and analysis of competition between plants of different species. In Mechanisms in Biological Competition. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, No. 15. (Ed. Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 330–355. Cambridge: University Press.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1989). Recommended Varieties of Grasses and Herbage Legumes 1989/90. Farmers Leaflet No. 4. Cambridge: National Institute of Agricultural Botany.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1994). NIAB Recommended List of Grasses and Herbage Legumes 1994/95. Cambridge: National Institute of Agricultural Botany.Google Scholar
Rhodes, I. (1970). Competition between herbage grasses. Herbage Abstracts 40, 115–121.Google Scholar
Rudeforth, C. C. (1970). Soils of North Cardiganshire. Harpenden: Soil Survey of England and Wales.Google Scholar
Snaydon, R. W. (1987). The botanical composition of pastures. In Managed Grasslands: Analytical Studies. Ecosystems of the World, 17B. (Ed. Snaydon, R. W.), pp. 81–87. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Spedding, C. R. W. & Diekmahns, E. C. (Eds) (1972). Grasses and Legumes in British Agriculture. Bulletin no. 49, Commonwealth Bureau of Pastures and Field Crops. Farnham Royal: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Stapledon, R. G. & Milton, W. E. J. (1932). Yield, palatability and other studies on strains of various grass species. University College of Wales, Aberystwylh, Welsh Plant Breeding Station Series H, no. 13, pp. 1–79. Aberystwyth: Welsh Plant Breeding Station.Google Scholar
Thomas, H. & Humphreys, M. O. (1991). Progress and potential of interspecific hybrids of Lolium and Festuca. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 117, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilman, D., Gao, Y. & Michaud, P. J. (1994). Morphology and position of the shoot apex in some temperate grasses. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 122, 375–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar