Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T05:20:44.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth pattern and its effect on feed utilization of sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Murray  and
Olga Slezacek
D. M. Murray
Affiliation:
School of Wool and Pastoral Sciences, The University of New South Wales, Kensington
Olga Slezacek
Affiliation:
Hawkesbury Agricultural College, Richmond, New South Wales, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effect of three different growth patterns from 15 to 40 kg live weight on the feed utilization of lambs was studied. The treatments were: high (H) ad-libitum feed intake, low (L) restricted feed intake and high-maintenance-high (HMH) ad-libitum feed intake from 15 to 25 kg followed by a 50-day period during which live weight was maintained constant, which in turn was followed by ad-libitum feeding. Animals were individually penned and fed a pelleted lucerne chaff-cereal grain mixture. Intakes of pellets were converted to digestible organic matter (DOM) using the results of in-vitro digestion studies. Two animals were killed at the start of the experiment (15 kg) and the remaining 27 animals (nine in each treatment) were killed at common live weights of 25, 30, 35 and 40 kg.

A marked reduction was observed during weight stasis at 25 kg in the amount of DOM required daily by the HMH animals to maintain live weight. Despite marked compensatory growth by the HMH animals which were rehabilitated after the period of weight stasis, DOM intakes were similar in both these HMH animals and a corresponding number of H animals over identical live-weight ranges.

Differences between treatments were found in DOM intake per unit live-weight gain (H < HMH < L), empty body-weight gain (H = HMH < L) and carcass weight gain (H < HMH = L) from 15 kg until slaughter. DOM intake was utilized more efficiently for gains of all these components by HMH animals during compensatory growth compared with H animals over the same live-weight ranges.

DOM intakes were related to energy gains in the carcass both for all animals in each treatment from 15 kg until slaughter, and for the H and HMH animals which were killed at 30, 35 and 40 kg from 25 kg. Comparisons of these data showed treatment differences in the efficiency of DOM conversion to carcass energy (H > HMH > L) and that DOM was utilized no more efficiently by HMH animals during compensatory growth than by H animals over identical live-weight ranges.

It is concluded that the increased efficiency of utilization of DOM for carcass gain during compensatory growth was due to changes in carcass composition during the period of weight stasis.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 95 , Issue 2 , October 1980 , pp. 349 - 355
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allden, W. G. (1968). Undernutrition of the Merino sheep and its sequelae. 1. The growth and development of lambs following prolonged periods of nutritional stress. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 621–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Rook, J. A. F. (1953). The heat of combustion of the tissues of cattle in relation to their chemical composition. British Journal of Nutrition 7, 83–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drew, K. R. & Reid, J. T. (1975 a). Compensatory growth in immature sheep. 1. The effects of weight loss and realimentation on the whole body composition. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drew, K. R. & Reid, J. T. (1975 b). Compensatory growth in immature sheep. 3. Feed utilization by sheep subject to feed deprivation followed by realimentation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drori, D., Levy, D., Folman, Y. & Holzer, Z. (1974). Compensatory growth of intensively raised bull calves. 2. The effect of feed energy concentrations. Journal of Animal Science 38, 654–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliott, R. C. & O'donovan, W. M. (1969). Compensatory growth in Dorper sheep. In Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Animal Production, Salisbury, Rhodesia (ed. Oliver, J.), pp. 41–50.Google Scholar
Folman, Y., Drori, D., Holzer, Z. & Levy, D. (1974). Compensatory growth of intensively raised bull calves. 3. Restricted refeeding and breed differences. Journal of Animal Science 39, 788–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, N. McC. & Searle, T. W. (1975). Studies of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. 1. Energy and nitrogen utilization. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 343–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leche, T. F. (1971). Growth and feed conversion of Jersey and Friesian bulls in relation to plane of nutrition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 829–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. H. & Clawson, W. J. (1964). Undernutrition and subsequent rehabilitation in rats and sheep. Journal of Animal Science 23, 214–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M. (1971). Growth rate and body composition of cattle. Ph.D. thesis, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Murray, D. M. & Slezacek, O. (1975). The effect of growth rate on muscle distribution in sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 189–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M. & Slezacek, O. (1976). Growth rate and its effect on empty body weight, carcass weight and dissected carcass composition of sheep. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M. & Slezacek, O. (1979 a). Growth rate effects on the chemical composition of the carcass and muscle tissue of sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. M. & Slezacek, O. (1979 b). The effect of liveweight maintenance on dissected carcass composition of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia 4, 154.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., McDonald, I., Grubb, D. A. & Pennie, K. (1976). The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. 4. Effects on growth rate, food utilization and body composition of changing from a low to a high protein diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, T. W. & Graham, N. Mcc. (1975). Studies of weaner sheep during and after a period of weight stasis. 2. Body composition. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 355–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slezacek, O. (1976). Growth rate and body composition of lambs. M.Sc. thesis, University of New South Wales.Google Scholar