Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:43:45.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Growth of spring barley under drought: crop development, photosynthesis, dry-matter accumulation and nutrient content

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. W. Lawlor ,
W. Day ,
A. E. Johnston ,
B. J. Legg  and
K. J. Parkinson
D. W. Lawlor
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
W. Day
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
A. E. Johnston
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
B. J. Legg
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
K. J. Parkinson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts., AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of water deficit on growth of spring barley were analysed under five irrigation treatments. One crop was irrigated at weekly intervals from emergence throughout the growing season, and one was not irrigated at all after emergence. Soil water deficits in the other treatments were allowed to develop early, intermediate or late in the crop's development.

Weekly irrigation produced a crop with a large leaf area index (maximum value 4) and maintained green leaf and awns throughout the grain-filling period. Early drought decreased leaf area index (maximum value 2) by slowing expansion of main-stem leaves and decreasing the number and growth of tiller leaves. Leaf senescence was also increased with drought. Drought late in the development of ears and leaves and during the grain-filling period caused leaves and awns to senesce so that the total photosynthetic areas decreased faster than with irrigation. Photosynthetic rate per unit leaf area was little affected by drought so total dry-matter production was most affected by differences in leaf area.

Early drought gave fewer tillers (550/m2) and fewer grains per ear (18) than did irrigation (760 tillers/m2 and 21 grains per ear). Late irrigation after drought increased the number of grains per ear slightly but not the number of ears/m2. Thus at the start of the grain-filling period crops which had suffered drought early had fewer grains than irrigated (9·5 and 18·8 × 103/m2 respectively) or crops which suffered drought later in development (14 × 103/m2).

During the first 2 weeks of filling, grains grew at almost the same rate in all treatments. Current assimilate supply was probably insufficient to provide this growth in crops which had suffered drought, and stem reserves were mobilized, as shown by the decrease in stem mass during the period. Grains filled for 8 days longer with irrigation and were heavier (36–38 mg) than without irrigation (29–30 mg). Drought throughout the grainfilling period after irrigation earlier in the season resulted in the smallest grains (29 mg).

Grain yield depended on the number of ears, the number of grains per ear and mass per grain. Early drought decreased tillering and tiller ear production and the number of grains that filled in each ear. Late drought affected grain size via the effects on photosynthetic surface area.

Drought decreased the concentrations of phosphorus, potassium and magnesium in the dry matter of crops, and irrigation after drought increased them. Concentration of nitrogen was little affected by treatment. Possible mechanisms by which water deficits and nutrient supply affect crop growth and yield are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 96 , Issue 1 , February 1981 , pp. 167 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bldinger, F., Musgrave, R. B. & Flscher, R. A. (1977). Contribution of stored pre-anthesis assimilate to grain yield in wheat and barley. Nature 270, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biscoe, P. V., Gallagher, J. N., Littleton, E. J., Monteith, J. L. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. IV. Sources of assimilate for the grain. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocklehurst, P. A. (1977). Factors controlling grain weight in wheat. Nature 266, 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocklehurst, P. A., Moss, J. P. & Williams, W. (1978). Effects of irradiance and water supply on grain development in wheat. Annals of Applied Biology 90, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W., Lawlor, D. W. & Legg, B. J. (1981). The effects of drought on barley: soil and plant water relations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 96, 61–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, W., Legg, B. J., French, B. K., Johnston, A. E., Lawlor, D. W. & Jeffers, W. De C.s (1978). A drought experiment using mobile shelters: the effect of drought on barley yield, water use and nutrient uptake. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 599–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyson, P. W. (1977). An investigation into the relations between some growth parameters and yield of barley. Annals of Applied Biology 87, 471–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Assimilate partitioning and high yield in cereals. Proceedings of BCPC/BPGRG Symposium. ‘Opportunities for Chemical Plant Growth Regulation’.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Hunter, B. (1976). Effects of drought on grain growth. Nature 264, 541–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1975). Barley and its environment. V. Stability of grain weight. Journal of Applied Ecology 12, 319–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1976). Barley and its environment. VI. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Applied Ecology 13, 563–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, W. R. (1965). Dynamic aspects of soil-water availability to plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 16, 323–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, T. C. (1973). Plant responses to water stress. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 24, 519–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husain, I. & Aspinall, D. (1970). Water stress and apical morphogenesis in barley. Annals of Botany 34, 393–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, D. W. (1972). Growth and water use oilolium perenne. II. Plant growth. Journal of Applied Ecology 9, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawlor, D. W. (1979). Effects of water and heat stress on carbon metabolism of plants with C3 and C4 photosynthesis. In Stress Physiology in Crop Plants (ed. Mussel, H. and Staples, R. C.), pp. 303–326. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Brown, N. J. & Smith, G. J. (1978). Small plots and automatic rain shelters: a field appraisal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 75, 445–450.Google Scholar
Legg, B. J., Day, W., Lawlor, D. W. & Parkinson, K. J. (1979). The effect of drought on barley growth: models and measurements showing the relative importance of leaf area and photosynthetic rate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 703–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preiss, J. (1978). ADP glucose pyrophosphorylase. In Advances in Enzymology (ed. Meister, A.) 46, pp. 317–381. New York: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Rackham, O. (1972). Responses of the barley crop to soil water stress. In Crop Processes in Controlled Environments (ed. Rees, A. R.), pp. 127–138. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Salter, P. J. & Goode, J. E. (1967). Crop responses to water at different stages of growth. Commonwealth Bureau of Horticulture, East Mailing Research Review No. 2.Google Scholar
Shimshi, D. (1969). A rapid field method for measuring photosynthesis with labelled carbon dioxide. Journal of Experimental Botany 20, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiertz, J. H. J. (1978). Grain production and assimilate utilisation of wheat in relation to cultivar characteristics, climatic factors and nitrogen supply. Agricultural Research Report 881. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1974). Physiology of grain yield of wheat and barley. Report Rothamsted Experimental Station for 1973, Part 2, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Welbank, P. J. (1974). Root growth of different species and varieties of cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 25, 231–232.Google Scholar
Welbank, P. J. & Williams, E. D. (1968). Root growth of a barley crop estimated by sampling with portable- powered soil-coring equipment. Journal of Applied Ecology 5, 477–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar