Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:51:12.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growth and dry-matter partitioning in sugar beet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. F. J. Milford
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
K. Z. Travis
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
T. O. Pocock
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
K. W. Jaggard
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Bury St Edmonds, Suffolk, IP28 6NP
W. Day
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute of Arable Crops Research Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ

Summary

Data from 11 sugar-beet crops grown at different sites, in different years and with some variations in husbandry have been used to re-examine the process of dry-matter partitioning. Two-phase linear models did not describe adequately the distribution of dry matter. There was no evidence of a discontinuity in the partitioning between root and shoot at any point in crop development. It is suggested that, contrary to a recent view, events in the shoot, rather than the storage root, largely determine how dry matter is allocated between growth and sugar storage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, M. J., Squire, A. & Milford, G. F. J. (1986 a). The nitrogen nutrition of sugar beet – an approach to better forecasting of nitrogen fertilizer requirement. British Sugar Beet Review 54 (1), 8487.Google Scholar
Armstrong, M. J., Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Last, P. J. & Day, W. (1986 b). The dynamics of nitrogen uptake and its immobilization during growth of sugar beet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 145154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhuyzen, , Sande, H. L. Van de (1949). Growth and production of sugar beets. Verslagen van Landbouwkundige Onderzoekingen 55 (2), 1227.Google Scholar
Bergen, P. (1966). Seasonal patterns of sucrose accumulation and weight increase in sugar beets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 14, 583645.Google Scholar
Bouillene, R., Kronacher, P. G. & Roubaix, J. De (1940). Etapes morphologiques et chimiques dans le cycle végétatif de la betterare sucrière. Publications Institut Beige pour L'Amélioration de la Betterare 8, 87166.Google Scholar
Bray, W. E. & Thompson, K. J. (1985). Sugar Beet – a Grower's Guide, 81 pp. Broom's Barn Experimental Station, Higham, Suffolk: Sugar Beet Research and Education Committee.Google Scholar
Day, W. (1986). A simple model to describe variation between years in the early growth of sugar beet. Field Crops Research 14, 213220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doney, D. L., Wyse, R. E. & Theurer, J. C. (1981). The relationship between cell size, yield and sucrose concentration of the sugar-beet root. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 61, 447453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follett, R. F., Schmehl, W. R. & Viets, F. G. (1970). Seasonal leaf area, dry weight and sucrose accumulation by sugar beets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 16, 235252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginneken, P. J. H. Van (1959). The development of the sugar content of sugar beet during the growth period. Mededeelingen van het Instituut voor Suikerbeitenteelt 29, 119260.Google Scholar
Green, C. F., Vaidyanathan, L. V. & Ivins, J. D. (1986). Growth of sugar-beet crops including the influence of synthetic plant growth regulators. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 285297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., Draycott, A., Last, P. J. & Draycott, A. P. (1984). A concise model for interpreting N fertilizer trials. Fertilizer Research 5, 355369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houba, V. J. G. (1973). Effect of nitrogen dressings on growth and development of sugar beet. Agricultural Research Reports 791. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Jaggard, K. W., Lawrence, D. K. & Biscoe, P. V. (1981). An understanding of crop physiology in assessing a plant growth regulator on sugar beet. In Chemical Manipulation of Crop Growth and Development (ed. McLaren, J. S.), pp. 139150. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. (1973). The growth and development of the storage root of sugar-beet. Annals of Applied Biology 75, 427438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. (1976). Sugar concentration in sugar beet: varietal differences and the effects of soil type and planting density on the size of the root cells. Annals of Applied Biology 83, 251257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Biscoe, P. V., Jaggard, K. W., Scott, R. K. & Draycott, A. P. (1980). Physiological potential for increasing yields of sugar beet. In Opportunities for Increasing Crop Yields (ed. Hurd, R. G., Biscoe, P. V. and Dennis, C.), pp. 7185. London: Pitmans.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O. & Riley, J. (1985 a). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. II. Leaf appearance in field crops. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 173185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Riley, J. & Messem, A. B. (1985 b). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. III. Leaf expansion in field crops. Annals of Applied Biology 106, 187203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Jaggard, K. W., Biscoe, P. V., Armstrong, M. J., Last, P. J. & Goodman, P. J. (1985 c). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. IV. The expansion of the leaf canopy in relation to temperature and nitrogen. Annals of Applied Biology 107, 335347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. & Thorne, G. N. (1973). The effect of light and temperature late in the season on the growth of sugar beet. Annals of Applied Biology 75, 419425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milford, G. F. J. & Watson, D. J. (1971). The effect of nitrogen on the growth and sugar content of sugar beet. Annals of Botany 35, 287300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1978). Exact and approximate confidence regions for functions of parameters in non-linear models. In Compstal 1978: Proceedings in Computational Statistics (ed. Corsten, L. C. A. and Hermans, J.), pp. 110116. Vienna; Physica-Verlag.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1980). Maximum Likelihood Program. Lawes Agricultural Trust, Rothamsted Experimental Station.Google Scholar
Ross, G. J. S. (1981). The use of non-linear regression methods in crop modelling. In Mathematics and Plant Physiology (ed. Rose, D. A. and Charles-Edwards, D. A.), pp. 269282. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. (1983). The year 1982 and the growth of the crop. Rothamsted Report for 1982, Part I, pp. 6972.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K. & Jaggard, K. W. (1978). Theoretical criteria for maximum yield. Proceedings of the 41st Winter Congress of the International Institute for Sugar Beet Research, Brussels, pp. 179198.Google Scholar
Scott, R. K., Jaggard, K. W. & Dunning, R. A. (1985). A review of research at Broom's Barn Experimental Station 1979–84. British Sugar Beet Review 53(3), 2026.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1952). The influence of temperature and light factors on the growth and development of sugar beet in controlled climatic environments. Agronomy Journal 44, 6673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1953). Growth and development of sugar-beet plants at two nitrogen levels in a controlled-temperature greenhouse. Proceedings of the 8th General Meeting, American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists, pp. 325338.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. (1955). Influence of night temperature and nitrogen deficiency on the growth, sucrose accumulation and leaf minerals of sugar-beet plants. Plant Physiology 30, 250257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1956). Leaf growth in relation to crop yield. In The Growth of Leaves (ed. Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 178191. London: Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Selman, I. W. (1938 a). A comparative physiological study of sugar beet and mangold with respect to growth and sugar accumulation. I. Growth analysis of the crop in the field. Annals of Botany 6, 437480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. & Selman, I. W. (1938 b). A comparative physiological study of sugar beet and mangold with respect to growth and sugar accumulation. II. Changes in sugar content. Annals of Botany 6, 827846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. H., Bragg, P. L., Porter, J. R. & Rayner, J. H. (1984). A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 371382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, R. E. (1979). Parameters controlling sucrose content and yield of sugar-beet roots. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 20, 368385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar