Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:55:23.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Genetic and environmental causes of variation in birth weight of Black Bengal goats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. K. Moulick
Affiliation:
Central Livestock Besearch-cum-Breeding Station, Haringhata, West Bengal, India
O. Syrstad
Affiliation:
Central Livestock Besearch-cum-Breeding Station, Haringhata, West Bengal, India

Summary

An investigation on the different environmental and genetic causes of variation in the birth weight of Black Bengal goats was conducted at the Central Livestock Research-cum-Breeding Station, Haringhata, India. The data consisted of 1375 birth weight records of kids from 284 does and 20 bucks during the period from 1955 to 1961. The goats were maintained under standard farm management throughout the period.

Year had significant effect on birth weight, while the effect of season was insignificant. The interaction was, however, significant. Male kids were significantly heavier at birth than the females. Age of dam and litter size also caused significant variation in birth weight of kids.

From paternal half-sib analysis the heritability of birth weight was estimated to be 0·01. Full sib and maternal half sib analyses estimated the maternal environment common to litter mates to account for 60 % of the variance, out of which 25 % were due to permanent differences between dams. The remaining 39 % were attributed to individual environment, including most of the non-additive genetic variance. The heritability of maternal environment was estimated to be 0·2.

The partial correlation coefficient between birth weight of kids and post-kidding body weight of their dam, independent of litter size and age of dam, was 0·175. Thus, body size of dam, as indicated by post kidding body weight, did not reveal much information about maternal environment.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahmed, I. A. & Tantawy, A. O. (1960). Studies on Egyptian Baladi Goats. H Some factors affecting mortality rates. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28, 104.Google Scholar
Amble, V. N., Khandekar, N. C. & Garg, J. N. (1964). Statistical studies on breeding data of Beetal goats. I.C.A.R. Research Series No. 38. New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Blackwell, R. L. & Henderson, C. R. (1955). Variation in fleece weight, weaning weight and birth weight of sheep under farm condition. J. Anim. Set. 14, 831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butcher, R. L., Dunbar, R. S. Jr & Welch, J. A. (1964). Heritabilities of and correlations between lamb birth weight and 140-day weight. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, H. P., Russell, W. S. & St Taylor, C. S. (1962). Birth weight of reciprocally cross-bred calves. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 58, 405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, H. & Herz, A. (1964). Fertility and birth weight of goats in subtropical environment. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falconer, D. S. (1967). Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Goulden, C. H. (1962). Methods of Statistical analysis. Bombay: Asia Publishing House.Google Scholar
Guha, H., Gupta, A., Mukherjee, A. K., Moulick, S. K. & Bhattacharya, S. (1968). Some causes of variation in the growth rates of Black Bengal Goats. Indian J. vet. Sci. 38, 269.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. L. (1956). The maternal influence on size of sheep. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48, 36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karam, H. A. (1959a). Some factors affecting lamb mortality in Rahmani sheep. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 27, 133.Google Scholar
Karam, H. A. (1959b). Birth, weaning and yearling weight of Rahmani sheep. I. Effects of some environmental factors. II. Heritability estimates and correlations. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 27, 311.Google Scholar
Koch, R. M. & Clark, R. T. (1955). Genetic and environmental relationship among economic characters in beef cattle. III. Evaluating maternal environment. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulick, S. K., Guha, H., Gupta, S., Mitra, D. K. & Bhattacharya, S. (1966). Factors affecting multiple birth in Black Bengal goats. Indian J. vet. Sci. 36, 154.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. H. & Venkatachalam, G. (1949). Estimates of heritability of birth weight and weaning weight of lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 8, 607.Google Scholar
Ragab, M. T., Asker, A. A. & Kadi, M. R. (1953). Genetic factors affecting weights of Ossimi lambs. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 21, 304.Google Scholar
Shelton, M. (1964). Relation of birth weight to death losses and to certain productive characters of fall born lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 23, 355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. (1961). Statistical Methods (Indian edition). Bombay: Allied Pacific Private Ltd.Google Scholar
Tantawy, A. O. & Ahmed, I. A. (1960). Studies in Egyptian Baladi goats. I. Frequency of multiple births and sex rates. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 28, 74.Google Scholar
Yao, T. S., Simmons, V. L. & Schott, R. G. (1953). Heritability of fur characters and birth weight in Karakul lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 12, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar