Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:35:21.011Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: shade behaviour and factors affecting the herding of eland, oryx, buffalo and zebu cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. G. Lewis
J. G. Lewis
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Leadership Foundation, P.O. Box 48177, Nairobi, Kenya
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Studies on night-enclosed eland, oryx, buffalo and cattle in south eastern Kenya showed that the animals spent only a short time each day in the shade; the mean duration was not more than 2 h/day for any species.

All four species actively sought shade in the middle of the day. The time spent in the shade by the three indigenous species was significantly related to activity times and environmental heat load; that of cattle was not.

In general the time spent in the shade by the four species could be related to characteristics of their coat.

The captive animals at Galana spend less time in the shade than their free-living counterparts. This is thought to be partly due to the need of wild animals to reduce their total body water turnover rate and for captive animals to spend more time feeding during the day.

The inter-individual distances (IID) maintained by eland, oryx and cattle and the synchronization of the activity of these three species and buffalo were also studied.

Eland maintained the largest mean IID (13·7 m) while those for oryx (6·5 m) and cattle (4·0 m) were considerably less. Calculations showed that herds of 250 eland might occupy an area of approximately 5 ha, oryx 1 ha and cattle would occupy 0·5 ha. The IID of all three species were significantly related to activity and the IIDs of eland and oryx were significantly related to meteorological factors. The differences in the IIDs of the three species were thought to be due to differences in feeding strategies and the length of time for which cattle have been domesticated.

For all species feeding was well synchronized, but walking, idling and shade behaviour were not. Although only one activity was well synchronized it was the most time consuming one. The lack of synchrony in other activities did not pose a great problem in the management of the relatively small herds being studied. Lack of synchrony, however, might cause a problem if the size of the herds were substantially increased.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 3 , June 1978 , pp. 587 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dudzinski, M. L. & Arnold, G. W. (1967). Aerial photography and statistical analysis for studying behaviour patterns of grazing animals. Journal of Range Management 20, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, C. R. (1975). Climate and food habits of ungulates on Galana Ranch. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 203–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, V. (1974). On the relationship of social evolution and ecology in ungulates. American Zoology 14, 205–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harker, K. W., Taylor, J. I. & Rollinson, D. H. L. (1954). Studies on the habits of zebu cattle. I. Preliminary observations of grazing habits. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 44, 193–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmann, R. R. (1973). The Ruminant Stomach. East African Monographs in Biology, vol. 2. Nairobi: East African Literature Bureau.Google Scholar
King, J. M., Kingaby, G. P., Colvin, J. G. & Heath, B. R. (1975). Seasonal variation in water turnover by oryx and eland on the Galana Game Ranch Research Project. East African Wildlife Journal 13, 287–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, J. M., Heath, B. R., & Hill, R. E. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: theory and practice. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 445–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, J. G. (1977). Game domestication for animal production in Kenya: activity patterns of eland, oryx, buffalo and cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 551–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N., Bent, D. H. & Hull, C. H. (1970). Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. U.S.A.: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Scott, J. P. (1962). Introduction to animal behaviour. In The Behaviour of Domestic Animals (ed. Hafez, E. S. E.), pp. 3–21. London: Baillière, Tindall & Cassell.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. (1970). Studies in the ecology of the East African Buffalo. D.Phil, thesis, Oxford University.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R. & Rohlf, F. J. (1969). Biometry. San Fransisco: Freeman.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R. (1970). Ranching in arid lands; physiology of wild and domestic ungulates in the desert. Botswana Notes and Records, special edition no. 1.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. B. (1972). The desert gazelle; a paradox resolved. Symposium of the Zoological Society of London, no. 31, pp. 215–27.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. R. & Lyman, C. P. (1967). A comparative study of the environmental physiology of an East African antelope, the eland, and the hereford steer. Physiological Zoology 40, 280–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tinbergen, N. (1953). Social Behaviour in Animals. Methuen.Google Scholar
Vesey Fitzgerald, D. F. (1969). Utilization of habitat by buffalo in Lake Manyara National Park. East African Wildlife Journal 7, 131–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar