Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:40:30.339Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Field studies on the growth and development of winter wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. S. McLaren
J. S. McLaren
Affiliation:
University of Nottingham, Department of Agriculture and Horticulture, School of Agriculture, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, LE12 5RD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The effects of variety, plant density and time of N application on the yield and yield components of winter wheat were investigated in factorial experiments during 1977–8 and 1978–9, at Sutton Bonington. Armada produced substantially fewer vegetative tillers/m2 but the number of ears/m2, from anthesis onwards, was similar to that of Maris Huntsman. The effects of the time of N application on tiller production and survival differed between the 2 years and may have been related to the amount of residual N in the soil. A linear relationship was found between the number of tillers/m2 which died and the maximum number of tillers/m2.

Kador produced a lower grain yield than Armada or Maris Huntsman, owing to a combination of lower ratio of grain D.M. to total above-ground D.M. (harvest index) and lower total dry-matter production. Armada produced a higher grain yield than Maris Huntsman in response to earlier application of N. Grain yield was less variable when final plant densities were greater than 200/m2.

Grain yield was not particularly well related to individual yield components but showed a good linear relationship with number of grains/m2. Grain yield was also linearly related to total dry-matter production, with treatment effects on harvest index being relatively small. The results indicate that factors which influenced crop growth during grain site development were relatively more important than the factors affecting subsequent grain filling.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 97 , Issue 3 , December 1981 , pp. 685 - 697
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, R. B. (1978). Aotual and potential yields of wheat and barley in the United Kingdom. ADAS Quarterly Review 29, 76–87.Google Scholar
Bingham, J. (1972). Physiological objectives in breeding for grain yield in wheat. Proceedings of the 6th Eucarpia Congress, Cambridge, 1971, pp. 15–29.Google Scholar
Bremner, P. M. (1967). Some aspects of the relationship between growth and yield of wheat. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Bremner, P. M. (1969). Growth and yield of three varieties of wheat, with particular reference to the influence of unproductive tillers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwinkel, A. (1978). Patterns of tillering and grain production of winter wheat at a wide range of plant densities. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 383–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwinkel, A., ten Hag, B. A. & Kuizenga, J. (1977). Effect of sowing date and seed rate on crop development and grain production in winter wheat. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 25, 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donald, C. M. (1968). The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17, 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Effland, H. (1977). Schleswig-Holstein – a planned approach towards higher cereal yields. BASF Agricultural News.Google Scholar
Ellis, F. B., Elliot, J. G., Pollard, F., Cannell, R. Q. & Barnes, B. T. (1979). Comparison of direct drilling, reduced cultivation and ploughing on the growth of cereals. 3. Winter wheat and spring barley on a calcareous clay. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge, 93, 391–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engledow, F. L. & Ramiah, K. (1930). Investigations on yield in cereals. VII. A study of development and yield of wheat based upon varietal comparison. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 20, 265–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engledow, F. L. & Wadham, S. M. (1923). Investigations on yield in the cereals. I. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 13, 390–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, L. T. (1978). The influence of irradiance before and after anthesis on grain yield and its components in miorocrops of wheat grown in a constant daylength and temperature regime. Field Crops Research 1, 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, S. A. (1977). The influence of plant density and distribution and applied nitrogen on the growth and yield of winter wheat and spring barley. Experimental Husbandry 33, 120–126.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A., Aquilar, I. & Laino, D. R. (1977). Post anthesis sink size in a high yielding dwarf wheat. Yield response to grain number. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978 a). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978 b). A physiological analysis of cereal yield. II. Partitioning of dry matter. Agricultural Progress 53, 51–70.Google Scholar
Green, B. N. (1977). What we know about cereal husbandry systems. In The Yield of Cereals, pp. 19–21. Stoneleigh: National Agricultural Centre.Google Scholar
Gregory, P. J. (1977). The growth and activity of wheat root systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
Jaffe, M. J., Biro, R. & Bridle, K. (1980). Thigmomorphogenesis: calibration of the parameters of the sensory function in beans. Physiologia Plantarum 49, 410–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1967). The effect of plant density upon the growth and yield of barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 68, 317–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laloux, R. (1977). The Laloux method of growing oereals for maximum yield. The Kenneth Wilson Group.Google Scholar
Puckeridge, D. W. & Donald, C. M. (1967). Competition among wheat plants sown at a wide range of densities. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebuck, J. F. & Trenerry, J. (1978). Precision drilling of cereals. Experimental Husbandry 34, 1–11.Google Scholar
Silvey, V. (1978). The contribution of new varieties to inoreasing cereal yield in England and Wales. Journal of the National Institute of Agricultural Botany 14, 367–384.Google Scholar
Spiertz, J. H. J. & Ellen, J. (1978). Effects of nitrogen on crop development and grain growth of winter wheat in relation to assimilation and utilization of assimilates and nutrients. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 26, 210–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanhill, G. (1976). Trends and deviations in the yield of the English wheat orop during the last 750 years. Agro-Ecosystems 3, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorne, G. N. (1973). Physiology of grain yield of wheat and barley. Annual Report for Rothamsted Experimental Station, Part 2, pp. 5–25.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V., Johnston, A. E. & Penny, A. (1980). Multifactorial experimentation on continuous winter wheat grown in sandy clay soil at Saxmundham, Suffolk. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 94, 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Holliday, R. (1971). Plant population, shading and thinning studies in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 453–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, J. C., Chang, T. T. & Konzak, C. F. (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Research 14, 415–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar