Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:30:32.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba for goat feeding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2020

A. G. S. Matias ,
G. G. L. Araujo ,
F. S. Campos Open the ORCID record for F. S. Campos [Opens in a new window] ,
S. A. Moraes ,
G. C. Gois Open the ORCID record for G. C. Gois [Opens in a new window] ,
T. S. Silva ,
J. V. Emerenciano Neto Open the ORCID record for J. V. Emerenciano Neto [Opens in a new window]  and
T. V. Voltolini
A. G. S. Matias
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina/PE56304-917, Brazil
G. G. L. Araujo
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Highway BR-428, Km 152, s/n - Countryside, Petrolina/PE56302-970, Brazil
F. S. Campos
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Program in Animal Science and Pastures, Federal University of Agreste of Pernambuco, Avenue Bom Pastor, s/n - Boa Vista, Garanhuns/PE55292-270, Brazil
S. A. Moraes
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Highway BR-428, Km 152, s/n - Countryside, Petrolina/PE56302-970, Brazil
G. C. Gois*
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina/PE56304-917, Brazil
T. S. Silva
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Paraíba, Highway PB-079, Areia/PB58397-000, Brazil
J. V. Emerenciano Neto
Affiliation:
Postgraduate Program in Animal Science, Federal University of Vale do São Francisco, Petrolina/PE56304-917, Brazil
T. V. Voltolini
Affiliation:
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation, Highway BR-428, Km 152, s/n - Countryside, Petrolina/PE56302-970, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: G. C. Gois, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the fermentation profile and nutritional quality of silages composed of cactus pear and maniçoba. Two experiments were performed: the first evaluated the fermentation characteristics, chemical composition and determined the organic acids in cactus pear silages with the inclusion of five levels of maniçoba (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%) in six opening times (1, 7, 15, 30, 60 and 90 days). The second experiment determined the nutrient intake, digestibility, water balance and nitrogen balance in Canindé goats fed diets based on cactus pear silage with the inclusion of four levels of maniçoba (25, 50, 75 and 100%), with six animals per treatment. The increase in maniçoba levels in cactus pear silage provided a linear increase in the butyric acid, dry matter (DM), ether extract, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre, acid detergent fibre, lignin, cellulose, hemicellulose, water intake via drinking fountain and metabolic water, and reduced the pH, lactic acid, acetic acid, mineral matter, total carbohydrates, non-fibrous carbohydrates, water intake via food, total water intake, water excreted in the faeces, water excreted in the urine, total water excretion and water balance. Quadratic behaviour was observed for N-NH3, DM recovery and propionic acid, with an increase in maniçoba levels in cactus pear silages. Regarding the different opening times, there was a significant effect in pH, N-NH3, acetic acid, lactic acid and butyric acid (P < 0.050). The inclusion of maniçoba in cactus pear silage improved the fermentation characteristics and nutritional quality to be used in diets for goats.

Keywords

Canindé goatManihot pseudoglazioviiOpuntia fícus indicasemiarid regionwater supply
Type
Animal Research Paper
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 158 , Issue 4 , May 2020 , pp. 304 - 312
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Dawood, A (2017) Towards heat stress management in small ruminants – a review. Annals of Animal Science 17, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alves, EM, Magalhães, DR, Freitas, MA, Santos, EJ, Pereira, MLA and Pedreira, MS (2014) Nitrogen metabolism and microbial synthesis in sheep fed diets containing slow release urea to replace the conventional urea. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 36, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araújo, GGL, Santos, GA, Voltolini, TV, Moraes, SA, Pereira, LGR, Gois, GC and Campos, FS (2018) Chemical composition and fermentative characteristics of old man saltbush silage supplemented with energy concentrates. Semina: Ciências Agrárias 39, 1155–1166.Google Scholar
Arreola, AG, Ortiz, MM, Carrasco, GP, Saucedo, FR and Torres, EH (2019) Nutritive quality and gas production of corn silage with the addition of fresh and fermented prickly pear cladodes. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 40, 6544–6553.Google Scholar
AOAC, Association of Official Analytical Chemists (2016). Official Methods of Analysis, 20th Edn. Washington, D.C., Latimer Jr., G.W., 3172 p.Google Scholar
Beauchemin, KA (2018) Current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 4762–4784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bernardes, TF, Daniel, JLP, Adesogan, AT, McAllister, TA, Drouin, P, Nussio, LG, Huhtanen, P, Tremblay, GF, Bélanger, G and Cai, Y (2018) Silage review: unique challenges of silages made in hot and cold regions. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 4001–4019.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolsen, KK, Lin, C, Brent, BE, Feverherm, AM, Urban, JE and Aimutis, WR (1992) Effect of silage additives on the microbial succession and fermentation process of alfalfa and corn silages. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 3066–3083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borreani, G, Tabacco, E, Schmidt, ERJ, Holmes, BJ and Muck, RE (2018) Silage review: factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science 101, 3952–3979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cardoso, AR, Pires, CC, Carvalho, S, Galvani, DB, Jochims, F, Hastenpflug, M and Wommer, TP (2006) Consumo de nutrientes e desempenho de cordeiros alimentados com dietas que contem diferentes níveis de fibra em detergente neutro. Cie^ncia Rural 36, 215–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, FAL, Resende, PX, Benício, CA, Siqueira, JO, Menezes, DR and Queiroz, MAA (2018) Chemical-bromatological composition and in vitro ruminal kinetics of sugarcane silage with maniçoba. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 40, e42569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, DC (1976) Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants: Digestive Physiology, 2nd Edn, Corvallis: O & B Books Publishing, 349 p.Google Scholar
Çürek, M and Özen, N (2004) Feed value of cactus and cactus silage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 28, 633–639.Google Scholar
Embrapa (2017) Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Dados meteorológicos. http://www.cpatsa.embrapa.br:8080/servicos/dadosmet/ceb-dia.html. Accessed on: 01/11/2019.Google Scholar
Getahun, D, Alemneh, T, Akeberegn, D, Getabalew, M and Zewdie, D (2019) Urea metabolism and recycling in ruminants. Biomedical Journal of Scientific & Technical Research 20, 14790–14796.Google Scholar
Gois, GC, Matias, AGS, Araújo, GGL, Campos, FS, Simões, WL, Lista, FN, Guimarães, MJM, Silva, TS, Magalhães, ALR and Silva, JKB (2019) Nutritional and fermentative profile of forage sorghum irrigated with saline water. Biological Rhythm Research 50, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouveia, LNF, Maciel, MV, Soares, PC, Neto, IFS, Gonçalves, DNA, Batista, AMV and Carvalho, FFR (2015) Perfil metabólico de ovinos em crescimento alimentados com dietas constituídas de feno ou silagem de maniçoba e palma forrageira. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 35, 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusha, J, Halimani, TE, Ngongoni, NT and Ncube, S (2015) Effect of feeding cactus legume silages on nitrogen retention, digestibility and microbial protein synthesis in goats. Animal Feed Science and Technology 206, 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, MB (2003) Challenges with non-fiber carbohydrate methods. Journal of Animal Science 81, 3226–3232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartinger, T, Gresner, N and Südekum, KH (2018) Does intra-ruminal nitrogen recycling waste valuable resources? A review of major players and their manipulation. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 9, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Köppen, W and R, G (1928) Klimate der Erde. Gotha: Verlag Justus Perthes, Wall-map 150 cm × 200 cm.Google Scholar
Kung Junior, L and Ranjit, NK (2001) The effect of Lactobacillus buchneri and other additives on the fermentation and aerobic stability of barley silage. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1149–1155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Licitra, G, Hernandez, TM and Van Soest, PJ (1996) Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fracionation of ruminant feed. Animal Feed Science and Technology 57, 347–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, T, Tu, Y, Zhang, NF, Deng, KD and Diao, QY (2015) Effect of the ratio of non-fibrous carbohydrates to neutral detergent fiber and protein structure on intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation, and nitrogen metabolism in lambs. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 28, 1419–1426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macêdo, AJS, Santos, EM, Araújo, GGL, Edvan, RL, Oliveira, JS, Perazzo, AF, Sá, WCCS and Pereira, DM (2018) Silages in the form of diet based on spineless cactus and buffelgrass. African Journal of Range & Forage Science 35, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maciel, MV, Carvalho, FFR, Batista, AMV, Souza, EJO, Maciel, LPAA and Lima Júnior, DM (2019) Maniçoba hay or silage replaces Tifton 85 hay in spineless cactus diets for sheep. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 41, 1–6.Google Scholar
Mayer, JA and Cushman, JC (2019) Nutritional and mineral content of prickly pear cactus: a highly water-use efficient forage, fodder and food species. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P, Henderson, AR and Heron, SJE (1991) The Biochemistry of Silage, 2nd Edn, Marlow: Chalcomb Publishing, 340 p.Google Scholar
Mertens, DR (2002) Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beaker or crucibles: collaborative study. Journal AOAC International 85, 1217–1240.Google ScholarPubMed
Miranda-Romero, LA, Vazquez-Mendoza, P, Burgueño-Ferreira, JA and Osorio, GA (2018) Nutritive value of cactus pear silages for finishing lambs. Journal of the Professional Association for Cactus Development 20, 196–215.Google Scholar
Mokoboki, K, Sebola, N and Matlabe, G (2016) Effects of molasses levels and growing conditions on nutritive value and fermentation quality of Opuntia cladodes silage. Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 28, 4488–4495.Google Scholar
Moyo, M and Nsahlai, IV (2017) Rate of passage of digesta in ruminants; Are goats different? In Kukovics, S (ed), Goat Science, Cap 3. London: IntechOpen Limited, pp. 39–74.Google Scholar
Neto, JP, Soares, PC, Batista, AMV, Andrade, SFJ, Andrade, RPX, Lucena, RB and Guim, A (2016) Water balance and renal excretion of metabolites in sheep fed forage cactos (Nopalea cochenillifera Salm Dyck). Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 36, 322–328.Google Scholar
NRC (2001) National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th Edn, Washington, D.C.: National Academic Press, 405p.Google Scholar
NRC (2007) National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Small Ruminants: Sheep, Goats, Cervids, and New World Camelids. Washington, D.C: National Academic Press, 362p.Google Scholar
Oliveira, JPF, Ferreira, MAF, Alves, AMSV, Melo, ACC, Andrade, IB, Urbano, AS, Suassuna, JMA, Barros, LJA and Melo, TTB (2018) Carcass characteristics of lambs fed spineless cactus as a replacement for sugarcane. Asian Australasian Journal of Animal Science 31, 529–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pereira, DS, Lana, RP, Carmo, DL and Costa, YKS (2019) Chemical composition and fermentative losses of mixed sugarcane and pigeon pea silage. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences 41, e43709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinho, RMA, Santos, EM, Oliveira, JS, Carvalho, GGP, Silva, TC, Macêdo, AJS, Corrêa, YR and Zanine, AM (2018) Does the level of forage neutral detergent fiber affect the ruminal fermentation, digestibility and feeding behavior of goats fed cactus pear? Animal Science Journal 89, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramos, JPF, Santos, EM, Santos, APM, Souza, WH and Oliveira, JS (2016) Ensiling of forage crops in semiarid regions. In Silva, TC and Santos, EM (eds), Advances in Silage Production and Utilization, Cap 4. London: IntechOpen Limited, pp. 65–84.Google Scholar
Ren, H, Wang, C, Fan, W, Zhang, B, Li, Z and Li, D (2018) Effects of formic or acetic acid on the storage quality of mixed air-dried corn stover and cabbage waste, and microbial community analysis. Food Technology and Biotechnology 56, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rodrigues, AM, Pitacas, FI, Reis, CMG and Blasco, M (2016) Nutritional value of Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes from Portuguese ecotypes. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 22, 40–45.Google Scholar
Silva, JFC and Leão, MI (1979) Fundamentos de nutrição de ruminantes. Piracicaba: Livroceres, 380 p.Google Scholar
Silva, DJ and Queiroz, AC (2002) Análise de alimentos: métodos químicos e biológicos. Viçosa: Editora UFV, 235 p.Google Scholar
Silva, TC, Silva, LD, Santos, EM, Oliveira, JS and Perazzo, AF (2017) Importance of the fermentation to produce high-quality silage. In Jozala, AF (ed), Fermentation Processes, Cap 1. London: IntechOpen Limited, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Silva, KB, Oliveira, JS, Santos, EM, Cartaxo, FQ, Guerra, RR, Souza, AFN, Muniz, ACS and Cruz, GFL (2019) Ruminal and histological characteristics and nitrogen balance in lamb fed diets containing cactus as the only roughage. Tropical Animal Health and Production 51, 1–9.Google Scholar
Sniffen, CJ, O'Connor, JD and Van Soest, PJ (1992) A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets: II. Carbohydrate and protein availability. Journal of Animal Science 70, 3562–3577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, CR, Spinage, CA and Lyman, CP (1969) Water relations of the waterbuck. An East African antelope. American Journal of Physiology 217, 630–634.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, PJ (1994) Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant, 2nd edn, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, p. 476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C, He, L, Xing, Y, Zhou, W, Yang, F, Chen, X and Zhang, Q (2019) Effects of mixing Neolamarckia cadamba leaves on fermentation quality, microbial community of high moisture alfalfa and stylo silage. Microbial Biotechnology 12, 869–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zadeh, JB and Moradi kor, Z (2013) Ruminal protein degradation and estimation of rumen microbial protein production. International Journal of Advanced Biological and Biomedical Research 1, 914–921.Google Scholar