Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T21:42:15.022Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feeding behaviour, feed intake, chemical and botanical composition of the diet of indigenous goats raised on natural vegetation in a semi-arid region of Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. E. Nyamangara  and
L. R. Ndlovu
M. E. Nyamangara
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
L. R. Ndlovu
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zimbabwe, PO Box MP 167, Mount Pleasant, Harare, Zimbabwe
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The feeding behaviour of indigenous goats grazing on natural vegetation in a semi-arid region of Zimbabwe was studied over five seasons covering a period of one year (March 1989 to March 1990). The goats were randomly allocated to two groups, A and B, which grazed for 8 h (08.00–16.00 h) and 5 h (11.00–16.00 h) daily, respectively. These grazing times were based on the current practices of smallholder farmers. The botanical and chemical composition of the diet was determined by analysing samples collected from oesophageal fistulated goats. Daily feed intake was estimated by the total faecal collection method. Feed selection varied markedly with season and was similar in both groups. From January to March (wet season) grass formed 55–70% of the forage consumed, while from May to early November (dry period) browse, herbs and fruits formed 77–91% of the diet. Dietary crude protein levels ranged from 128 to 157 g/kg over the seasons. Neutral detergent fibre content ranged from 590 to 790 g/kg, and was highest in wet months and lowest in dry months. Feed intake ranged from 33 to 60 g/kg BW0·75 or 16–28 g/kg of body weight. It appeared that a feeding duration of 5 h per day was adequate for maintenance but insufficient for optimum production.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 124 , Issue 3 , June 1995 , pp. 455 - 461
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association of Official Analytical Chemists (1984). Official Methods of Analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th Edn. Washington, DC: AOAC.Google Scholar
Carew, B. A. R., Mosi, A. K., Mba, A. U. & Egbunike, G. N. (1980). The potential of browse plants in the nutrition of small ruminants in the humid forest and derived savanna zones of Nigeria. In Browse in Africa: The Current State of Knowledge (Ed. Houerou, H. N.), pp. 307–311. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
Central Statistical Office (1989). Quarterly Digest of Statistics (June). Harare: Central Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Cordova, F. J., Wallace, J. D. & Pieper, R. (1978). Forage intake by grazing livestock – a review. Journal of Range Management 15, 430–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devendra, C. (1978). The digestive efficiency of goats. World Review of Animal Production 14 (1), 9–22.Google Scholar
Devendra, C. & McLeroy, G. B. (1982). Goat and Sheep Production in the Tropics. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dicko-Toure, M. S. (1980 a). Measuring the secondary production of pasture: an applied example in the study of an extensive production system in Mali. In Browse in Africa: The Current State of Knowledge (Ed. Houerou, H. N.), pp. 247–253. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
Dicko-Toure, M. S. (1980 b). The contribution of browse to cattle fodder in the sedentary system of the office du Niger. In Browse in Africa: The Current Slate of Knowledge (Ed. Houerou, H. N.), pp. 313–319. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
French, M. H. (1980). Observations on the Goat, 3rd Edn.Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Goering, H. K. & Van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analyses. Agriculture Handbook No. 379, United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hale, D. H. (1986). Systems of production and productivity of goats in three communal areas of Zimbabwe. In Proceedings of a Workshop on the Improvement of Small Ruminants in Eastern and Southern Africa (Eds Adeniji, K. O. & Kategile, J. A.), pp. 181–193. Nairobi: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
Holechek, J. L., Wofford, H., Arthum, D., Galyean, M. & Wallace, J. D. (1986). Evaluation of total faecal collection for measuring cattle intake. Journal of Range Management 39, 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesperance, A. L., Jensen, E. H., Bohman, V. R. & Madsen, R. A. (1960). Measuring selective grazing with fistulated steers. Journal of Dairy Science 43, 1615–1622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, C. D. (1988). Grazing behaviour and diet selection of goats. Small Ruminant Research 1, 205–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malechek, J. C. & Leinweber, C. L. (1972). Chemical composition and in vitro digestibility of forage consumed by goats on lightly and heavily stocked ranges. Journal of Animal Science 35, 1014–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, I. L. & Maule, J. P. (1960). The Indigenous Livestock of Eastern and Southern Africa. Technical Communication No. 14, Commonwealth Bureau of Animal Breeding and Genetics. Farnham Royal: CAB International.Google Scholar
McDowell, R. E. (1972). Improvement of Livestock in Warm Climates. San Francisco: Freeman and Co.Google Scholar
McMahan, C. A. (1964). Comparative food habits of deer and three classes of livestock. Journal of Wildlife Management 28, 798–808.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, R. & Curnow, R. N. (1986). Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Mecha, I. & Adegbola, T. A. (1980). Chemical composition of Southern Nigerian forages eaten by goats. In Browse in Africa: The Current State of Knowledge (Ed. Houerou, H. N.), pp. 303–306. Addis Ababa: International Livestock Centre for Africa.Google Scholar
Merrill, L. B. & Taylor, C. A. (1981). Diet selection, grazing habits and the place of goats in range management. In Goat Production (Ed. Gall, C.), pp. 233–252. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mertens, D. R. & Ely, L. O. (1982). Relationship of rate and extent of digestion to forage utilization – a dynamic model evaluation. Journal of Animal Science 54, 895–905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, J. A. & Malechek, J. C. (1986). Dietary selection by sheep and goats in a deciduous woodland of northeastern Brazil. Journal of Range Management 39, 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfister, J. A., Malechek, J. C. & Balph, D. F. (1988). Foraging behaviour of goats and sheep in the caatinga of Brazil. Journal of Applied Ecology 25, 379–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B. H. & Flatt, W. P. (1975). The Evaluation of Feeds through Digestibility Experiments. Athens, USA: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Sibanda, S. (1984). Composition of diet selected from veld by steers fistulated at the oesophagus and body mass of nonfistulated steers grazing the same paddocks. Zimbabwe Journal of Agricultural Research 22, 105–107.Google Scholar
Statistical Package for Social Sciences Inc. (1986). SPSS-X/Users Guide, 2nd Edition. Chicago: SPSS Inc.Google Scholar
Tilley, J. M. A. & Terry, R. A. (1963). A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H. & Oliver, J. (1978). Animal Foods of Central Africa. Rhodesia Agricultural Journal Technical Hand book No. 2. Harare, Zimbabwe: Ministry of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, G. M. & Torell, D. T. (1964). The development technique for the Oesophageal fistula: a review. Journal of Range Management 17, 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whittington, D. L. & Hansen, R. M. (1985). oesophagealand rumen-fistulated animals for range livestock research in remote areas. World Animal Review 56, 45–50.Google Scholar