Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T17:46:32.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fattening studies with cross-bred (European×Zebu) bulls: 1. Performance on diets of native hay and concentrate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. B. O'Donovan ,
A. Gebrewolde ,
B. Kebede  and
E. S. E. Galal
P. B. O'Donovan
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, Holetta Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
A. Gebrewolde
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, Holetta Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
B. Kebede
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, Holetta Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
E. S. E. Galal
Affiliation:
Animal Production Section, Holetta Research Station, Institute of Agricultural Research, P.O. Box 2003, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Two group-feeding and one individual-feeding experiments were made for 112 and 182 days, respectively, with 76 cross-bred and eight Zebu bulls. Simmental, Friesian and Jersey sire breeds were mated to three Ethiopian Zebu breeds, namely Boran, Horro and Barca, while Zebu bulls were included for comparison purposes in Expt 3. The trials were conducted in confinement at Holetta Research Station, located at 2400 m elevation and having a mean maximum temperature range of 18·7–24 °C. In the group-feeding trials (Expts 1 and 2) a common diet was fed, consisting of native hay (30%) molasses (20%) and a concentrate supplement. In the third experiment, two diets containing 30 and 50% native hay were supplemented by concentrate and fed individually to eight Simmental and eight Friesian cross bulls, while eight Zebus served as a control.

The average daily gains, feed intake and conversion did not differ markedly between Simmental and Friesian crosses, but lower values were generally found for Jersey crosses. Cross-breds outgained Zebus, consumed more feed and converted it more efficiently to live-weight gain. Performance differences were noted between the Zebu breeds as well as some evidence of sire × dam breed interactions. Significantly higher gains were achieved with the low than with the high roughage diet.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 90 , Issue 2 , April 1978 , pp. 425 - 429
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cartwright, T. C., Ellis, G. F. Jun.Kruse, W. E. & Grouch, E. K. (1964). Hybrid vigor in Brahman Hereford crosses. Texas Agriculture Experiment Station Technology Monograph No. 1.Google Scholar
Cunha, T. J., Koger, M. & Warwick, A. C. (1963). Crossbreeding Beef Cattle. Gainesville, Florida: University of Florida Press.Google Scholar
Gebeewolde, A., O'Donovan, P. B., Gebremariam, H., Kebede, B. & Galal, E. S. E. (1978). Fattening studies with cross-bred (European × Zebu) bulls. 2. Rate and efficiency of gain on diets of maize residues and concentrate. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 431–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harbers, L. H., Schalles, R. R., Okoyoe, B. I. C. & Zemmelink, G. (1972). Comparative study of white Fulani, Friesian and White Fulani-Friesian bulls for meat production. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad and Tobago) 49, 1–8.Google Scholar
Kebede, B., Galal, E. S. E., Gebbewolde, A., O'Donovan, P. B., Gebbelul, S., Woldegebriel, A. & Gebremariam, H. (1977). Cattle crossbreeding (European × Zebu) studies. Study on growth rate of F1 calves. Animal Production Bulletin, No. 1. Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa.Google Scholar
Kennedy, J. F. (1961). The bearing of experimental work at Belmont on beef cattle breeding in Queensland. Australian New Zealand Association for Advancement of Science. Communication to Section of 25th Congress.Google Scholar
Kincaid, C. M. (1962). Breed crosses with beef cattle in the south. AHRD-ABD Bulletin 81, U.S. Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Lampkin, G. H. & Kennedy, J. F. (1965). Some observations on reproduction, weight change under lactation stress and the mothering ability of British and cross-bred Zebu cattle in the tropics. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 64, 407–12.Google Scholar
Ledger, H. P., Rogerson, A. & Freeman, G. H. (1970). Further studies on the voluntary food intake of Bos indicus, Bos taurus and crossbred cattle. Animal Production 12, 425–31.Google Scholar
O'Donovan, P. B., Chen, M. C. & Gillingham, R. S. (1973). Beef production from exotic and crossbred cattle on different feeding planes in a tropical environment. Tropical Agriculture (Trinidad) 50, 101–12.Google Scholar
Reynolds, W. L. (1960). Genetic and environmental influences affecting birth weights, weaning data and reproductive performance in beef cattle. Ph.D. thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Rogerson, A., Ledger, H. P. & Freeman, G. H. (1968). Food intake and liveweight comparisons of Bos indicus and Bos taurus steers on a high plane of nutrition. Animal Production 10, 373–80.Google Scholar
Vaccaro, L. P. De (1975 a). Some aspects of the performance of European purebred and crossbred dairy cattle in the tropics. 3. Growth, size and age at first calving in Holstein-Friesian and their crosses. Animal Breeding Abstracts 43 (10), 493–505.Google Scholar
Vacarro, L. P. De (1975 b). Some aspects of the performance of European purebred and crossbred dairy cattle in the tropics. 4. Growth, size and age at first calving in Brown Swiss, Jersey and their crosses. Animal Breeding Abstracts 43 (12), 645–56.Google Scholar
Warwick, E. J. (1958). Fifty years of progress in breeding beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 17, 922–43.Google Scholar
Willis, M. B. & Preston, T. R. (1968). The performance of different breeds of beef cattle in Cuba. Animal Production 10, 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar