Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:49:11.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Factors influencing the relationship between the secretion of milk and butterfat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Joseph Edwards
Joseph Edwards
Affiliation:
Production Division, Milk Marketing Board, Thames Ditton
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A review of published work emphasizes the existence of a fundamental relationship between the quantity of milk and butterfat per cent. This general relationship may be stated thus: as the quantity of milk increases, the quantity of fat increases also, but at a slower rate. Therefore, the fat per cent, or concentration, falls as the volume of milk increases.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 40 , Issue 1-2 , January 1950 , pp. 100 - 125
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1950

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bartlett, S. (1929). J. Brit. Dairy Fmrs' Ass. 39, 69.Google Scholar
Bartlett, S., Folley, S. J., Rowland, S. J., Curnow, D. H. & Simpson, S. A. (1948). Nature, Lond., 162, 845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, K. W. D. (1932–1933). J. Dairy Res. 4, 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curnow, D. H. (1949). Private communication.Google Scholar
Dastur, N. N. & Smith, J. A. B. (1939). Chem. Ind., Land., 58, 651.Google Scholar
Eckles, C. H. & Palmer, L. S. (1916). Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 24.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. (1932). J. Agric. Sci. 22, 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, J. (1936). J. Dairy Res. 7, 211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espe, D. L. (1941). Secretion of Milk. Ames, Iowa: Collegiate Press Inc.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. A. (1936). Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Folley, S. J. (1949). Biol. Rev. 24, 316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folley, S. J. & French, T. H. (1949). Nature, Lond., 163, 174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaines, W. L. & Davidson, F. A. (1926). J. Gen. Physiol. 9, 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, E. R. & Turner, C. W. (1936). Res. Bull. Mo. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 234.Google Scholar
Golding, J. (1928). Rep. Proc. World's Dairy Congress, p. 44.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1936). Vet. Rec. 16, 519.Google Scholar
Hartley, K. & Baker, D. W. H. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 6, 353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, R. R. & McCandlish, A. C. (1929). J. Agric. Sci. 19, 342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, F. & Watkin, J. E. (1938). J. Dairy Res. 9, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClymont, G. L. (1948). Private communication.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, A. C., Turner, C. W. & Brody, S. (1924). J. Dairy Sci. 7, 249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, E. J. (1928). Rep. Proc. World's Dairy Congress, p. 281.Google Scholar
Sanders, H. G. (1927). J. Agric. Sci. 17, 339, 502; 18, 46, 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. C. & Petersen, W. E. (1940). J. Dairy Sci. 23, 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cox, G. M. (1935). Res. Bull. Io. Agric. Exp. Sta., p. 180.Google Scholar
Swett, W. W., Miller, F. W., Graves, R. R. & Creech, G. T. (1932). J. Agric. Res. 45, 577.Google Scholar
Ward, A. H. & Campbell, J. T. (1938). J. Agric. Sci. 28, 309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, J. & Sanders, H. G. (1935). Principles and Practice of Field Experimentation. London: Empire Cotton Growing Corporation.Google Scholar
Whetham, E. O. & Hammond, J. (1935). J. Dairy Res. 4, 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar