Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:01:23.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer: VII. Observations on the effect of the energy intake on the utilization of protein in growth and in lactation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. H. Broster
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
Valerie J. Tuck
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
T. Smith
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading
V. W. Johnson
Affiliation:
National Institute for Research in Dairying, University of Reading

Summary

Eight feeding trials on cattle showed that the response in live-weight gain was curvilinear when protein or energy level was varied independently in rations based on poor quality roughages to which cereals and groundnut were variously added to give a range of protein and energy intakes. Live-weight gain was increased by 0·12 lb/day for each 0·1 lb additional digestible crude protein/day at levels of intake below 0·7 lb/day and by 0·03 lb/day at higher levels. It was increased by 0·4 lb/day for each additional 0·1 lb starch equivalent daily/100 lb live weight at total intakes below 0·9 lb daily/ 100 lb and by 0·2 lb/day at higher levels. Over the range 0·5–2·0 lb digestible crude protein daily and 0·7–1·2 lb starch equivalent daily/100 lb live weight the effects of these nutrients were additive.

A Latin square nitrogen balance trial demonstrated that a portion of the nitrogen from a protein supplement was retained in the body despite the excretion of the greater part of it in the urine and a further part in the faeces. Nitrogen retention was increased by a supplement of readily available energy through a decrease in urinary nitrogen loss. Nitrogen balance was not increased by a supplement of a fibrous energy source because this induced an increase in faecal nitrogen loss.

In a further feeding trial milk yield was found to be affected in a similar manner to growth. At a yield of 30 lb/day the response per lb starch equivalent added to the diet was 0·5 lb milk including 0·05 lb solids not fat and to an increase of 0·1 lb digestible crude protein daily it was 0·25 lb milk including 0·025 lb solids not fat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1965). The nutrient requirements of farm livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Technical Reviews and Summaries. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Annison, E. F. & Lewis, D. (1959). Metabolism in the Rumen. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D. G. (1968). The amount and physical form of feed and milk secretion in the cow. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 27, 5765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bailey, G. L. & Broster, W. H. (1957). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. I. Protein requirements of yearling stock. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 435–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C. & Campling, R. C. (1961). Utilization of urea by milking cows. J. Dairy Res. 28, 157–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C.Bartlett, S. & Johnson, V. W. (1951). Apparatus for the separate collection of faeces and urine from cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 41, 98101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, C. C., Johnson, V. W. & Machin, C. (1962). Housing and equipment for balance studies with cows. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59, 355–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Price, H. A. (1945). Experiments on the use of home-grown foods for milk production. V. The protein requirements of growing dairy heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 36, 301–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Wood, W. A. (1951). The nutrition of the young Ayrshire calf. 4. Some factors affecting the biological value of protein determined by nitrogen-balance methods. Br. J. Nutr. 5, 5567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L., Clapperton, J. L. & Wainman, F. W. (1966). Utilization of the energy and protein of the same diet by cattle of different ages. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 67, 6775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, V. R., Wade, M. A. & Torell, C. R. (1962). Effect of dietary fat and graded levels of alfalfa on growth and tissue lipids of the bovine. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 241–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohman, V. R., Lesperance, A. L., Wade, M. A., Torell, C. R. & Speth, C. F. (1963). Effect of energy source and level of alfalfa pellets on growth and tissue lipids of beef calves. J. Anim. Sci. 22, 7781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, S. (1945). Bio-Energetics and Growth. New York: Reinhold.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Sutton, J. D., Tuck, Valerie J. & Balch, C. C. (1965). The effect of the addition of large amounts of cod-liveroil to the rations of yearling heifers on their rate of liveweight gain. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 227–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Tuck, Valerie J. (1962). Protein requirements of heifers weighing 800–900 lb. Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy, p. 44.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H. & Tuck, Valerie J. (1963). Protein requirements of heifers weighing 800–900 lb. Rep. natn. Inst. Res. Dairy, p. 48.Google Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuck, Valerie J. & Balch, C. C. (1963). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. IV. Protein requirements of 2-year-old heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60, 393–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Tuck, Valerie J. & Balch, C. C. (1964). Experiments on the nutrition of the dairy heifer. V. Nutrition in late pregnancy. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 63, 51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broster, W. H., Broster, Valerie J. & Smith, T. (1969). Effect on lactation performance of level of feeding in early and in mid-lactation. J. agric Sci., Camb. (in the Press),Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957a). The influence of level of feeding during lactation upon the yield and composition of milk. Dairy Sci. Abstr. 19, Col. 435–54.Google Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1957b). The effect of variations in nutrient intake on the yield and composition of milk. I. Variations in the amount and type of concentrates fed in winter rations. J. Dairy Res. 24, 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, A. W. A. (1966). The nutritive value of ground and pelleted barley straw. 1. Ground and pelleted v. long straw for growing Ayrshire heifers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 66, 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calloway, D. N. & Spector, M. (1954). Nitrogen balance as related to caloric and protein intake in young active men. A.m. J. clin. Nutr. 2, 405–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. (1961). Protein synthesis in the rumen. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of the Ruminant. Ed. Lewis, D.. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. (1963). The significance of the digestion of protein within the rumen on the nutrition of the animal. In Progress in Nutrition and Allied Sciences. Ed. Cuthbertson, D. P.. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I. & Synge, R. L. M. (1954). The digestion of protein and nitrogenous compounds in ruminants. Adv. Protein Chem. 9, 93120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clanton, D. C., Zimmerman, D. R. & Matsushima, J. (1961). Growth and production in beef heifers as affected by protein and energy intake during gestation. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 20, 928.Google Scholar
Clarke, Eileen M. W., Ellinger, Gabrielle M. & Phillipson, A. T. (1966). The influence of diet on the nitrogenous components passing to the duodenum and through the lower ileum of sheep. Proc. R. Soc. B 166, 63–79.Google Scholar
Durham, R. M., Ellis, G. F. & Stovell, R. (1963). Studies of protein and energy levels in rations for young pregnant heifers in drylot. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 22, 835.Google Scholar
Elliot, R. C., Reed, W. D. C. & Topps, J. H. (1964). Studies of protein requirements of ruminants. IV. Live-weight changes of two breeds of African cattle given three levels of dietary protein each with varying amounts of digestible energy. Br. J. Nutr. 18, 519–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Algeo, J. W. & Gordon, R. S. (1961). Effect of protein-energy on steer performance and rumen volatile fatty acids. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 20, 931.Google Scholar
Fontenot, J. P., Gallup, W. D. & Nelson, A. B. (1965). Effect of added carbohydrate on the utilization by steers of nitrogen in wintering rations. J. Anim. Sci. 14, 807–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Mitchell, H. H. (1941a). The value of urea in the synthesis of protein in the paunch of the ruminant. I. In maintenance. J. Nutr. 22, 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, L. E. & Mitchell, H. H. (1941b). The value of urea in the synthesis of protein in the paunch of the ruminant. II. In growth. J. Nutr. 22, 183–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. (1953). The effect of quality and quantity of carbohydrate and protein in the ration on the digestibility of cellulose and other constituents of the ration, with a note on the effect of adding vitamins of the B-complex on the digestibility and retention of the nutrients of a hay ration. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 43, 281–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, M. J. & Murdoch, J. C. (1965). The influence of supplements of flaked maize on the digestibility by steers of silage, fresh lucerne and lucerne hay. J. Br. Grassld Soc. 20, 106–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, M., Mckiddie, G. & Macleod, N. A. (1967). Studies on the protein requirements of beef cattle receiving high energy diets. Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, xviii.Google Scholar
Lamming, G. E. & Swan, H. (1967). The winter feeding of yarded beef cattle. In Progress in Livestock Nutrition 1962–1967. Tech. Bull. U.S. Feed Grains Council. London: Vale Press.Google Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P., Loosli, J. K. & Maynard, L. A. (1951). The influence of energy intake on the nitrogen retention of growing heifers. J. Dairy Sci. 34, 911–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofgreen, G. P. & Otagaki, J. K. (1960). The net energy of blackstrap molasses for fattening steers as determined by a comparative slaughter technique. J. Anim. Sci. 19, 392403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, V. S., Miles, Vern & Haskell, S. R. (1959). The effect of relative protein and energy content of dairy rations on production and composition of milk. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 39, 226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsushima, J., Rice, R. W., Dowe, T. W. & Adams, C. H. (1957). Protein-energy ratios for fattening cattle. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 16, 1053.Google Scholar
Mitchell, H. H., Hamilton, T. S. & Haines, W. T. (1940). The utilization by calves of energy in rations containing different percentages of protein and glucose supplement. J. agric. Res. 61, 847–64.Google Scholar
Munro, H. N. (1964). General aspects of the regulation of protein metabolism by diet and by hormones. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, vol. 1. Ed Munro, H. N. & Allison, J. B.. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Cunningham, H. M. & Friend, W. D. (1962a). The addition of buffers to ruminant rations. II. Additional observations on weight gains efficiency of gains and consumption by steers of all concentrate rations. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 7581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholson, J. W. G., Cunningham, H. M. & Friend, W. D. (1962b). The addition of buffers to ruminant rations. III. The effect of additions of sodium bicarbonate, sodium propionate, limestone and cod liver oil on apparent digestibility and nitrogen retention of an all-concentrate ration. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 42, 82–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, S. C. (1952). Some new designs of latin square type. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 14, 101–6.Google Scholar
Raleigh, R. J. & Wallace, J. D. (1962). Response of weaner calves to various levels of energy and protein supplementation. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 21, 668.Google Scholar
Reid, D. & Holmes, W. (1956). Winter feeding of dairy cows. III. The influence on milk yield of high and low protein concentrates, each fed at two levels in addition to dried grass and grass silage. J. Dairy Res. 23, 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. J. & Forbes, T. J. (1967). A study of the protein requirements of the mature breeding ewe. II. Protein utilization in the pregnant ewe. Br. J. Nutr. 21, 879–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rook, J. A. F., Balch, C. C., Campling, R. C. & Fisher, L. J. (1963). The utilization of acetic, propionic and butyric acids by growing heifers. Br. J. Nutr. 17, 399406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rook, J. A. F. & Line, C. (1961). The effect of the plane of energy nutrition of the cow on the secretion in milk of the constituents of the solids-not-fat fraction and on the concentrations of certain blood plasma constituents. Br. J. Nutr. 15, 109–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaw, J. C. (1961). The nutritional physiology of the rumen. Hauptbericht, 8th Int. Congr. Anim. Prod., Hamburg, p. 2953.Google Scholar
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B., & Gaston, Helen J. (1967a). The effect of protein content of the concentrate mixture on the performance of calves weaned at an early age. Anim. Prod. 9, 721.Google Scholar
Stobo, I. J. F., Roy, J. H. B. & Gaston, Helen J. (1967b). Further studies on the effect of protein content of the concentrate mixture on the performance of calves weaned at an early age. Anim. Prod. 9, 2333.Google Scholar
Tagari, H., Dror, Y., Ascarelli, I. & Bondi, A. (1964). The influence of levels of protein and starch in rations of sheep on the utilization of protein. Br. J. Nutr. 18, 333–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, V. J., Nottle, M. C., Moir, R. J. & Underwood, E. J. (1953). Ruminal flora studies in the sheep. IV. The influence of varying dietary levels of protein and starch upon digestibility, nitrogen retention, and the free micro-organisms of the rumen. Aust. J. Biol. Sci. 6, 142–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchester, C. F. & Harvey, W. R. (1961). Protein energy interaction in nutrition and growth of cattle. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 20, 956.Google Scholar
Woodman, H. E. (1957). Rations for livestock. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd Lond., no. 48.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. E., Deeble, F. K. & Neuman, A. L. (1961). Protein requirements and protein-energy inter-relationships in beef cattle finishing rations. J. Anim. Sci. (Abstr.) 20, 958.Google Scholar