Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:42:26.795Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of soil tests for the estimation of available sulphur

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. R. Arora  and
G. S. Sekhon
B. R. Arora
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
G. S. Sekhon
Affiliation:
Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

In a glasshouse experiment, sulphur was applied to 22 soils as 35S-labelled gypsum. Estimates of available sulphur using different extractants were correlated with yield responses and sulphur uptakes by oats. The largest correlation coefficients were obtained with ‘A’ values and sulphur soluble in 0·5 M-NaHC03, 1% NaCl after heating and ammonium acetate–acetic acid. Critical levels of available sulphur obtained by relating these four methods to yield responses were 24·0, 22·0, 11·0 and 10·5 mgS/kg soil respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , February 1977 , pp. 203 - 206
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anon. (1974). Annual Report of the Department of Soils, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, 1973–74, p. 4.Google Scholar
Bardsley, C. E. & Lancaster, J. D. (1960). Determination of reserve and soluble sulphate in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 24, 265–8.Google Scholar
Bray, R. H. (1948). Correlation of soil tests with crop response to added fertilizers and with fertilizer requirement. In Diagnostic Techniques for Soils and Crops, pp. 53–86. The American Potash Institute.Google Scholar
Chaudhry, I. A. & Cornfield, A. H. (1966). Determination of total sulphur in soil and plant material. Analyst 9, 528–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chesnin, L. & Yien, C. H. (1951). Turbidimetrio determination of available sulphates. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 15, 149–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chopra, S. L. & Kanwar, J. S. (1966). Availability of sulphur in the sandy loam soil of Ludhiana. The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 36, 278–84.Google Scholar
Ensminger, L. E. (1954). Some factors affecting the adsorption of sulphate by Alabama soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 18, 259–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, C. A. & Rost, C. O. (1945). Total organic sulphur and humus sulphur of Minnesota soils. Soil Science 59, 125–37.Google Scholar
Fox, R. L., Olsen, R. A. & Rhoades, H. F. (1964). Evaluating the sulphur status of soils by plant and soil tests. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 28, 243–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freney, J. R. (1958). Determination of water soluble sulphate in soils. Soil Science 86, 241–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fried, M. & Dean, L. A. (1953). A concept concerning the measurement of available nutrients. Soil Science 73, 263–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furmann, A. O. (1969). Use of Isotopes in Biology and Agriculture. Moscow: Moscow Agricultural Academy.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. M. & Ulrich, A. (1959). Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. California Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 766, 57–8.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. V. & Baker, G. O. (1959). Sulphur studies in North Idaho soils using radio sulphur. Soil Science 88, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilmer, V. J. & Nearpass, D. C. (1960). The determination of available sulphur in soils. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 24, 337–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massoumi, A. & Cornfield, A. M. (1963). A rapid method for determining sulphate in water extracts of soil. Analyst 88, 321–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nearpass, D. C., Fried, M. & Kilmer, V. J. (1961). Greenhouse measurement of available sulphur using radioactive sulphur. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 25, 287–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, G. W. & Caldwell, A. C. (1968). Sulphur supplying capacity of soils and the relationship to soil type. Soil Science 105, 355–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, S. & Koehler, F. E. (1968). Extractable and plant available sulphur using radioactive sulphur. Soil Science 106, 53–9.Google Scholar
Ulrich, A. & Hills, F. J. (1967). Principle and practices of plant analysis in soil testing and plant analysis. Part II. Special Publication Soil Science Society America, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.Google Scholar
Venkateswarlu, J. & Subbiah, B. V. (1969). A comparison of several procedures for estimating the sulphur status of rice soils. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 17, 155–9.Google Scholar
Virmani, S. (1971). Comparative efficiency of different methods for evaluating available sulphur in soils. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 44, 119–25.Google Scholar
Williams, C. H. & Steinbergs, A. (1959). Sulphur fraction as chemical indices of available sulphur in some Australian soils. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 10, 340–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar