Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T23:39:14.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluation of phosphate fertilizers: II. Residual value of nitrophosphates, Gafsa rock phosphate, basic slag and potassium metaphosphate for potatoes, barley and swedes grown in rotation, with special reference to changes in soil phosphorus status

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

G. E. G. Mattingly
G. E. G. Mattingly
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The residual value of three nitrophosphates, potassium metaphosphate, basic slag and rock phosphate was compared with that of superphosphate in two experiments with potatoes, barley and swedes grown in rotation. The residual value of the fertilizers was also compared with that of (a) six cumulative annual dressings of superphosphate supplying either one-half or the same total amounts of phosphate and (b) single fresh applications of superphosphate applied once in each rotation. Yields and phosphorus uptakes are discussed in relation to the amounts of soil phosphate soluble in 0·5 M-NaHCO3.

In the first rotation residues of rock phosphate produced about 1 ton/acre less potato tubers than residues of other fertilizers and cumulative annual applications of superphosphate produced 0·6–0·9 tons/acre less tubers than all residues except rock phosphate. In the second rotation residues of fertilizers increased tuber yields less than cumulative dressings of superphosphate. Over two rotations mean yields from residues and from cumulative dressings were the same. Mean yields of barley over two rotations were 1–3 cwt/acre greater from residues than from cumulative annual dressings; the residual value of the different phosphates was the same. For swedes residues from the alternative phosphates, including basic slag and rock phosphate, were equivalent to those from superphosphate and gave the same mean yields as six cumulative dressings of superphosphate broadcast at planting.

Average residual values of alternative phosphate fertilizers, calculated from (a) yield response, (b) P uptake, and (c) soil analysis were: superphosphate, 100; nitrophosphates, 100–102; potassium metaphosphate, 95; basic slag, 94; Gafsa rock phosphate, 92. Mean percentage ‘fresh’ superphosphate equivalents of residues from all fertilizers were 17 and 26% after the first rotation and 11 and 15% after the second rotation for potatoes and swedes respectively.

The percentage of the total variance in crop yields accounted for by linear regression on NaHCO3-soluble P ranged from 38 to 70% for potatoes, 9 to 28% for barley grain and 42 to 92% for swedes. Mean yields of the crops increased by 0·24 ± 0·037 tons/acre (potatoes), 0·22 ± 0·08 cwt/acre (barley) and 1·16 ±0·148 tons/acre (swedes) for each ppm NaHCO3-soluble phosphorus in the soil at harvest.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 70 , Issue 2 , April 1968 , pp. 139 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crowther, E. M. & Warren, R. G. (1934). The fertilizer value of basic slags and other phosphates. Agric. Prog.. 11, 99–105.Google Scholar
Devine, J. B. & Holmes, M. R. J. (1964). Field experiments on the phosphate requirements of spring wheat and barley. Expl Husb. no. 11, 88–97.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. (1957). Effects of radioactive phosphate fertilizers on yield and phosphorus uptake by ryegrass in pot experiments on calcareous soils from Rothamsted. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 49, 160–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. (1963). The agricultural value of some water and citrate soluble fertilizers; an account of recent work at Rothamsted and elsewhere. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 75, 57–97.Google Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. & Widdowson, F. V. (1963). Residual value of superphosphate and rock phosphate on an acid soil. I. Yields and phosphorus uptakes in the field. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 60, 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattingly, G. E. G. & Penny, A. (1968). Evaluation of phosphate fertilizers. I. Immediate value of dicalcium phosphate, nitrophosphates, Gafsa rock phosphate, basic slag and potassium metaphosphate for barley and ryegrass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 131–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, J. D. D. (1967). Watering techniques in glasshouse experiments. Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn for 1966, p. 62.Google Scholar
Mulder, E. G. (1953). Investigations on the agricultural value of nitrophosphate and anhydrous ammonia. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 25, 3–43.Google Scholar
Patterson, H. D. & Williams, R. (1962). The residual effects of phosphorus fertilizers on yields of arable crops: preliminary results of six rotation experiments. Expl Husb. no. 8, 85–103.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1955). Fourcourse rotation. Summary of results 1930–1954 Rep. Rothamsted exp. Stn. for 1954, pp. 153–6.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1960–5). Numerical results of the field experiments. Residual phosphate rotation, 60/B/9; 61/B/8; 62/B/8; 63/B/8; 64/B/7 and 65/B/7.Google Scholar
Russell, R. D. (1965). Phosphate relationships of calcareous soils. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric. Fish. Fd no. 13 Soil Phosphorus, pp. 130–41. London: H. M. S. O.Google Scholar
Tisdale, S. L. & Rucker, D. L. (1964). Crop response to various phosphates. Tech. Bull. no. 9. The Sulphur Institute, Washington and London.Google Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J. (1963). The agricultural evaluation of nitrophosphates with particular reference to direct and cumulative phosphate effects and to interaction between water-solubility and granule size. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 75, 5–54.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. (1956). NPK residues from fertilizers and farmyard manure in long-term experiments at Rothamsted. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 37, 3–24.Google Scholar
Warren, R. G. & Johnston, A. E. (1960). The Exhaustion Land site. An account of experiments made before and during the period of soil exhaustion. Rep. Rothamsted. exp. Stn for 1959, pp. 230–9.Google Scholar
Williams, E. G. (1950). Phosphate fixation and availability. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 1, 244–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar