Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:14:14.006Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Environment and genetic factors affecting wool production from sub-tropical coarse wool sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. M. Aboul-Naga
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
E. A. Afifi
Affiliation:
Animal Production Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt

Summary

Wool production from different flocks of Ossimi, Rahmani and Barki Egyptian local sheep, raised at six different locations in the country was studied. Different genetic parameters for greasy fleece weight of the three breeds were estimated.

Location was of significant effect on annual greasy fleece weight of Rahmani sheep only. With the adjustment for differences in yield percentages, differences in clean wool production from one location to another were slight for the three breeds. Age of ewe was of highly significant effect on annual greasy fleece weight.

Heritability estimates of annual greasy fleece weight of the ewes were found to be generally low in the three breeds (range 0·00–0·34). The estimates differed markedly with age; those of the yearling fleece weight of Rahmani and Barki ewes were the highest, being 0–19 and 0–34, respectively.

Repeatability estimates of annual greasy fleece weight were also low, being 0·11–0·04 and 0·29 for Ossimi, Rahmani and Barki ewes, respectively.

Estimates of genetic correlation between yearling greasy fleece weight of the Ossimi and Rahmani ewes and their weaning and yearling body weights were high and positive. Those between annual greasy fleece weight of the ewes and their reproductive performance traits differed greatly in the two breeds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aboul-Naga, A. M. (1976). Reproductive performance of three indigenous breeds of sheep raised at different locations in Egypt. Indian Journal of Animal Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Aboul-Naga, A. M. (1976). Lamb performance of three indigenous breeds of sheep raised at different locations in Egypt. Indian Journal of Animal Science (in the Press).Google Scholar
Becker, W. A. (1967). Manual Procedures in Quantitative Genetics. 2nd ed., Washington State University.Google Scholar
Brown, G. H. & Turner, H. N. (1968). Response to seleotion in Australian Merino sheep. II. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters for some production traits in Merino ewes and an analysis of the possible effects of selection on them. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 303–22.Google Scholar
Burfening, P. J., Van Horn, J. L. & Blackwell, R. L. (1971). Genetic and phenotypio parameters including occurrence of estrus in Rambouillet ewe lambs. Journal of Animal Science 33, 919–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, R. C., Carman, G. M., Mcclaugherty, F. S. & Haydon, P. S. (1971). Genotype-environment interaction in sheep. 1. Ewe productivity. Journal of Animal Science 33, 656–62.Google Scholar
Dunlop, A. A. (1962). Interaction between heredity and environment in Australian Merino. 1. Strain x location interaction and wool traits. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 13, 503–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, M. H., Galal, E. S. E., Ghanem, Y. S. & Khishin, S. S. (1969). Genetic parameters of Barki sheep raised under semi-arid conditions. Animal Production 11, 561–7.Google Scholar
Haii, T. H., Ruttle, J. L. & Sldwell, G. M. (1964). Some genetic and phenotypic parameters in Navajo and Navajo crossbred yearling ewes. Journal of Animal Science 23, 485–9.Google Scholar
Kadry, A. E. (1971). Heritability and repeatability of some physical wool characteristics of Barki. M.Sc. Thesis, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Arab Republic of Egypt.Google Scholar
Karam, H. A. (1959). Fleece weight in Rahmani sheep. Alexandria Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 221—31.Google Scholar
Kenedy, J. P. (1967). Genetic and phenotypic relationship between fertility and wool production in 2-year-old Merino sheep. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 18, 515–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morley, F. H. W. (1951). Selection for economic characters in Australian Merino sheep. 1. Estimates of phenotypic and genetic parameters. New South Wales Department of Agricultural Science Bulletin 73.Google Scholar
Morley, P. H. W. (1955). Selection for eoonomio characters in Australian Merino Sheep. V. Further estimates of phenotypic and genetio parameters. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 6, 7790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullaney, P. D., Brown, G. H., Young, S. S. Y. & Hyland, P. G. (1970). Genetic and phenotypio parameters for wool characters in fine-wool Merino, Corriedale and Polwarth sheep. II. Phenotypio and genetic correlations, heritability and repeatability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 21, 527—40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, G. H. S. (1960). Comparison of estimates of repeatability and heritability for some production traits in Merino rams and ewes. I. Repeatability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, N. H. & Dolling, G. H. S. (1960). Comparison of estimates of repeatability and heritability for some production traits in Merino rams and ewes. II. Heritability. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 11, 604–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, G. H. S. (1963). Selection for fertility in Australian Merino. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 14, 460–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, S. S. Y., Brown, G. H., Turner, H. N. & Dolling, G. H. S. (1965). Genetic and phenotypio parameters for body weight and greasy fleeoe weight at weaning in Australian Merino. Australian Journal of Agriculture Research 16, 9971009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar