Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T20:43:55.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The efficiency of the nitrogen in cattle slurry acidified with nitric acid for grass production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 1997

R. J. STEVENS
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agriculture and Environmental Science Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK The Queen's University of Belfast, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
R. J. LAUGHLIN
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Agriculture and Environmental Science Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
C. J. O'BRIC
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, Department of Agricultural and Environmental Science, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
O. T. CARTON
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Johnstown Castle Research Centre, Wexford, Ireland
J. J. LENEHAN
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Grange Research Centre, Dunsany, Ireland

Abstract

Field trials were conducted at six sites throughout Ireland in 1992, 1993 and 1994, to assess the efficiency of utilization of N in cattle slurry treated with nitric acid. Slurries were left untreated or were acidified to pH 5·5 with 12 m nitric acid immediately prior to spreading. Slurries were either band-spread or splashplate-spread using an automated tanker system. The efficiency of N (NH+4-N+NO3-N) in slurry for grass production (Eff-N%) was measured by comparing N offtake values with those from a range of rates of inorganic fertilizer N (ammonium nitrate/calcium carbonate) treatments. Slurry was applied at rates (13–28 m3/ha) which supplied N (NH+4-N+NO3-N) below the highest inorganic fertilizer treatment. In all experiments, untreated cattle slurry was compared with nitric acid-treated cattle slurry at the same rate of application. The Eff-N% values for unacidified or acidified slurries were highly variable by both spreading methods. The effect of spreading method depended on whether or not the slurry was acidified. On average the Eff-N% value of the band-spread unacidified slurry (59%) was significantly higher than the Eff-N% value of the splashplate-spread slurry (37%). For acidified slurry, the average Eff-N% value of the band-spread slurry (85%) was not significantly different from the Eff-N% value of the splashplate-spread slurry (81%). The overall average Eff-N% value of the acidified slurry was 83% which was significantly less than 100%. Cattle slurry acidified with nitric acid to pH 5·5 was more variable and less efficient than inorganic fertilizer N under the soil and climatic conditions tested.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)