Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:13:48.151Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of tributyrin supplementation on short-chain fatty acid concentration, fibrolytic enzyme activity, nutrient digestibility and methanogenesis in adult Small Tail ewes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2018

Q. C. Ren
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
J. J. Xuan
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
Z. Z. Hu
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
L. K. Wang*
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
Q. W. Zhan
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
S. F. Dai
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
S. H. Li
Affiliation:
Anhui Science and Technology University, Fengyang 233100, People's Republic of China
H. J. Yang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
W. Zhang*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, People's Republic of China
L. S. Jiang
Affiliation:
Beijing Key Laboratory of Dairy Cow Nutrition, Beijing University of Agriculture, Beijing 102206, People's Republic of China
*
Author for correspondence: L. K. Wang, E-mail: [email protected] and W. Zhang, E-mail: [email protected]
Author for correspondence: L. K. Wang, E-mail: [email protected] and W. Zhang, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In vivo and in vitro trials were conducted to assess the effects of tributyrin (TB) supplementation on short-chain fatty acid (SFCA) concentrations, fibrolytic enzyme activity, nutrient digestibility and methanogenesis in adult sheep. Nine 12-month-old ruminally cannulated Small Tail ewes (initial body weight 55 ± 5.0 kg) without pregnancy were used for the in vitro trial. In vitro substrate made to offer TB at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 g/kg on a dry matter (DM) basis was incubated by ruminal microbes for 72 h at 39°C. Forty-five adult Small Tail ewes used for the in vivo trial were randomly assigned to five treatments with nine animals each for an 18-d period according to body weight (55 ± 5.0 kg). Total mixed ration fed to ewes was also used to offer TB at 0, 2, 4, 6 and 8 g/kg on a DM basis. The in vitro trial showed that TB supplementation linearly increased apparent digestibility of DM, crude protein, neutral detergent fibre and acid detergent fibre, and enhanced gas production and methane emissions. The in vivo trial showed that TB supplementation decreased DM intake, but enhanced ruminal fermentation efficiency. Both in vitro and in vivo trials showed that TB supplementation enhanced total SFCA concentrations and carboxymethyl cellulase activity. The results indicate that TB supplementation might exert advantage effects on rumen microbial metabolism, despite having an enhancing effect on methanogenesis.

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdl-Rahman, MA (2010) In vitro manipulation of rumen fermentation efficiency by fumaric acid-bentonite coupled addition as an alternative to antibiotics. Journal of Agriculture Science (Canada) 2, 174180.Google Scholar
AOAC (2012) Official Methods of Analysis, 19th Edn. Gaithersburg, MD, USA: AOAC International.Google Scholar
Allison, MJ (1969) Biosynthesis of amino acids by ruminal microorgnisms. Journal of Animal Science 29, 797807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, G, Terré, M, Mereu, A, Ipharraguerre, IR and Bach, A (2016) Effects of supplementing a milk replacer with sodium butyrate or tributyrin on performance and metabolism of Holstein calves. Animal Production Science 56, 18341841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aschenbach, JR, Penner, GB, Stumpff, F and Gäbel, G (2011) Ruminant nutrition symposium: role of fermentation acid absorption in the regulation of ruminal pH. Journal of Animal Science 89, 10921107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barker, HA (1961) The Bacteria. New York, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Britton, R and Krehbil, C (1993) Nutrient metabolism by gut tissues. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 21252131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burrin, DG and Britton, RA (1986) Response to monensin in cattle during subacute acidosis. Journal of Animal Science 63, 888893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, ZX and Breitman, TR (1994) Tributyrin: a prodrug of butyric acid for potential clinical application in differentiation therapy. Cancer Research 54, 34943499.Google ScholarPubMed
Chen, XL, Wang, JK, Wu, YM and Liu, JX (2008) Effects of chemical treatments of rice straw on rumen fermentation characteristics, fibrolytic enzyme activities and populations of liquid- and solid- associated ruminal microbes in vitro. Animal Feed Science and Technology 141, 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohoe, DR, Garge, N, Zhang, X, Sun, W, O'Connell, TM, Bunger, MK and Bultman, SJ (2011) The microbiome and butyrate regulate energy metabolism and autophagy in the mammalian colon. Cell Metabolism 13, 517526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilloteau, P, Zabielski, R, David, JC, Blum, JW, Morisset, JA, Biernat, M, Wolinski, J, Laubitz, D and Hamon, Y. (2009) Sodium-butyrate as a growth promoter in milk replacer formula for young calves. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 10381049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilloteau, P, Martin, L, Eeckhaut, V, Ducatelle, R, Zabielski, R and Van Immerseel, F (2010) From the gut to the peripheral tissues: the multiple effects of butyrate. Nutrition Research Reviews 23, 366384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamer, HM, Jonkers, D, Venema, K, Vanhoutvin, S, Troost, FJ and Brummer, RJ (2008) Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Alimentary Pharmacology and Therapeutics 27, 104119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huhtanen, P, Miettinen, H and Ylinen, M (1993) Effect of increasing ruminal butyrate on milk yield and blood constituents in dairy cows fed a grass silage-based diet. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 11141124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kowalski, ZM, Górka, P, Flaga, J, Barteczko, A, Burakowska, K, Oprządek, J and Zabielski, R (2015) Effect of microencapsulated sodium butyrate in the close-up diet on performance of dairy cows in the early lactation period. Journal of Dairy Science 98, 32843291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lane, MA, Baldwin RL, IV and Jesse, BW (2002) Developmental changes in ketogenic enzyme gene expression during sheep rumen development. Journal of Animal Science 80, 15381544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, RW, Wu, S, Baldwin, RL VI, Li, W and C, Li (2012) Perturbation dynamics of the rumen microbiota in response to exogenous butyrate. PLoS ONE 7, e29392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, CR and Bilous, D (1982) Location and kinetic properties of the cellulase system of Acetivibrio celluloyticus. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 28, 11581164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malhi, M, Gui, H, Yao, L, Aschenbach, JR, Gäbel, G and Shen, Z (2013) Increased papillae growth and enhanced short-chain fatty acid absorption in the rumen of goats are associated with transient increases in cyclin D1 expression after ruminal butyrate infusion. Journal of Dairy Science 96, 76037616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menke, KH and Steingass, H (1988) Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development 28, 755.Google Scholar
Mrazek, J, Tepsic, K, Avgustin, G and Kopecný, J (2006) Diet-dependent shifts in ruminal butyrate-producing bacteria. Folia Microbiologica 51, 294298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NRC (2001) Nutrition Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Orskov, ER (1975) Manipulation of rumen fermentation for maximum food utilisation. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 22, 152182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajak, B, Orzechowski, A and Gajkowska, B (2007) Molecular basis for sodium butyrate-dependent proapoptotic activity in cancer cells. Advances in Medical Sciences 52, 8388.Google ScholarPubMed
Santra, A, Karimo, SA and Chaturvedi, H (2007) Rumen enzyme profile and fermentation chararacteristics in sheep as affected by treatment with sodium lauryl sulfate as defaunating agent and presence of ciliate protozoa. Small Ruminant Research 67, 126137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sorensen, V and Schambye, P (1955) Apparatur til udtagelse af vomindhold. (equipment for rumen fluid collection). Dansk Veterinary Therapeutics 38, 6063.Google Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Carbohydrate methodology, metabolism, and nutritional implications in dairy cattle: methods for dietary fibre, neutral detergent fibre, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y, Zhang, Y, Wang, J and Meng, L (2009) Effects of volatile fatty acid concentrations on methane yield and methanogenic bacteria. Biomass and Bioenergy 33, 848853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, HJ, Tamminga, S, Williams, BA, Dijkstra, J and Boer, H (2005) In vitro gas and volatile fatty acids production profiles of barley and maize and their soluble and washout fractions after feed processing. Animal Feed Science and Technology 120, 125140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, DF and Yang, HJ (2011) In vitro ruminal methanogenesis of a hay-rich substrate in response to different combination supplements of nitrocompounds; pyromellitic diimide and 2-bromoethanesulphonate. Animal Feed Science and Technology 163, 2032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar