Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:21:06.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of sowing date, sowing density and nitrogen supply on leaf extension in spring barley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. A. S. Maan ,
D. Wright  and
M. B. Alcock
A. A. S. Maan
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
D. Wright
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
M. B. Alcock
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, University College of North Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Three pot experiments were performed in unheated glasshouses at the University College of North Wales College Farm, Aber, Gwynedd in 1980–1983. Two experiments tested the effects of sowing date and N supply, the third sowing density and nitrogen supply. Extension growth of main-stem leaves was measured by ruler and expressed in thermal time units to allow comparisons between sowing dates. Rate and duration of leaf extension were determined from linear regressions of leaf length against thermal time.

Increasing N supply increased leaf extension rate but had no significant effects on leaf extension duration. Leaf extension rate increased with leaf position on the main shoot, but decreased slightly in leaves extending at the time of stem elongation. Leaf extension duration also increased with leaf position on the main shoot and was related to mean temperature during the leaf extension phase. Plants sown in September were able to compensate for lower radiation receipts by having a faster rate and longer duration of leaf extension, by producing larger leaves with a greater specific lamina area and by partitioning a greater proportion of extension growth into lamina and less into sheaths. In plants sown in June, the largest leaf occurred at a lower stem node and leaves emerging later showed a strong response to N. It is suggested that this is attributable to earlier onset of internal competition for assimilates. Variation in leaf extension rate was the main factor influencing variation in final leaf area. There was a strong positive relationship between leaf extension rate and leaf N content.

Increasing sowing density increased the area of the first four leaves on the main shoot and decreased that of later leaves, changes mainly associated with changes in leaf extension duration. It is concluded that progress in the modelling of leaf area expansion, light interception and dry matter production requires more information about how sowing date, sowing density and N supply interact to influence crop development and leaf growth.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 305 - 315
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon, (1966). Smithsonian Meteorological Tables. Washington: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Baker, C. K. & Gallagher, J. N. (1983). The development of winter wheat in the field. 2. The control of primordium initiation rate by temperature and photoperiod. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 85–95.Google Scholar
Baker, N. R., Davies, W. J. & Ong, C. K. (EDS) (1985). The Control of Leaf Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, A., Greenwood, D. J. & Cleaver, T. J. (1976). A dynamic model for the effects of potassium and nitrogen fertilizers on the growth and nutrient uptake of crops. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 225–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bunting, A. H. & Drennan, D. S. H. (1966). Some aspects of the morphology and physiology of cereals in the vegetative phase. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses (Eds Milthorpe, F. L. & Ivins, J. D.), pp. 20–38. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Dale, J. E. (1965). Leaf growth in Phaseolus vulgaris. 2. Temperature effects and the light factor. Annals of Botany 29, 293–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dale, J. E. & Milthorpe, F. L. (EDS) (1983). The Growth and Functioning of Leaves. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C. (1966). The effect of light and temperature on the growth of cereals. In The Growth of Cereals and Grasses (Eds Milthorpe, F. L. & Ivins, J. D.), pp. 181–199. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Friend, D. J. C, Helson, V. A. & Fisher, J. E. (1962). Leaf growth in Marquis wheat, as regulated by temperature, light intensity and daylength. Canadian Journal of Botany 40, 1299–1311.Google Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. (1979). Field studies of cereal leaf growth. 1. Initiation and expansion in relation to temperature and ontogeny. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 625–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N. & Biscoe, P. V. (1978). Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. & Tunnicliffe Wilson, G. (1982). Leaf appearance and extension in field-grown winter wheat plants: the importance of soil temperature during vegetative growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, J. L. & Allen, E. J. (1986). Development in barley (Hordeum sativum). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 187–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemp, D. R. & Blacklow, W. M. (1982). The responsiveness to temperature of the extension rates of leaves of wheat growing in the field under different levels of nitrogen fertilizer. Journal of Experimental Botany 33, 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. (1977). The growth of the shoot apex and the apical dome of barley during ear initiation. Annals of Botany 41, 1297–1308.Google Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M., Appleyard, M. & Fellowes, G. (1982). Effect of sowing date on the temperature response of leaf emergence and leaf size in barley. Plant, Cell and Environment 5, 477–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, E. J. M. & Faris, D. G. (1972). The effect of plant density on tiller growth and morphology in barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 281–288.Google Scholar
Ludlow, M. M. (1983). External factors influencing photosynthesis and respiration. In The Growth and Functioning of Leaves (Eds Dale, J. E. & Milthorpe, F. L.), pp. 347–380. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Milford, G. F. J., Pocock, T. O., Jaggard, K. W., Biscoe, P. V., Armstrong, M. J., Last, P. J. & Goodman, P. J. (1985). An analysis of leaf growth in sugar beet. IV. The expansion of the leaf canopy in relation to temperature and nitrogen. Annals of Applied Biology 107, 335–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milthorpe, F. L. (1956). The Growth of Leaves. Proceedings of 3rd Easter School in Agricultural Science, University of Nottingham. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ong, C. K. & Baker, C. K. (1985). Temperature and leaf growth. In The Control of Leaf Growth (Eds Baker, N. R., Davies, W. J. & Ong, C. K.), pp. 175–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, J. R. (1984). A model of canopy development in winter wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 383–392.Google Scholar
Robson, J. J. & Deacon, M. J. (1978). Nitrogen deficiency in small closed communities of S. 24 ryegrass. II. Changes in the weight and chemical composition of single leaves during their growth and death. Annals of Botany 42, 1119–1213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, H. (1983). Analysis of the nitrogen response of leaf extension in Lolium temulentum seedlings. Annals of Botany 51, 363–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D. J. (1947). Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. II. The effect of varying nutrient supply on net assimilation rate and leaf area. Annals of Botany 11, 375–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weir, A. H., Bragg, P. L., Porter, J. R. & Rayner, J. H. (1984). A winter wheat crop simulation model without water or nutrient limitations. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 102, 371–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, D. & Hughes, Ll. G. (1987). Relationships between time, temperature, daylength and development in spring barley. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar