Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:58:52.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of separation, dilution, washing and acidification on ammonia volatilization from surface-applied cattle slurry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Stevens ,
R. J. Laughlin  and
J. P. Frost
R. J. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
R. J. Laughlin
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, Food and Agricultural Chemistry Research Division, Newforge Lane, Belfast BT9 5PX, UK
J. P. Frost
Affiliation:
Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland, Hillsborough, Co. Down BT26 6DR, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Treatments which lowered the rate of ammonia volatilization from surface-applied cattle slurry were evaluated in three field experiments during 1989/90 at the Agricultural Research Institute of Northern Ireland. The relative effects of separation, dilution with water before application and washing with a water spray after application, on ammonia volatilization rates were compared over 4 days using ventilated enclosures. As the loss rate of ammonia during the first 4 days after application was highly correlated with the loss rate over the first 4 hours after application, the loss rate in the first 4 hours was used as a rapid method to assess the efficacy of various combinations of separation, dilution and acidification. Ammonia volatilization loss rates from treatment combinations were compared to the loss rate from whole slurry.

A 50% decrease in ammonia volatilization was achieved by separation through a 0·4 mm mesh, separation through a 10·0 mm mesh plus dilution with 86% by volume of water, or separation through a 2·0 mm mesh plus washing with 53% by volume of water.

A 75% decrease in ammonia volatilization was achieved by acidification to pH 6·5, or combinations of separation and dilution, namely separation through a 0·4 mm mesh plus 50% dilution or separation through a 5·0 mm mesh plus 100% dilution.

A 90% decrease in ammonia volatilization was achieved by acidification to pH 6·0, dilution by 50% plus acidification to pH 6·5, or separation through a 0·4 mm mesh plus acidification to pH 6·5.

The effects of separation and acidification on ammonia volatilization were cumulative. There was a highly significant inverse linear relationship between ammonia volatilization rate and volume of nitric acid used. Adding 10 M nitric acid at 1·4% by volume lowered volatilization by 75% of that from whole slurry and increased the nitrogen content of the slurry by 2 g N/l, making it a more balanced NPK fertilizer for cut swards. Because the variable value of cattle slurry is due to loss of nitrogen as ammonia and smothering of the sward with slurry solids, a combination of separation or dilution to lower sward contamination and acidification with nitric acid to lower volatilization may be the best practical option for improving cattle slurry as a fertilizer for cut grass.

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 119 , Issue 3 , December 1992 , pp. 383 - 389
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Avnimelech, Y. & Laher, M. (1977). Ammonia volatilization from soils: equilibrium considerations. Soil Science Society of America Journal 41, 1080–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Department Of Agriculture For Northern Ireland (1986). Annual Report on Research, Development and Technical Work, p. 29. Belfast: HMSO.Google Scholar
Frost, J. P., Stevens, R. J. & Laughlin, R. J. (1990). Effect of separation and acidification of cattle slurry on ammonia volatilization and on the efficiency of slurry nitrogen for herbage production. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 115, 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Husted, S., Jensen, L. S. & Jørgensen, S. S. (1991). Reducing ammonia loss from cattle slurry by the use of acidifying additives: the role of the buffer system. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 57, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Japenga, J. & Harmsen, K. (1990). Determination of mass balances and ionic balances in animal manure. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 38, 353–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, S. C. & Pain, B. F. (1990). Ammonia volatilisation from agricultural land. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society No. 298.Google Scholar
Lockyer, D. R., Pain, B. F. & Klarenbeek, J. V. (1989). Ammonia emissions from cattle, pig and poultry wastes applied to pasture. Environmental Pollution 56, 19–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1986). Profitable Use of Farm Manures. Booklet 2081. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry Of Agriculture, Fisheries And Food (1988). Fertiliser Recommendations for Agricultural and Horticultural Crops. Reference Book 209. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Pain, B. F., Phillips, V. R., Clarkson, C. R. & Klarenbeek, J. V. (1989). Loss of nitrogen through ammonia volatilisation during and following the application of pig or cattle slurry to grassland. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 47, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pain, B. F., Thompson, R. B., Rees, Y. J. & Skinner, J. H. (1990). Reducing gaseous losses of nitrogen from cattle slurry applied to grassland by the use of additives. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 50, 141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prins, W. H. & Snijders, P. J. M. (1987). Negative effects of animal manures on grassland due to surface spreading and injection. In Animal Manure on Grassland and Fodder Crops (Eds Meer, H. G. Van Der, Unwin, R. R., Dijk, T. A. Van & Ennik, G. G.), pp. 119–135. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schechtner, G., Tunney, H., Arnold, G. H. & Keuning, J. A. (1980). Positive and negative effects of cattle manure on grassland with special reference to high rates of application. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production (Eds Prins, W. W. & Arnold, G. G.), pp. 77–93. Wageningen: Pudoc.Google Scholar
Sommer, S. G. & Olesen, J. E. (1991). Effects of dry matter content and temperature on ammonia loss from surface-applied cattle slurry. Journal of Environmental Quality 20, 679–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J., Laughlin, R. J. & Frost, J. P. (1989). Effect of acidification with sulphuric acid on the volatilization of ammonia from cow and pig slurries. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 113, 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, T. A. (1968). The effect of age, dilution and rate of application of cow and pig slurry on grass production. Record of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture, Northern Ireland 17 (1), 67–90.Google Scholar
Tecator Application Note (1984). Determination of ammonia nitrogen in soil samples extractable by 2 m KCl using flow injection analysis. AN 65/83.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Ryden, J. C. & Lockyer, D. R. (1987). Fate of nitrogen in cattle slurry following surface application or injection to grassland. Journal of Soil Science 38, 689–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Pain, B. F. & Lockyer, D. R. (1990 a). Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland. I. Influence of mechanical separation, changes in chemical composition during volatilization and the presence of the grass sward. Plant and Soil 125, 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, R. B., Pain, B. F. & Rees, Y. J. (1990 b). Ammonia volatilization from cattle slurry following surface application to grassland. II. Influence of application rate, wind speed and applying slurry in narrow bands. Plant and Soil 125, 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunney, H., Molloy, S. & Codd, F. (1980). Effects of cattle slurry, pig slurry and fertiliser on yield and quality of grass silage. In Effluents from Livestock (Eds Gasser, J. K. R., Hawkins, J. J., O'callaghan, J. R. & Pain, B. B.), pp. 327–343. London: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Unwin, R. J., Pain, B. F. & Whinham, W. N. (1986). The effect of rate and time of application of nitrogen in cow slurry on grass cut for silage. Agricultural Wastes 15, 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vlek, P. L. G. & Stumpe, J. M. (1978). Effects of solution chemistry and environmental conditions on ammonia volatilization losses from aqueous systems. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 416–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, C. J. & Stevens, R. J. (1986). The sulphur content of slurries and fertilisers. Record of Agricultural Research, Department of Agriculture, Northern Ireland 34, 5–7.Google Scholar