Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:59:16.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of row spacing and the control of pests and pathogens on four cultivars of spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. McEwen  and
D. P. Yeoman
J. McEwen
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
D. P. Yeoman
Affiliation:
Agricultural and Food Research Council, Institute of Arable Crops Research, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Experiments in 1986–88 compared the spring field bean cultivars Alfred, Minden, Ticol and Troy, grown on clay-with-flints soil at Rothamsted, at row spacings of 12 and 48 cm, and compared two pest and pathogen control programmes based on (i) ‘standard’ control of Ascochyta fabae, Ditylenchus dipsaci and seed-borne viruses and (ii) ‘enhanced’ control of Sitona lineatus, bean leaf roll virus via the vector Acyrthosiphon pisum, Botrytis fabae and Uromyces viciae-fabae in addition to the pests and pathogens in the ‘standard’ control.

With standard control, Minden had the largest mean seed yield of 4·6 t/ha; with enhanced control, Alfred was best with 6·1 t/ha.

The yield benefits of enhanced control ranged from 0·2 t/ha on Ticol in 1986 to 2·4 t/ha on Alfred in 1988. They were related to the control of weevils (S. lineatus), chocolate spot (B. fabae) and rust (U. viciae-fabae). At 1989 prices, the cost of materials used for enhanced control would be repaid by a yield increase of 0·3 t/ha.

The closer row spacing increased yields by 0·15 t/ha on average but effects differed greatly between years. Benefits were largest in 1986 when plants were shortest and in that year were largest for the shorter cultivars.

It is suggested that trials of field bean cultivars should always include a test of pest and pathogen control.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 365 - 371
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anon. (1976). Chocolate spot, Botrytis fabae Sardina and B. cinerea Fr. disease assessment key No. 4.1.1. Manual of Plant Growth Stages and Disease Assessment Keys. Alnwick: Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food.Google Scholar
Cockbain, A. J. (1980). Viruses of spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba) in Great Britain. In Vicia faba: Feeding Value, Processing and Viruses (Ed. Bond, D. A.), pp. 297–308. Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Heathcote, G. D. & Gibbs, A. J. (1962). Virus diseases in British crops of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Plant Pathology 11, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hebblethwaite, P. D., Hawtin, G. C. & Lutman, P. J. W. (1983). The husbandry of establishment and maintenance. In The Faba Bean (Vicia faba L.). A Basis for Improvement (Ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.), pp. 271–312. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. J. (1984). Observations on stem nematode, Ditylenchus dipsaci, attacking field beans. Rothamsted Report for 1983, Part 2, 239–260.Google Scholar
McEwen, J., Bardner, R., Bater, J. E., Cockbain, A. J., Fletcher, K. E., Lapwood, D. H., Salt, G. A., Webb, R. M., Williams, T. D. & Yeoman, D. P. (1985). Control of pests and pathogens of spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba L.). Research and Development in Agriculture 2, (3) 177–185.Google Scholar
Moffatt, J. R. (1967). The effect of chalk on soil pH and the yield of beans. Rothamsted Report for 1966, 240–247.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1981). Recommended varieties of cereals 1981. Farmers Leaflet No. 8.Google Scholar
National Institute of Agricultural Botany (1988). Recommended varieties of field beans 1988. Farmers Leaflet No. 10.Google Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1986, 1987, 1988). Varieties, row spacing and plant health. Yields of the Field Experiments, 86/R/BE/6, 87/R/BE/4, 88/R/BE/4.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. & Taylor, H. (1977). Yield components and cultivar sowing date and density in field beans (Vicia faba). Annals of Applied Biology, 86, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeoman, D. P., Lapwood, D. H. & McEwen, J. (1987). Effects of a range of fungicides used to control rust (Uromyces viciae-fabae) on spring-sown field beans (Vicia faba) in the UK. Crop Protection 6, (2) 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar