Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:40:37.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of plant population density and rectangularity on the growth and yield of poppies (Papaver somniferum)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Chung
B. Chung
Affiliation:
Department of Primary Industry, PO Box 303, Devonport, Tasmania 7310, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Growth, yield and incidence of lodging of poppies were studied in Tasmania at 10–200 plants/m2 and at nominal rectangularities (within-row: between-row spacing) ranging from 1:1 to 10:1. In 1983/84 and 1988/89, there were asymptotic relationships between plant population density and both total dry-matter production and total head (capsule plus seed) yield at maturity. In 1983/84, a season with above-average wind, the incidence of lodging increased as density increased to > 50 plants/m2; morphine concentration decreased as density increased to > 100 plants/m2. This resulted in parabolic relationships between yield of erect (machine-harvestable) heads and yield of morphine from erect heads with plant density, the maximum morphine yield from erect heads being achieved at 70 plants/m2. In 1988/89, a season with below-average wind, the effects of lodging were less severe at high densities and the components of ‘erect’ yield were adequately fitted by an asymptotic function. Rectangularity of 1:1 gave higher total dry matter production, total head yield, yield of erect heads and morphine yield from erect heads than 4:1 and 10:1. Since calm conditions similar to those of 1988/89 occur only once in every 4 years, growers should be encouraged to establish c. 70 plants/m2. As most commercial crops in Tasmania are drilled in 150–175 mm rows, growing at 70 plants/m2 to maximize the effect of plant density would also approximate to the ideal rectangularity (2:1 in this case).

Type
Crops and Soils
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , October 1990 , pp. 239 - 245
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bechyne, B. (1965). The effect of spacing on the biological and production properties of poppies (Papaver somniferum L). Rostlinná Výroba 11, 1289–1300.Google Scholar
Chung, B. (1987). The effect of irrigation on the growth and yield components of poppies (Papaver somniferum L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 389–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frappell, B. D. (1979). Competition in vegetable crop communities. Journal of the Australian Institute of Agricultural Science 45, 211–217.Google Scholar
Gillis, P. R. & Ratokowsky, D. A. (1978). The behaviour of estimators of the parameters of various yield-density relationships. Biometrics 34, 191–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holliday, R. (1960). Plant population and crop yield. Nature 186, 22–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laughlin, J. C. (1987). The effect of nitrogen top-dressing and plant density on the yield and lodging of poppies (Papaver somniferum L.). Acta Horticulturae 208, 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northcote, K. H. (1979). A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils, 4th Edn.Glenside, South Australia: Rellim Technical Publications.Google Scholar
Papp, I. & Jozsa, L. (1965). The influence of plant spacing and arrangement on poppy yields. Debreceni Agrartud 11, 75–83. (from Horticultural Abstracts 58, Abst 6298).Google Scholar
Pride, R. & Stern, E. S. (1954). A specific method for the determination of morphine. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology 6, 590–606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Turkhede, B. B., De, R., Ramanathan, V. S. & Ram, Sewa (1981). Effects of N and P rates and plant densities on the opium, morphine and seed yield of opium poppy. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 51, 659–662.Google Scholar
Willey, R. W. & Heath, S. B. (1969). The quantitative relationship between plant population and crop yield. Advances in Agronomy 21, 281–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yadav, R. L., Mohan, R., Singh, R. & Gupta, M. M. (1983). Effect of sowing date, population density and row spacing on growth and yield of opium poppy in north central, sub-tropical India. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar