Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T10:39:37.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of inflorescence removal on seed yield performance of field beans (Vicia faba) under different shading treatments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

W. Aufhammer  and
I. Götz-Lee
W. Aufhammer
Affiliation:
Institute for Agronomy and Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 7000 Stuttgart 70, German Federal Republic
I. Götz-Lee
Affiliation:
Institute for Agronomy and Crop Science (340), University of Hohenheim, Fruwirthstr. 23, 7000 Stuttgart 70, German Federal Republic
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Effects of inflorescence removal under different plant densities and degrees of shading on seed yield of field beans (Vicia faba L.) were investigated. Two indeterminate cultivars were used in field experiments for two seasons (1985 and 1986). The hierarchy within the generative storage system of field bean plants was manipulated by removal of inflorescences at various growth stages and nodes.

Removal of the inflorescences of nodes 1–3 (counted from the base upwards) caused about 30% loss of seed yield potential compared with the control but compensatory increases in seed yield were found, differing with plant density and duration of shading. Under favourable growing conditions (no shading, 20 plants/m2), overcompensation occurred, giving a mean seed yield up to 40% more than in controls.

Removal of all inflorescences above the ninth flowering node did not significantly reduce seed yield as plants completely compensated for the restriction on yield imposed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 113 , Issue 3 , December 1989 , pp. 317 - 323
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alvey, N. G., Branfield, C. F., Baxter, R. I., Gower, J. C, Krzanowski, W. J., Lane, P. W., Leech, P. K., Nelder, J. A., Payne, R. W., Phelps, K. M., Rogers, C. E., Ross, G. J. S., Simpson, H. R., Todd, A. D., Wedderburn, R. W. M. & Wilkinson, G. N. (1980). Genstat Manual Pan I & II. Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, UK: Lawes Agricultural Trust.Google Scholar
Aufhammer, W., Götz, I. & Peter, M. (1987). Yield performance of field beans (Vicia faba L.) in relation to interactions between inflorescences at different nodes. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 108, 479–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aufhammer, W. & Peter, M. (1988). Untersuchungen zur Nutzbarkeit des generativen Speicherpotentials von indeterminierten Ackerbohnengenotypen (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agronomy & Crop Science 161, 90–100.Google Scholar
Brook, R. M. & Sprent, J. I. (1983). Effects of flower removal on growth in faba beans (Vicia faba L.). FABIS 7, 27–28.Google Scholar
Chapman, G. P., Fagg, C. W. & Peat, W. E. (1979). Parthenocarpy and internal competition in Vicia faba. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 94, 247–255.Google Scholar
Day, J. M. & Legg, B. J. (1983). Water relations and irrigation response. In The Faba Bean (Ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.), pp. 217–224. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Diethelm, R., Keller, E. R. & Bangerth, F. (1988). Auxins, ABA and gibberellin-like activity in abscising and non-abscising fruits of Vicia faba L. Plant Growth Regulation 7, 75–90.Google Scholar
Due, G. & Picard, J. (1981). Study of the fertility components in faba beans. Variability among six different genotypes. Effects of top and flower removal. In Vicia faba – Physiology and Breeding (Ed. Thompson, R.), pp. 283–289. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
El-Nadi, A. H. (1969). Water relations of beans. I. Effects of water stress on growth and flowering. Experimental Agriculture 5, 195–207.Google Scholar
Freye, E. & Schilling, G. (1983). Untersuchungen über die Abhängigkeit der Fruchtbildung bei Ackerbohne von Assimilatbildung und -transport. Archiv für Acker- und Pflanzenbau und Bodenkunde, Berlin 27 (3), 185–190.Google Scholar
Götz-Lee, I. (1988). Zur Ertragsbildung der Ackerbohne (Vicia faba L.) in Abhängigkeit von Beziehungen zwischen den generativen Speicherorganen. Dissertation, Universität Hohenheim.Google Scholar
Jaquiery, R. & Keller, E. R. (1978). Beeinflussung des Fruchtansatzes bei der Ackerbohne (V. faba) durch die Verteilung der Assimilate. Teil II. Angewandte Botanik 52, 261–276.Google Scholar
Jaquiery, R. & Keller, E. R. (1980). Beeinflussung des Fruchtansatzes bei der Ackerbohne (V. faba) durch die Verteilung der Assimilate. Teil II. Angewandte Botanik 54, 29–39.Google Scholar
Kambal, A. E. (1969). Flower drop and fruit set on field beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 72, 131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEwen, J. (1972). Effects of defoliating different zones on the plant of field beans (Vicia faba L.). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 78, 487—490.Google Scholar
Peat, W. E. (1984). Developmental physiology. In The Faba Bean (Ed. Hebblethwaite, P. D.), pp. 103–133. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Peter, M., Aufhammer, W. & Bangerth, F. (1988). Dry matter accumulation at specific pod positions on field bean plants (Vicia faba L.) and possible relations with indoleacetic and abscisic acid levels. Plant Growth Regulation 7, 261–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pommer, G., Breuch-Moritz, M. & Fink, K. (1984). Auswirkungen einer Verbesserung der Strahlungseindringung in Ackerbohnenbestände durch Blattentfernung auf Hülsenansatz und Ertrag. Zeitschrift für Acker- und Pflanzenbau 153, 352–365.Google Scholar
Smith, M. L. (1982). Factors affecting flower abscission in field beans (Vicia faba L. minor). PhD thesis, University of Durham, UK.Google Scholar
Tamaki, K. & Naka, J. (1972). Physiological studies of the growing process of broad bean plants. V. Effects of shading on the growth and the chemical components in the various organs. Technical Bulletin, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University 23 (2), 157–166.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1977). Effect of flower or pod removal on the performance of soya beans. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 89, 229–234.Google Scholar
Tayo, T. O. (1986). Flower and pod production at various nodes of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 29–36.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. & Taylor, H. (1981). Factors limiting growth and yield of Vicia faba. In Vicia faba – Physiology and Breeding (Ed. Thompson, R.), pp. 34–45. Wageningen: Martinus Nijhoff and Commission of European Communities.Google Scholar