Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T07:50:15.510Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of carbohydrate supplements on ruminal concentrations of ammonia in animals given diets of grass silage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. G. Chamberlain ,
P. C. Thomas ,
Wilma Wilson ,
C. J. Newbold  and
J. C. Macdonald
D. G. Chamberlain
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
P. C. Thomas
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
Wilma Wilson
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
C. J. Newbold
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
J. C. Macdonald
Affiliation:
The Hannah Research Institute, Ayr, KA6 5HL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A total of 15 rumen-cannulated sheep and four rumen-cannulated goats (Expt 3) were used in five latin square experiments designed to investigate the effects of carbohydrate supplements on ruminal ammonia concentration in animals given grass silage diets. In Expt 1 barley supplements were given at the same time, 1 h before or 2 h before a meal of silage. The treatments were designed to alter the synchronization between energy release from fermentation of barley and ammonia release from the degradation of silage N compounds. As compared with the unsupplemented control diet, barley supplements reduced (P < 0–05) rumen ammonia concentration and increased (P < 0–01) the number of total protozoa, but the time at which barley was given was without effect. In Expt 2 animals receiving silage or silage-barley diets were defaunated chemically. This treatment led to a 20–25 % reduction in rumen ammonia concentration. In Expt 3 supplements of maize starch, glucose and sucrose were compared. Mean ammonia concentrations were 231 mg/1 for the control unsupplemented diet and 205, 155 and 160 mg/1 (S.E. 21) for the starch, glucose and sucrose treatments. Corresponding numbers of protozoa were 7–7, 15–1, 6–1 and 6–3 x 10s/ml (S.E. 1–8). In Expt 4 the diets were unsupplemented silage or the same diet plus supplements of sucrose or xylose. Xylose reduced ammonia concentration more than sucrose, the values (mg/1) being 236 (control), 206 (sucrose) and 125 (xylose) (S.E. 19). There was no difference between the supplements in numbers of protozoa. Xylose induced a smaller reduction in pH, a higher (P < 0–05) proportion of acetate and a lower (P < 0–05) proportion of butyrate in rumen fluid than did sucrose. Effects of rumen pH were examined in Expt 5 where supplements of sucrose were given alone or together with NaHCO3. Rumen pH values were 6–38 for the control unsupplemented diet and 5–99, 6–28 and 6–55 (S.E. 0–06) for the diets supplemented with sucrose, sucrose plus 50 g NaHC03 and sucrose plus 100 g NaHCO3. Corresponding values for ruminal ammonia were 193, 151, 93 and 41 mg/1 (S.E. 10). Differences in VFA proportions between sucrose treatments were small and significant (P < 0–05) only for butyrate. It is concluded that there are important differences between carbohydrate sources in their effects on nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Differences between starch and sugars appear to relate to the influence of the carbohydrates on the microbial population of the rumen, as was indicated by the differential effects of the carbohydrate sources on the number of total protozoa; differences between sugars appear to depend in part on the rates of sugar fermentation and the associated reduction in rumen pH.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 104 , Issue 2 , April 1985 , pp. 331 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bastley, E. E. & Deyoe, C. W. (1981). Reducing the rate of ammonia release by the use of alternative non-protein nitrogen sources. In Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition(ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 99–114. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, T. H. (1965). Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant (ed. Dougherty, R.W.), pp. 322–334. Washington: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Chalmers, M. I., Grant, I. & White, F. (1976). Nitrogen passage through the wall of the ruminant digestive tract. In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition (ed. Cole, D. J. A., Boorman, K. N., Buttery, P. J., Lewis, D., Neale, R. J. and Swan, H.), pp. 159–179. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G. & Thomas, P. C. (1980). The effects of urea and artificial saliva on rumen bacterial protein synthesis in sheep receiving a high-cereal diet. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 432–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chamberlain, D. G. & Thomas, P. C. (1982). Effect of intravenous supplements of L-methionine on milk yield and composition in cows given silage-cereal diets. Journal of Dairy Research 49, 25–28.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Anderson, F. J. (1980). Rumen fermentation pattern and protozoal counts in sheep given silage and silage and barley diets. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 39 29A.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Anderson, F. J. (1983). Volatile fatty acid proportions and lactic acid metabolism in the rumen in sheep and cattle receiving silage diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 47–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, D. G., Thomas, P. C. & Wait, M. K. (1982). The rate of addition of formic acid to grass at ensilage and the subsequent digestion of the silage in the rumen and intestine of sheep, drass and Forage Science 37, 159–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, G. S. (1975). The interrelationship between rumen ciliate protozoa and bacteria. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant(ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 149–164. Armidale, N.S.W.: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Dewar, W. A. & Mcdonald, P. (1961). Determination of dry matter in silage by distillation with toluene. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 12, 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffiths, T. W. (1982). Effects of supplementation of grass silage on nitrogen retention in growing heifers. In Forage Protein Conservation and Utilization(ed. Griffiths, T. W. and Maguire, M. F.), pp. 219–223. Castleknock, Co. Dublin: Dunsinea Research Centre.Google Scholar
Harrison, D. G., Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J. & Osbourn, D. F. (1975). Manipulation of rumen fermentation in sheep by increasing the rate of outflow of water from the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 85, 93–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, D. G., Beever, D. E., Thomson, D. J. & Osbourn, D. F. (1976). Manipulation of fermentation in the rumen. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 27, 617–620.Google Scholar
Henderickx, H. & Martin, J. (1963). In vitro study of nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. Compte rendu de recherches Institut pour V'encouragement de la recherche scientifique dans Vindustrie et I'agriculture. Bruxelles 31, 1–110.Google Scholar
Kaiser, A. G., Osbourn, D. F. & England, P. (1983). Intake, digestion and nitrogen retention by calves given ryegrass silages: influence of formaldehyde treatment and supplementation with maize starch or maize starch and urea. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, J. V.(1975). Quantitative models of nitrogen metabolism in sheep. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant(ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A. C. I.), pp. 416–431. Armidale, N.S.W.: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Russell, J. B., Sharp, W. M. & Baldwin, R. L. (1979). The effect of pH on maximum bacterial growth rate and its possible role as a determinant of bacterial competition in the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 48, 251–255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, R. H. (1975). Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen and the composition and nutritive value of nitrogen compounds entering the duodenum. In Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant(ed. McDonald, I. W. and Warner, A.C.I.), pp. 399–415. Armidale, N.S.W.: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. (1968). The fermentation of soluble carbohydrates in rumen contents of cows fed diets containing a large proportion of hay. British Journal of Nutrition 22, 689–712.Google Scholar
Syrjala, L. (1972). Effect of different sucrose, starchand cellulose supplements on the utilization of grass silages by ruminants. Agriculturae Fenniae 11, 199–276.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C. (1977). Ruminal fermentation and the flow of nitrogen compounds to the duodenum. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Thomas, P. C., Chamberlain, D. G., Kelly, N. C. & Wait, M. K. (1980). The nutritive value of silages. Digestion of nitrogenous constituents in sheep receiving diets of grass silage and grass silage and barley. British Journal of Nutrition 43, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, P. C. & Hodgson, J. C. (1979). The clearance rate of rumen liquid and rumen fermentation pattern in sheep receiving forage diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 683–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkins, R. J. (1981). The nutritive value of silages. In Recent Developments in Ruminant Nutrition(ed. Haresign, W. and Cole, D. J. A.), pp. 268–282. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar