Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T23:41:36.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of B-9 (N-dimethyl-aminosuccinamic acid) on growth and yield of peanuts (Arachis Hypogaea L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. L. Hammerton
J. L. Hammerton
Affiliation:
Faculty of Agriculture, University of the West Indies, Kingston 7, Jamaica
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Application of B-9 shortened mainstem and branch internodes of several peanut cultivars at all times of application. The numbers of mainstem and branch nodes were little affected by B-9. Interactions between cultivars and B-9 treatments in these vegetative characters were small, inconsistent and generally non-significant. B-9 had inconsistent effects on plant dry weight and did not increase pod yields. In an upright bunch type, podding was more compact, but mean seed dry weight and number of seeds per pod were slightly reduced by B-9.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 86 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 211 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amir, J. (1969). A study on the reproductive stage of the groundnut Arachis hypogaea L. Induction of pod setting in the upper nodal gynaphores. Annals of Botany 33, 333–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. W. & Horden, A. J. (1971). Effect of growth regulators on vegetative and reproductive characters of six peanut genotypes. Journal of the American Peanut Research and Education Association (Incorporated) 3, 75–86.Google Scholar
Brittain, J. A. (1968). Response of Arachis hypogaea L. to succinic acid-l, l-dimethylhydrazide. Dissertation Abstracts 28, 3938B–3939B.Google Scholar
Garren, K. H. (1961). Control of Sclerotium rolfsii through cultural practices. Phytopathology 51, 120–4.Google Scholar
Halevy, A. H., Ashri, A. & Ben Tal, Y. (1969). Peanuts: gibberellin antagonists and genetically controlled differences in growth habit. Science, N. Y. 164, 1397–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartzook, A. & Goldin, E. (1970). Effect of 2,3,5- triiodobenzoic acid (TIBA) on the morphology of three peanut varieties grown in the field. Israel Journal of Agricultural Research 20, 169–71.Google Scholar
Krishnamtjrthy, K. (1967). Differential effects of hormones as foliar applications on the yield of groundnuts. Indian Journal of Science & Industry 1, 79–82.Google Scholar
Wittwer, S. H. (1971). Growth regulants in agriculture. Outlook on Agriculture 6, 205–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, M. W. (1968). The effects of temperature at early flowering on the growth and development of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea). Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 19, 241–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar