Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T09:15:12.095Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effectiveness of some mechanical, thermal and chemical laboratory treatments on the drying rates of leaves and stem internodes of grass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. E. Harris ,
R. Thaine  and
H. I. Marjatta Sarisalo
C. E. Harris
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
R. Thaine
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
H. I. Marjatta Sarisalo
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berks. SL6 5LR
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Drying rates of stem internodes of S. 24 perennial ryegrass and S. 37 cocksfoot, some with leaf sheaths and laminae attached, were measured in controlled conditions of air speed, temperature and relative humidity after exposure for 60 sec to dry heat, steam, steam containing petroleum ether vapour, and petroleum ether vapour only. The last treatment was most effective in increasing the drying rate, but a similar effect was obtained by splitting the stem internodes longitudinally or by removing from the larger plant fragments (internodes with leaf) the leaf sheaths and laminae. Observations on leaves with a scanning electron microscope confirmed that the steam and petroleum treatments acted on the surface waxes thus reducing the cuticular resistance to water loss. The presence of internal tissue resistance was demonstrated by anaerobic treatment of ryegrass leaves and stem internodes to disrupt cell protoplasts. The ensuing increase in drying rate was clearest in stems which have a low surface area to volume ratio. The results suggest that the combination of both mechanical damage and thermal or chemical surface treatment could form the basis for more effective methods of increasing the drying rate in the field of crops cut for conservation.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 83 , Issue 2 , October 1974 , pp. 353 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Byers, G. L. & Routley, D. G. (1966). Alfalfa drying. Overcoming natural barriers. Agricultural Engineering 47, 476–7, 485.Google Scholar
Hall, D. M. & Jones, R. L. (1961). Physiological significance of surface wax on leaves. Nature, London 191, 95–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiatt, A. J. & Lowe, R. H. (1967). Loss of organic acids, amino acids, K and Cl from barley roots treated anaerobically and with metabolic inhibitors. Plant Physiology 42, 1731–6.Google Scholar
Leshem, Y., Thaine, R., Harris, C. E. & Canaway, R. J. (1972). Water loss from cut grass with special reference to haymaking. Annals of Applied Biology 72, 89–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschner, H., Handley, R. & Overstreet, R. (1966). Potassium loss and changes in the fine structure of corn root tips induced by H-ion. Plant Physiology 41, 1725–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mears, D. R. & Roberts, W. J. (1969). Methods of accelerating forage drying. Annual Meeting 1969 American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper 69–162, Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, Indiana (mimeo).Google Scholar
Minson, D. J., Raymond, W. F. & Harris, C. E. (1960). Studies in the digestibility of herbage. VIII. The digestibility of S37 cocksfoot, S23 ryegrass and S24 ryegrass. Journal of The British, Grassland Society 15, 174–80.Google Scholar
Philipsen, P. J. J. (1969). Methods of drying and changes in the crop especially after killing the standing crop by thermal treatment. Proceedings of the 3rd General Meeting of the European Grassland Federation, Braunschweig, pp. 77–80.Google Scholar
Possingham, J. V. (1972). Surface wax structure in fresh and dried sultana grapes. Annals of Botany 36, 993–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Possingham, J. V., Chambers, T. C., Radler, F. & Grncarevic, M. (1967). Cuticular transpiration and wax structure and composition of leaves and fruit of Vitis vinifera. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences 20, 1149–53.Google Scholar
Pripke, E. H. & Bruhn, H. D. (1969). Altering physical characteristics of alfalfa to increase drying rate. Annual Meeting 1969 American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Paper 69–143, Purdue Univ., W. Lafayette, Indiana (mimeo).Google Scholar
Shepherd, W. (1964). Paths and mechanisms of moisture movements in detached leaves of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). 1. Losses of petiole moisture direct from petioles and via laminae. Annals of Botany 28, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaine, R. & Harris, C. E. (1973). Formic acid as a desiccant for grass leaves. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 349–51.Google Scholar
Weatherley, P. E. (1950). Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytologist 49, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar