Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:36:03.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of various levels of infestation by the seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.) on the seed yield of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. B. Free ,
A. W. Ferguson  and
Susan Winfield
J. B. Free
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
A. W. Ferguson
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Susan Winfield
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

To determine economic thresholds of pest infestation caged plots of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) were infested with different populations of the seed weevil (Ceutorhynchus assimilis Payk.). Less than one seed weevil per plant resulted in pod infestation levels of seed weevil larvae that by themselves were insufficient to warrant insecticide application, but owing to secondary infestation of pod midge (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.), substantial seed loss occurred. Greater populations of seed weevil adults gave correspondingly larger levels of pod midge and diminishing yields.

In commercial crops individual plants were able to compensate, and even to overcompensate for damage resulting from low levels of pest infestation, but increasing levels of infestation resulted in progressively fewer seeds per plant.

The implications of the results on pest control and further research are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , December 1983 , pp. 589 - 596
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alford, D. V. & Gould, H. J. (1975). Surveys of pest incidence on oil-seed rape in the United Kingdom. Proceedings of the 8th British Insecticides and Fungicides Conference, pp. 489–495.Google Scholar
Akkeesmit, G. W. (1956). The biology and control of the colza seed-pod weevil (Ceuthorhynchus assimilis Payk.) and the brassica pod midge (Dasyneura brassicae Winn.). Instituut voor Plantenziektenkundig Onderzaek Wageningen. Mededelingen 132, 59.Google Scholar
Barnes, H. F. (1946). Gall midge of economic importance. I. Gall Midges of Root and Vegetable Crops. London: Crosby, Lockwood and Son.Google Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, I. H. (1978a) A survey of the damage caused to crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by insect pests in south-central England and their effect on seed yield. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, I. H. (1978b). The responses of the pollen beetle, Meligethea aeneus, and the seed weevil, Ceuthorhynckus assimilis, to oil-seed rape, Brassica napus, and other plants. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 761–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, I. H. (1979a). The infestation of crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) by insect pests. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Free, J. B. & Williams, I. H. (1979b). The distribution of insect pests on crops of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) and the damage they cause. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 139–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, H. J. (1975). Surveys of pest incidence on oilseed rape in south-central England. Annals of Applied Biology 79, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, C. W. (1981). Pests of oilseed rape and their control. Oilseed Rape Book (ed. Green, C.), pp. 97–106. Cambridge Agricultural Publishing.Google Scholar
Kirchner, H. A. (1960). Moglichkeiten zur kurzfristigen Voranssage des Auffretens der Kohlschotenmücke (Perrisia (Dasyneura) brassicae Winn.) und Beziehungen des Mückenschlupfes zu Witterungsfaktoren. Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift der Universität Rostock (math.-nat. Reike) 15, 275–282.Google Scholar
Kühne, W. (1967). Zur Befallsvertenlung der Kohlschotengallmucke Dasyneura brassicae Winnertz in grossflachigen Bestanden (Diptera: Itonididae). Beiträge zur Entomologie 17, 287–297.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1976). Oil-seed rape. Short Term Leaflet, no. 76.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). Oilseed rape. Booklet 2278.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1982). Insect pests of oilseed rape. Leaflet 780.Google Scholar
Stevenson, J. H. (1955). Observations on the oviposition of the seed pod midge Dasyneura brassicae Winn, on colza. Tijdschrift over Plantenzieten 61, 81–87.Google Scholar
Sylvén, E. (1949). Skidgallmyggan Dasyneura brassicae (Winn.). Slatens Växtskyddanstalt. Meddelande, no. 54, 120 pp.Google Scholar
Tatchell, G. M. (1983). Compensation in spring-sown oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) plants in response to injury to their flower buds and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thiem, E. (1970). Die Bedeutung der Feldrandbenhandlung für der Bekämpfung von Dasyneurabrassicae Winn. (Dipt., Cecidomyiidae) und Ceuthorrhynchus assimilis Payk. (Col., Curculionidae) im bliihenden Raps und der Einfluss dieser Insektizidmassnahme auf das Vorkommen von Trichomalua perfeclus Walker (Hym., Chalcidoidea) an den Larven des Kohlschotenrusslers. Archiv filr Phytopathologie und Pflanzenschulz 6, 83–98.Google Scholar
Thygesen, T. (1962). Om muligheden for en mere effektiv bekaempelse af rapsens alvorligste skadedyr, skulpegelmyggen (Dasyneura brassicae). Ugeskrift for Landmaend 15, 7 pp.Google Scholar
Williams, I. H. & Free, J. B. (1978). The feeding and mating behaviour of pollen beetles (Meligethes aeneus Fab.) and seed weevils (Ceutorhynch/us assimilis Payk.) on oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L). Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 91, 453–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, I. H. & Free, J. B. (1979). Compensation of oil-seed rape (Brassica napus L.) plants after damage to their buds and pods. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar