Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:58:45.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of thermal and mechanical treatment on the drying rates of leaves and flowering stem internodes of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) measured in the laboratory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

C. E. Harris
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
R. Thaine
Affiliation:
The Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR

Summary

The drying rate of leaves and stem internodes from flowering culms of two varieties of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) were measured in the laboratory in controlled conditions of temperature (28 °C), relative humidity (22%) and air speed (40 cm/sec), without treatment, or after being subjected to thermal treatment or to mechanical damage followed by thermal treatment. The two treatments increased the drying rate of leaves and, to a greater extent, stem internodes.

While it cannot be concluded that all treatments that increase crop drying rate will increase the rate for stems more than for leaves, these results are considered to indicate the possibility of devising practical treatments which will. Such treatments could reduce leaf shatter and consequent serious loss of dry matter during the field drying of grass crops.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Gheenhill, W. L. (1959). Respiration drift of harvested pasture plants during drying. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 10, 495501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, C. E., Thaine, R. & Sabisalo, M. (1974). Effectiveness of some mechanical, thermal and chemical laboratory treatments on the drying rates of leaves and stem internodes of grass. The Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 83, 353–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunt, I. V. (1962). Productivity, persistence and response to nitrogen of Italian ryegrass varieties. Journal of the British Grassland Society 17, 125–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, J. & Chestnutt, D. M. B. (1968). Measurement of dry-matter losses in grass during the wilting period. (2) The effects of rain, mechanical treatment, maturity of grass and some other factors. Record of Agricultural Research 17, 5965.Google Scholar
Leshem, Y., Thaine, R., Harris, C. E. & Canaway, R. J. (1972). Water loss from out grass with special reference to hay-making. Annals of Applied Biology 72, 89104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mears, R. & Roberts, W. J. (1969). Methods of accelerating forage drying. Ann. meeting Amer. soc. Agric. Engineers. Purdue University, W. Lafayette, Indiana.Google Scholar
Shepperson, G. (1965). Quick haymaking machinery and methods. Outlook on Agriculture 4, 259–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weatherley, P. E. (1950). Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytologist 49, 8197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, D. D. & Carson, E. W. (1973). Respiration during drying of alfalfa herbage. Crop Science 13, 660–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar