Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T03:21:46.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of the nitrogen content of residues from leys on amounts of available soil nitrogen and on yields of wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. J. Heard
A. J. Heard
Affiliation:
Grassland Research Institute, Hurley, Berkshire
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Leys that lasted 3½ years, including grass/white clover, grass alone, white clover alone, lucerne alone, and lucerne/cocksfoot, and also including leys managed for seed production, were followed by two successive crops of winter wheat and then by marrow-stem kale. The first wheat crop that followed grazed leys of white clover, lucerne, or lucerne/cocksfoot yielded 32 cwt. of grain (dry matter)/acre, after cocksfoot or timothy/red clover seed-production leys the yield was 21 cwt./acre. The corresponding weights of N in the wheat were 105 and 57 lb./acre.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , June 1965 , pp. 329 - 334
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Babtholomew, W. V. (1954). Soil Microbiology Conference, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Bbadfield, R. (1954). Soil Microbiology Conference, Purdue University.Google Scholar
Bizzell, J. A. & Leland, E. W. (1945). Bull. Cornell Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 817.Google Scholar
Clement, C. R. (1959). Ph.D. Thesis, Reading University.Google Scholar
Clement, C. R. & Williams, T. E. (1962). J. Soil Sci. 13, 82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, D. B. (1955). Biometrics, 11, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grassland Reseabch Institute (1957). Expts. in Progr. 91, 33.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute (1959). Expts. in Progr. 11, 54.Google Scholar
Grassland Research Institute (1960). Expts. in Progr. 12, 44.Google Scholar
Janssen, S. L. (1958). K. lantbr. Hogslc. Ann. 24, 101.Google Scholar
Newton, J. D., Wyatt, F. A., Ignatieff, V. & Ward, A. S. (1939). Ganad. J. Res. 17, 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orchard, E. R. (1933). Ph.D. Thesis, London University.Google Scholar
Parbery, N. H. & Swaby, R. J. (1942). Agr. Gaz. N.S. Wales, 53, 357.Google Scholar
Sears, P. D. & Evans, L. T. (1953). N.Z. J. Sci. Tech. 35A (Suppl. 1), 42.Google Scholar
Williams, T. E. & Baker, H. K. (1957). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 12, 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, T. E., Clement, C. R. & Heard, A. J. (1960). Proc. 8th Int. Grassl. Congr. p. 237.Google Scholar
Wolton, K. M. (1955). J. Brit. Grassl. Soc. 10, 240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar