Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:44:19.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of the amount and form of roughage in the diet on digestibility of whole maize grain in cows and steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. Nordin  and
R. C. Campling
M. Nordin
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
R. C. Campling
Affiliation:
Wye College (University of London), Ashford, Kent TN25 5AH
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Four experiments investigated some of the factors affecting the digestion of whole maize grain in non-lactating cows and yearling steers. With steers, but not cows, maize in diets containing small amounts of hay (14%) and large amounts of whole grain were better digested than those with 37 or 48% hay. The higher digestibility of maize in steers was associated with a greater time spent ruminating per kg feed and a longer retention time of maize in the gut than in cows. Replacing long roughage with ground and pelleted roughage in diets for steers improved the digestion of whole maize but not as well as reducing the hay to 14% of the diet. Finely grinding the maize produced a large increase in digestibility of the feed in cows and steers and both digested it to the same extent. It was concluded that the motility of the reticulo-rumen during eating and ruminating largely determines the extent of the digestion of whole maize grain.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 87 , Issue 1 , August 1976 , pp. 213 - 219
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balch, C. C. (1950). Factors affecting the utilization of food by dairy cows. 1, The rate of passage of food through the digestive tract. British Journal of Nutrition 4, 361–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batch, C. C. (1971). Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristics of roughages. British Journal of Nutrition 26, 383–92.Google Scholar
Castle, E. J. (1956). The rate of passage of food-stuffs through the alimentary tract of the goat. British Journal of Nutrition 10, 15–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christian, K. R. & Coup, M. R. (1954). Measurement of feed intake by grazing cattle. 6. The determination of chromic oxide in faeces. New Zealand Journal of Science and Technology 36, 328–30.Google Scholar
Clegg, K. M. (1956). The application of the anthrone reagent to the estimation of starch in cereals. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 7, 40–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crampton, E. W. & Maynard, L. A. (1938). The relation of cellulose and lignin content to the nutritive value of animal feeds. Journal of Nutrition 15, 383–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fordyce, J. & Kay, M. (1974). A note on the effect of polyethylene particles on rumen metabolism of steers. Animal Production 18, 105–8.Google Scholar
Hale, W. H. & Theurer, C. B. (1972). Feed preparation and processing. In Digestive Physiology and Nutrition in Ruminants. 3. Practical Nutrition (ed. Church, D. C.), pp. 49–76. Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.: Church.Google Scholar
Hixon, D. H., Hatfield, E. E. & Lamb, P. E. (1969). Comparison of whole shelled corn with cracked corn in cattle finishing diets. Journal of Animal Science 29, 161–2.Google Scholar
Horton, G. M. J. & Holmes, W. (1975). Feeding value of whole and rolled propionic acid-treated highmoisture corn for beef cattle. Journal of Animal Science 40, 706–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, R. R. (1972). Feedstuffs utilized by ruminants in Digestive Physiology and Nutrition of Ruminants. 3. Practical Nutrition (ed. Church, D. C.), pp. 9–34. Corvallis, Oregon, U.S.A.: Church.Google Scholar
Kick, C. H., Gerlaugh, P., Schalk, A. F. & Silver, A. E. (1937). The effect of mechanical processing on the mastication and rumination of steers. Journal of Agricultural Research 55, 587–97.Google Scholar
Morrison, F. B. (1956). Feeds and Feeding. 22nd ed.Clinton, Iowa: The Morrison Publ. Co.Google Scholar
Nordin, M. & Campling, R. C. (1974). Digestibility of whole maize in cattle. Proceedings of the British Society of Animal Production 3, 102.Google Scholar
Pitzen, D. F., Cooper, C. C. & Burroughs, W. (1971). Starch digestion, whole vs. rolled corn for cattle. Journal of Animal Science 33, 1169 (Abstr.).Google Scholar
Schalk, A. F. & Amadon, R. S. (1928). Physiology of the ruminant stomach (bovine). Study of the dynamic factors. North Dakota Agricultural Experimental Station Bulletin 216.Google Scholar
Sullivan, J. T. (1962). Methods for the analysis of forage plants with particular reference to carbohydrate constituents. United States Department of Agriculture, Publication CR-81–62.Google Scholar
Vance, R. D., Preston, R. L., Klosterman, E. W. & Cahill, V. R. (1972). Utilization of whole shelled and crimped corn grain with varying proportions of corn silage by growing-finishing steers. Journal of Animal Science 35, 598–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. W., Hembry, F. G. & Reynolds, W. L. (1972). Influence of grinding, supplemental nitrogen source and roughage on the digestibility of corn. Journal of Animal Science 34, 672–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, G. F., Adeeb, N. N. & Campling, R. C. (1973). Apparent digestibility of maize grain when given in various physical forms to adult sheep and cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 259–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar