Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:57:04.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of sward surface height on herbage intake and performance of lactating ewes lambed in winter and continuously stocked on pasture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

S. T. Morris ,
S. N. McCutcheon ,
W. J. Parker  and
H. T. Blair
S. T. Morris
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
S. N. McCutcheon
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
W. J. Parker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Horticultural Systems Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
H. T. Blair
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Thirty-six 4-year-old Border Leicester × Romney (BR), Poll Dorset × BR (PBR) and Suffolk × BR (SBR) ewes balanced for litter size were assigned, 6 days after the mid-point of lambing (29 June 1989), to one of three sward surface height (SSH) treatments replicated twice (six ewes/1 ha paddock). The mean SSH during the 54 days of the trial were 2·6, 4·4 and 7·8 cm. Herbage organic matter intake (OMI) was measured using intraruminal chromium controlled release capsules during weeks 3, 4, 7 and 8 of lactation. Ewe OMI was not influenced by SSH during week 3 of lactation. During weeks 4 and 7 of lactation, ewe OMI increased with SSH up to a SSH of 7·8 cm. In week 8 of lactation there was no significant difference in OMI between ewes grazing the 4·4 or 7·8 cm SSH treatments, suggesting maximum intake at this stage of lactation is reached at 4·4 cm SSH. A maximum OMI of 2·6±0·1 and 3·0±0·1 kg OM/ewe per day (P < 0·05) was reached in week 4 of lactation on the 4·4and 7·8 cm SSH treatments, respectively. Ewes grazing the 2·6 cm swards had a relatively constant OMI throughout the experiment (range 1·8±0·1 to 2·0±0·1 kg OM/ewe per day). However, these ewes lost 10·5 kg of liveweight while those on the 4·4 and 7·8 cm SSH treatments maintained a constant liveweight. Sward surface height had no effect on ewe midside wool growth rate or mean fibre diameter (measured at day 60 of lactation) or on lamb liveweight gain. Ewe breed cross had no effect on ewe OMI or midside wool growth. Lambs reared by SBR ewes were heavier (20·4±0·5 kg) at day 60 of lactation than lambs reared by PBR (18·7±0·6 kg) or BR (18·4±0·6 kg) ewes (P < 0·05). These results suggest that for Winter(June)-lambing ewes in good condition a SSH of 4·0 cm under continuous stocking should ensure near to maximum ewe and lamb performance. However, ewes in good body condition at lambing stocked on a SSH down to 3 cm will rear lambs to acceptable weaning weights but at the expense of ewe liveweight loss and possible long-term carry-over effects on future productionif compensatory weight gains are not achieved during the spring pasture growth period.

Type
Animals
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 122 , Issue 3 , June 1994 , pp. 471 - 482
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allden, W. G. (1979). Feed intake, diet composition and wool growth. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth (Eds Black, J. L. & Reis, P. J.), pp. 61–78. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Barthram, G. T. (1986). Experimental techniques: the HFRO sward stick. In Biennial Report 1984–85, pp. 29–30. Penicuik: Hill Farming Research Organisation.Google Scholar
Bigham, M. L. (1974). Effects of shearing interval on fleece weight and wool growth on a delineated midside patch. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 17, 407–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chestnutt, D. M. B. (1992). Effect of sward surface height on the performance of ewes and lambs continuously grazed on grass/clover and nitrogen-fertilized grass swards. Grass and Forage Science 47, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, D. A. & Hodgson, J. (1986). Techniques to estimate botanical composition of diet samples collected from oesophageal fistulates. Mimeograph, DSIR,Palmerston North.Google Scholar
Clark, D. A., Lambert, M. G. & Grant, D. A. (1986). Influence of fertiliser and grazing management on North Island moist hill country. 5. Animal production. New Zealand Journal of Agicultural Research 29, 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, J. L. (1979). Variation in wool growth with physiological state. In Physiological and Environmental Limitations to Wool Growth (Eds Black, J. L. & Reis, P. J.), pp. 79–98. Armidale: University of New England Publishing Unit.Google Scholar
Cowan, R. T., Robinson, J. J., McDonald, I. & Smart, R. (1980). Effects of body fatness at lambing and diet in lactation on body tissue loss, feed intake and milk yield of ewes in early lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 497–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earle, D. F. & McGowan, A. A. (1979). Evaluation and calibration of an automated rising plate meter for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 337–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, J. Z., Maxwell, T. J. & Heazelwood, P. G. (1987). Effects of pasture availability on herbage intake by autumn-lambing ewes. In Temperate Pastures: Their Production, Use and Management (Eds Wheeler, J. L., Pearson, C. J. & Robards, G. E.), pp. 335–337. Canberra: Australian Wool Corporation.Google Scholar
Geenty, K. G. & Rattray, P. V. (1987). The energy requirements of grazing sheep and cattle. In Livestock Feeding on Pasture (Ed. Nicol, A. M.), pp. 39–53. Occasional Publication No. 10. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Geenty, K. G. & Sykes, A. R. (1986). Effect of herbage allowance during pregnancy and lactation on feed intake, milk production, body composition and energy utilization of ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 106, 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1980). The effect of ewe body condition at lambing on the performance of ewes and their lambs at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 631–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibb, M. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1982). The effect of body condition and nutrition during late pregnancy on the performance of grazing ewes during lactation. Animal Production 34, 123–129.Google Scholar
Gibb, M. J., Treacher, T. T. & Shanmugalingam, V. S. (1981). Herbage intake and performance of grazing ewes and of their lambs when weaned at 6, 8, 10 or 14 weeks of age. Animal Production 33, 223–232.Google Scholar
Gill, J. L. & Hafs, H. D. (1971). Analysis of repeated measurements of animals. Journal of Animal Science 33, 331–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawker, H., Crosbie, S. F. & Thompson, K. F. (1982). Effects of season and pasture allowance on the wool growth of Romney ewes. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42, 183–185.Google Scholar
Hawkins, B. W., Morris, S. T., Gray, D. I. & Parker, W. J. (1989). Managing the transition to out-of-season lambing – a case farm example. Proceedings of the New Zealand Grassland Association 50, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1984). Sward conditions, herbage allowance and animal production: an evaluation of research results. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 44, 99–104.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1986). Grazing behaviour and herbage intake. In Grazing (Ed. Frame, J.), pp. 51–64. Occasional Symposium No. 19. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J., Mackie, C. K. & Parker, J. W. G. (1986). Sward surface heights for efficient grazing. Grass Farmer 24, 5–10.Google Scholar
Jefferies, B. C. (1961). Body condition scoring and its use in management. Tasmanian Journal of Agriculture 32, 19–21.Google Scholar
Korte, C. J. (1986). Tillering in ‘Grasslands Nui’ perennial ryegrass swards. 2. Seasonal pattern of tillering and age of flowering tillers with two mowing frequencies. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 29, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, T. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1987). Decision rules for grassland management. In Efficient Sheep Production from Grass (Ed. Pollott, G. E.), pp. 67–78. Occasional Publication No. 21. Hurley: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. J., Doney, J. M., Milne, J. A., Peart, J. N., Russel, A. J. F., Sibbald, A. R. & MacDonald, D. (1979). The effect of rearing type and prepartum nutrition on the intake and performance of lactating Greyface ewes at pasture. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 164–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCall, D. G. & Bywater, A. C. (1987). An analysis of options for year-round lamb production. Proceedings of the Asian–Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies Animal Science Congress 4, 459.Google Scholar
Morris, S. T., Blair, H. T., Parker, W. J. & McCutcheon, S. N.(1993). Evaluation of Border Leicester × Romney (BR), Poll Dorset × BR, and Suffolk × BR ewes for out-of-season lambing. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 36, 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, R. J., Parsons, A. J., Penning, P. D. & Treacher, T. T. (1990). Sward composition, animal performance and the potential production of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked with sheep. Grass and Forage Science 45, 325–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Sullivan, M., O'Keeffe, W. F. & Flynn, M. J. (1987). The value of pasture height in the measurement of dry matter yield. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 26, 63–68.Google Scholar
Parker, W. J. (1990). Application of intraruminal chromium controlled release capsules to the measurement of herbage intake of sheep at pasture. PhD thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, North Zealand.Google Scholar
Parker, W. J. & McCutcheon, S. N. (1992). Effect of sward height on herbage intake and production of ewes of different rearing rank during lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 118, 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J., McCutcheon, S. N. & Carr, D. H. (1989). Effect of herbage type and level of intake on the release of chromic oxide from intraruminal controlled release capsules in sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 537–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, W. J., Morris, S. T. & McCutcheon, S. N. (1991). Wool production and feed intake in unmated and mated Border Leicester × Romney crossbred ewes shorn in July or November. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 34, 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, A. J. (1984). Guidelines for management of continuously grazed swards. Grass Farmer 17, 5–9.Google Scholar
Penning, P. D. (1986). Some effects of sward conditions on grazing behaviour and intake by sheep. In Grazing Research at Northern Latitudes (Ed. Gudmundsson, O.), pp. 219–226. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D. & Hooper, G. E. (1985). An evaluation of the use of short-term weight changes in grazing sheep for estimating herbage intake. Grass and Forage Science 40, 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penning, P. D., Parsons, A. J., Orr, R. J. & Treacher, T. T. (1991). Intake and behaviour responses by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under continuous stocking. Grass and Forage Science 46, 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purchas, R. W. & Beach, A. D. (1981). Between-operator repeatability of fat depth measurements made on live sheep and lambs with an ultrasonic probe. New Zealand Journal of Experimental Agriculture 9, 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Jagusch, K. T., Duganzich, D. M., MacLean, K. S. & Lynch, R. J. (1982). Influence of feeding post-lambing on ewe and lamb performance at grazing. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production 42, 179–182.Google Scholar
Rattray, P. V., Thompson, K. F., Hawker, H. & Sumner, R. M. W. (1987). Pastures for sheep production. In Livestock Feeding on Pasture (Ed. Nicol, A. M.), pp. 89–103. Occasional Publication No. 10. Hamilton: New Zealand Society of Animal Production.Google Scholar
Ross, D. A. (1958). Rapid measurement of the fibre diameter of Romney crossbred wool by the airflow apparatus. New Zealand Journal of Science 1, 127–142.Google Scholar
Roughan, P. G. & Holland, R. (1977). Predicting in-vivo digestibilities of herbages by exhaustive enzymic hydrolysis of cell walls. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 28, 1057–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slen, S. B., Clark, R. D. & Hironaka, R. (1963). A comparison of milk production and its relation to lamb growth in five breeds of sheep. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 43, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snedecor, G. W. & Cochran, W. G. (1967). Statistical Methods. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
Statistical Analysis System (1985). SAS Users' Guide, version 5 edition. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.Google Scholar
Treacher, T. T. (1983). Nutrient requirements for lactation in the ewe. In Sheep Production (Ed. Haresign, W.), pp. 133–153. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., Hanrahan, J. P. & O'Riordan, E. G. (1990). Variation of intake at pasture: differences among breeds of sheep of different mature size. Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production 4, 57–60.Google Scholar
Vulich, S. A., O'Riordan, E. G. & Hanrahan, J. P. (1991). Effect of litter size on herbage intake at pasture by ewes and their progeny. Animal Production 53, 191–197.Google Scholar
White, D. H., Bowman, P. J., Morley, F. H. W., McManus, W. R. & Filan, S. J. (1983). A simulation model of a breeding ewe flock. Agricultural Systems 10, 149–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar