Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T21:52:24.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of supplementation with protein, energy and L-methionine, on the digestion of silage by sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

Margaret Gill  and
M. J. Ulyatt
Margaret Gill
Affiliation:
Sheep Husbandry Department, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand
M. J. Ulyatt
Affiliation:
Applied Biochemistry Division, DSIR, Palmerston North, New Zealand
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Mature Romney wethers with rumen cannulae and re-entrant cannulae in the proximal duodenum were fed a basal diet of silage with supplements of formaldehydetreated casein (protein) and starch/sucrose (energy). In addition methionine availability was increased by infusion of L-methionine into the duodenum.

Maximum intake was limited to near-maintenance with the aim of comparing treatment effects at the same level of intake. In practice, intake of the control silage alone decreased markedly after 10 days of feeding. This decline was significantly (P &0·01) reduced on the protein and energy supplemented diets, and intake increased again during the period of methionine infusion.

Protein and energy supplementation increased the flow of total N (P < 0·01) into the duodenum on the control silage and the flow of amino acids into the duodenum was increased from 50 g/day on the basal diet, to 77 g/day on the energy-supplemented diet, and 111 g/day on the protein-supplemented diet.

The percentage of amino acid N in the total N entering the duodenum was also increased by supplementation: from 72% on the control to 81% with energy supplement and 94% with protein supplement.

Comparisons of the amino acid composition of duodenal digesta indicated that a substantial part of the increased duodenal protein flow on protein-supplemented silage was due to the formaldehyde-casein being protected from degradation within the rumen.

The flow of amino acids into the duodenum was found to be closely related to amino acid intake, such that 67% of the variation in duodenal amino acid flow was associated with variation in intake.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , August 1977 , pp. 43 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, R. W. (1964). Pasture Quality and Ruminant Nutrition, I. Carbohydrate composition of ryegrass varieties grown as sheep pastures. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 7, 496–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1974). Modified method for the determination of dry matter in ensiled herbage using distillation with toluene. Laboratory Practice 23, 260–2.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1976). Effects of intraperitoneal injections of DL-methionine on the voluntary intake and wool growth of sheep fed sole diets of hay, silage and pasture differing in digestibility. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 141–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, T. N., Fennessy, P. F. & Duncan, S. J. (1973). Effect of formaldehyde treatment on the chemical composition and nutritive value of silage. III. Voluntary intake, live-weight gain and wool growth in sheep fed silages with and without intraperitoneal supplementation with DL-methionine. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 16, 64–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergen, W. G., Purser, D. B. & Cline, J. H. (1968). Effect of ration on the nutritive quality of rumen microbial protein. Journal of Animal Science 27, 1497–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Binnerts, W. T., Klooster, A. Th. Van't & Frens, A. M. (1968). Soluble chromium indicator measured by atomic absorption in digestion experiments Veterinary Record 82, 470.Google Scholar
Bishop, A. H. & Kentish, T. D. (1970). A comparison of pasture conserved as hay or as silage for feeding sheep. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 10, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, G. F., Armstrong, D. G. & MacRae, J. C. (1968). The establishment in one operation of a cannula into the rumen and re-entrant cannulae into the duodenum and ileum of the sheep. British Veterinary Journal 124, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demarquilly, C. & Jarrige, R. (1970). The effect of method of forage conservation on digestibility and voluntary intake. Proceedings of XIth International Grassland Congress, Surfers' Paradise, pp. 733–7.Google Scholar
Drennan, M. (1973). Supplementation of silage with protein for beef cattle. Irish Grassland and Animal Production Association Journal 8, 32–41.Google Scholar
Forbes, T. J. & Irwin, J. M. D. (1970). Silage for winter fattening. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 96–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M., Ulyatt, M. J. & Barry, T. N. (1977). The effect of formalin-treatment on the digestion of silage by sheep. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. (In the press.)Google Scholar
Gill, M. (1976). A study of the amino acid status of sheep fed silage, with particular reference to methionine. Ph.D. Thesis, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Griffiths, T. W., Spillane, T. A. & Bath, I. M. (1973). Studies on the nutritive value of silage with particular reference to the effects of energy and N supplementation in growing heifers. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderickx, M. & Martin, J. (1963). In In vitro Study of the N Metabolism in the Rumen. Ghent: State Agricultural College.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. & Whittenbury, R. (1973). The Ensilage Process. In Chemistry and Biochemistry of Herbage, vol. 3 (ed. Butler, G. W. and Bailey, R. W.). New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C, Ulyatt, M. J., Pearce, P. D. & Hendtlass, J. (1972). Quantitative intestinal digestion of nitrogen in sheep given formaldehydetreated and untreated casein supplements. British Journal of Nutrition 27, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murdoch, J. C. (1964). Some factors affecting the in-take of roughage by sheep. Journal of the British Grassland Society 19, 316–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryder, M. L. & Stephenson, S. K. (1968). In Wool Growth. New York and London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J. (1968). The digestibility and utilisation of fresh grass, hay and silage by sheep. Animal Production 10, 240 (Abstr).Google Scholar
Wellman, U. (1966). A comparison of the D.M. intake of silage and hay by cattle. Proceedings of the Xth International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 568–9.Google Scholar