Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T02:10:28.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of rate of application of nitrogen fertilizer on soil copper uptake by barley under unirrigated conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. C. Tiwari
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India
J. Adinarayana
Affiliation:
Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi-221005, India

Summary

Field experiments were conducted on four barley cultivars (two hulled and two hullless) grown under unirrigated conditions in Varanasi, India, to observe the effect of rate of application of nitrogen on copper concentration and uptake in plants and soils. The copper concentration in both plants and soil decreased with age of crop because of the dilution effect of more vegetative growth. Varieties did not differ in copper concentration of plants but increasing application of nitrogen decreased copper concentration in the plants. Since the hulled varieties yielded more than the hull-less ones, they removed more copper from the soil. Similarly yield was increased linearly by the application of N fertilizer and this led to a linear increase in depletion of available copper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brown, J. C. & Harmer, P. M. (1950). The influence of copper compounds on the yield, growth pattern and composition of spring wheat and corn grown on organic soil. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 15, 284291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czarnowska, K. (1975). Effect of N-fertilization on trace elements and N contents of winter wheat at different growth stages. Roczniki Nauk Rolniczych 101 (2), 6377.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. A. & Delaney, J. (1961). Copper and nitrogen in the nutrition of wheat on Cutaway peat. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 1, 81.Google Scholar
Henkens, C. H. (1957). Copper in arable land. Land-bouwvoorlichting 14 (11), 581589.Google Scholar
Jackson, M. L. (1967). Soil Chemical Analysis. New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.Google Scholar
Jurkowska, H. & Rogoz, A. (1981). The effect of form and rate of fertilizer-N on the content of macro and trace elements in plants. II. Trace elements. Acta Agraria et Silvestria, Agraria 20, 121131.Google Scholar
Kanwar, J. S. (1976). Soil Fertility – Theory and Practice. 1st edn.New Delhi: Indian Council of Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. & Norvell, W. A. (1978). Development of DTPA soil test for Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu. Soil Science Society of America Journal 42, 421428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackiak, F., Maksimou, A. & Liwski, S. (1968). Chemical investigations of peat soils in Poland. Second International Peat Congress 2, pp. 919924. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1971). Trace elements in soils and crops. Technical Bulletin No. 21, pp. 68, 78 and 94. London: H.M.S.O.Google Scholar
Mishra, S. G. & Trwari, R. C. (1964). Effects of fertilizers and pH on retention of copper by soils. Journal of Indian Society of Soil Science 12, 269.Google Scholar
Mortvedt, J. J., Giordano, P. M. & Lindsay, W. L. (1972). Micronutrients in Agriculture. Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.: Soil Science Society of America.Google Scholar
Rebowska, Z. (1978). The effect of different rates of NPK on the uptake and contents of nutrients and trace elements in barley plants grown in sand culture. Pamietnik Pulawski 70, 113128.Google Scholar
Takkar, P. N. (1982). Micronutrients – forms, contents, distribution in profile, indices of availability and soil test methods. 12th International Congress of Soil Science, New Delhi. Review of Research I, pp. 361391.Google Scholar