Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T19:11:10.527Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of protein level and grain source on milk production, nutrient digestibility and ruminal fermentation in primiparous Holstein cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2021

H. Mirzaei-Alamouti*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan45371-38791, Iran
A. Mohammad
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, University of Zanjan, Zanjan45371-38791, Iran
M. Vazirigohar
Affiliation:
Zist Dam Group, University Incubator Center, University of Zanjan, Zanjan45371-38791, Iran
P. Rezamand
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Veterinary Science, University of Idaho, Moscow83844-2330, USA
M. Mansouryar*
Affiliation:
Zist Dam Group, University Incubator Center, University of Zanjan, Zanjan45371-38791, Iran
*
Authors for correspondence: H. Mirzaei-Alamouti, E-mail: [email protected]; M. Mansouryar, E-mail: [email protected]
Authors for correspondence: H. Mirzaei-Alamouti, E-mail: [email protected]; M. Mansouryar, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This study investigated whether the interaction of protein level and grain type can affect milk production, nutrient digestibility and rumen fermentation in primiparous Holstein cows. Four dietary treatments were used: high-protein with barley as the only grain source, HP-B; (2) high-protein with an equal mix of barley and maize, HP-BM; (3) low-protein with barley as the only grain source, LP-B and (4) low-protein with equal proportions of barley and maize, LP-BM. High-protein diets showed no improvement in milk or protein yield compared with low-protein, but barley and maize mix diets increased energy-corrected milk yield and fat yield compared with barley-only diets. The highest total apparent digestibility of dry matter, organic matter and neutral detergent fibre was observed for LP-BM whereas HP-BM showed the greatest crude protein digestibility. Treatment had no effect on total volatile fatty acid concentrations, molar proportion of acetate and propionate and acetate to propionate ratio. The lowest ruminal pH was observed for LP-B. High-protein diets resulted in greater concentrations of ammonia nitrogen (N), urinary N, blood and milk urea nitrogen compared with low-protein diets, whereas low-protein diets showed better nitrogen utilization efficiency. This study showed that primiparous lactating cows do not benefit from high-protein diets with different fermentation rates of grain sources, but barley and maize diets may improve milk production performance, ruminal fermentation and pH under the present dietary conditions. The current results on milk production performance should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of cows used (eight in each treatment).

Type
Animal Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beauchemin, KA and Rode, LM (1997) Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fibre in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or maize. Journal of Dairy Science 80, 16291639.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(97)76094-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Borucki Castro, S, Phillip, L, Lapierre, H, Jardon, P and Berthiaume, R (2008) The relative merit of ruminal undegradable protein from soybean meal or soluble fibre from beet pulp to improve nitrogen utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 39473957.10.3168/jds.2007-0638CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bramley, E, Lean, IJ, Fulkerson, WJ, Stevenson, MA, Rabiee, AR and Costa, ND (2008) The definition of acidosis in dairy herds predominantly fed on pasture and concentrates. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 308321.10.3168/jds.2006-601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broderick, GA (2003) Effects of varying dietary protein and energy levels on the production of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 13701381.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73721-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cabrita, AR, Dewhurst, RJ, Abreu, JM and Fonseca, AJ (2006) Evaluation of the effects of synchronising the availability of N and energy on rumen function and production responses of dairy cows – a review. Animal Research 55, 124.10.1051/animres:2005045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerrato-Sánchez, M, Calsamiglia, S and Ferret, A (2007) Effects of time at suboptimal pH on rumen fermentation in a dual-flow continuous culture system. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 14861492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, DG and Choung, JJ (1995) The importance of rate of ruminal fermentation of energy sources in diets for dairy cows. In Garnsworthy, PC and Cole, DJA (eds), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham, England: Nottingham University Press, pp. 127.Google Scholar
Cunningham, KD, Cecava, M, Johnson, T and Ludden, P (1996) Influence of source and amount of dietary protein on milk yield by cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 79, 620630.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76407-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cyriac, J, Rius, AG, McGilliard, ML, Pearson, RE, Bequette, BJ and Hanigan, MD (2008) Lactation performance of mid-lactation dairy cows fed ruminally degradable protein at concentrations lower than National Research Council recommendations. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 47044713.10.3168/jds.2008-1112CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Firkins, JL (1996) Maximizing microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. The Journal of Nutrition 126, 13471354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gozho, GN and Mutsvangwa, T (2008) Influence of carbohydrate source on ruminal fermentation characteristics, performance, and microbial protein synthesis in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 27262735.10.3168/jds.2007-0809CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huhtanen, P and Hristov, AN (2009) A meta-analysis of the effects of dietary protein concentration and degradability on milk protein yield and milk N efficiency in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 32223232.10.3168/jds.2008-1352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hynes, DN, Stergiadis, S, Gordon, A and Yan, T (2016) Effects of crude protein level in concentrate supplements on animal performance and nitrogen utilization of lactating dairy cows fed fresh-cut perennial grass. Journal of Dairy Science 99, 81118120.10.3168/jds.2016-11110CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaswari, T, Lebzien, P, Flachowsky, G and terMeulen, U (2007) Studies on the relationship between the synchronization index and the microbial protein synthesis in the rumen of dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology 139, 122.10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katongole, CB and Yan, T (2020) Effect of varying dietary crude protein level on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, milk production, and nitrogen use efficiency by lactating Holstein–Friesian cows. Animals 10, 114.10.3390/ani10122439CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolver, E, Muller, LD, Varga, GA and Cassidy, TJ (1998) Synchronization of ruminal degradation of supplemental carbohydrate with pasture nitrogen in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 20172028.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75776-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, RA, Young, FJ, Patterson, DC, Kilpatrick, DJ, Wylie, ARG and Mayne, CS (2009) Effect of dietary protein content on animal production and blood metabolites of dairy cows during lactation. Journal of Dairy Science 92, 10011012.10.3168/jds.2008-1155CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, C, Hristov, AN, Cassidy, TW, Heyler, KS, Lapierre, H, Varga, GA, de Veth, MJ, Patton, RA and Parys, C (2012a) Rumen protected lysine, methionine, and histidine increase milk protein yield in dairy cows fed metabolizable protein-deficient diet. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 60426060.10.3168/jds.2012-5581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C, Hristov, AN, Dell, CJ, Feyereisen, GW, Kaye, J and Beegle, D (2012b) Effect of dietary protein concentration on ammonia and greenhouse gas emitting potential of dairy manure. Journal of Dairy Science 95, 19301941.10.3168/jds.2010-4141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mäntysaari, P, Huhtanen, P, Nousiainen, J and Virkki, M (2004) The effect of concentrate crude protein content and feeding strategy of total mixed ration on performance of primiparous dairy cows. Livestock Production Science 85, 223233.10.1016/S0301-6226(03)00131-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moran, JB (1986) Cereal grains in complete diets for dairy cows: a comparison of rolled barley, wheat and oats and of three methods of processing oats. Animal Science 43, 2736.10.1017/S0003356100018316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mould, FL, Ørskov, ER and Mann, SO (1983) Associative effects of mixed feeds. I. Effects of type and level of supplementation and the influence of the rumen fluid pH on cellulolysis in vivo and dry matter digestion of various roughages. Animal Feed Science and Technology 10, 1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (2001) Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle, 7th rev. Edn. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Obara, Y, Dellow, DW and Nolan, JV (1991) The influence of energy rich supplements on nitrogen kinetics in ruminants. In Tsuda, T, Sasaki, Y and Kawashima, R (eds). Physiological Aspects of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 515539.10.1016/B978-0-12-702290-1.50029-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Østergaard, S, Sorensen, JT and Houe, H (2003) A stochastic model simulating milk fever in a dairy herd. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 58, 125143.10.1016/S0167-5877(03)00049-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynal, SM and Broderick, GA (2003) Effects of feeding dairy cows protein supplements of varying ruminal degradability. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 835843.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73666-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, JB and Wilson, DB (1996) Why are ruminal cellulolytic bacteria unable to digest cellulose at low pH? Journal of Dairy Science 79, 15031509.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(96)76510-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, JK, Yang, JY, Kim, HJ, Upadhaya, SD, Cho, WM and Ha, JK (2010) Effects of synchronization of carbohydrate and protein supply on ruminal fermentation, nitrogen metabolism and microbial protein synthesis in Holstein steers. Asian-Australians Journal of Animal Science 23, 14551461.10.5713/ajas.2010.10247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabi, Z, Arieli, A, Bruckental, I, Aharoni, Y, Zamwel, S, Bor, A and Tagari, H (1998) Effect of the synchronization of the degradation of dietary crude protein and organic matter and feeding frequency on ruminal fermentation and flow of digesta in the abomasum of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 81, 19912000.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75773-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Socha, MT, Schwab, CG, Putnam, DE, Whitehouse, NL, Garthwaite, BD and Ducharme, GA (2008) Extent of methionine limitation in peak-, early-, and mid-lactation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 91, 19962010.10.3168/jds.2007-0739CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strobel, HJ and Russell, JB (1986) Effect of pH and energy spilling on bacterial protein synthesis by carbohydrate-limited cultures of mixed rumen bacteria. Journal of Dairy Science 69, 29412947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Theurer, CB, Huber, JT, Delgado-Elorduy, A and Wanderley, R (1999) Invited review: summary of steam-flaking maize or sorghum grain for lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 19501959.10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75431-7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Keulen, J and Young, BA (1977) Evaluation of acid insoluble ash as a neutral marker in ruminant digestibility studies. Journal of Animal Science 44, 282287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, PJ, Robertson, JB and Lewis, BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 35833597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C, Liu, JX, Yuan, ZP, Wu, YM, Zhai, SW and Ye, HW (2007) Effect of level of metabolizable protein on milk production and nitrogen utilization in lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 29602965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, WZ, Beauchemin, KA and Rode, LM (2001) Effects of grain processing, forage to concentrate ratio, and forage particle size on rumen pH and digestion by dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 22032216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed