Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:18:09.888Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of N, P and K fertilizers on the availability of native and applied manganese to wheat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

B. Mishra  and
B. R. Tripathi
B. Mishra
Affiliation:
Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri, Agra (India)
B. R. Tripathi
Affiliation:
Raja Balwant Singh College, Bichpuri, Agra (India)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The influence of three rates of each of N, P and K fertilizers on the availability of native and applied Mn to wheat was studied in a field experiment on an alluvial soil of the Indo-Gangetic plain. Increasing dressings of N as ammonium sulphate resulted in consistently higher yields and Mn uptake by the crop. Concentration of Mn in the grain increased with increasing N dressings when native Mn and Mn fertilizer supplied this nutrient but it was unaffected inplants sprayed with Mn. Adding P as superphosphate tended to lower the concentration of Mn in the grain when relying on native or applied Mn but it significantly enhanced the crop yield and total Mn uptake. Applying K as muriate of potash slightly depressed Mn uptake by plants. Potassium had a more pronounced effect in the absence of P fertilizer. The concentration of Mn in thestraw was not significantly affected by N, P and K fertilization.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , December 1973 , pp. 369 - 373
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bingham, F. T. (1963). Relation between phosphorus and micro-nutrients in plant. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 27, 389–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bukovac, M. J. & Wittwer, S. H. (1957). Absorption and mobility of foliar applied nutrients. Pl. Physiol., Lancaster 32, 428–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cheng, B. T. & Ouellete, G. J. (1970). Effect of various nitrogen fertilizers on manganese and iron availability as measured by incubation and sand culture studies. Can. J. Soil Sci. 50, 163–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, C. M. & Ulrich, A. (1959). Analytical methods for use in plant analysis. Bull. Calif. Agric. Exp. Stn, no. 766.Google Scholar
Larsen, S. (1964). The effect of phosphate application on manganese content of plants grown on neutral and alkaline soils. Pl. Soil 21, 37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leeper, C. W. (1947). Forms and reactions of manganese in soil. Soil Sci. 63, 79–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindsay, W. L. & Stephenson, H. F. (1959). Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 23, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, J. P., Ervin, J. U. & Shephard, R. A. (1961). Influence of exchangeable Na and K at different base saturation levels on growth and composition, of citrus plants. Soil Sci. 91, 273–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulder, E. G. & Gerretsen, F. C. (1952). Soil manganese in relation to plant growth. Adv. Agron. 4, 221–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sherman, G. D. & Harmer, P. M. (1942). The manganous–manganic equilibrium of soils. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 7, 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snider, H. J. (1943). Manganese in some Illinois soils and crops. Soil Sci. 56, 187–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venkateswarltt, J. (1964). Effect of nitrogen and sulphur additions on the availability of manganese for rice. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 12, 393–98.Google Scholar