Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:19:15.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of leys on soil fertility: I. The effect of management of clover aftermath on the yield of the succeeding wheat crop

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

F. Hanley ,
W. J. Ridgman  and
M. G. Barker
F. Hanley
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
W. J. Ridgman
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
M. G. Barker
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A series of experiments designed to compare the effects on the succeeding wheat crop of five different methods of treating the aftermath of a Broad Red Clover ley is described and the results discussed.

2. There was little consistent difference in the effects of using the second crop for hay, for grazing or for green manure by ploughing it in. Bastard fallowing immediately after the first hay crop and taking the second crop for seed both showed large seasonal fluctuations in their effects, but there was insufficient evidence to show if these were due to seed-bed differences.

3. In no season was taking the second crop for hay outyielded by any other treatment.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 49 , Issue 2 , August 1957 , pp. 251 - 257
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Crowther, E. M. & Mann, H. H. (1933). J. R. Agric. Soc., 94, 128.Google Scholar
Hall, A. D. (1919). The book of the Rothamsted Experiments, p. 200. London.Google Scholar
Halliday, D. J. (1948). Bull. Jealott's Hill Res. Sta. no. 6.Google Scholar
Hudson, H. G. (1939). J. Agric. Sci. 29, 76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothamsted Experimental Station (1932). Report, p. 33.Google Scholar