Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:48:50.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The effect of heat stress on quinoa (cv. Titicaca) under controlled climatic conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2020

Jorge Alvar-Beltrán*
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)-University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
Leonardo Verdi
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)-University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
Anna Dalla Marta
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)-University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
Abdalla Dao
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Bobo Dioulasso BP910, Burkina Faso
Roberto Vivoli
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)-University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
Jacob Sanou
Affiliation:
Institut de l'Environnement et Recherches Agricoles (INERA), Bobo Dioulasso BP910, Burkina Faso
Simone Orlandini
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture, Food, Environment and Forestry (DAGRI)-University of Florence, 50144 Florence, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Jorge Alvar-Beltrán, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is capable of adapting to multiple environments and tolerating abiotic stresses including saline, drought and frost stress conditions. However, the introduction of quinoa into new environments has disclosed adaptation challenges. The principle factor affecting crop pollination is heat stress at flowering, which leads to sterile plants. To investigate the effect of high temperatures during the sensitive phenological phases, flowering and seed germination, a Danish-bred cultivar (cv. Titicaca) was grown in climatic chambers. Selection of the cv. Titicaca was based on the fact that it is the most extensively used cultivar in the Sahel and Middle East and North African region. The results of this research demonstrated that temperatures exceeding 38 °C hindered seed germination and pollination, and therefore, seed yield at harvest. At 38 °C, seed yield losses were 30%, whilst seed germination percentage declined below 50%. In addition, the results of the present research were compared with field observations from Burkina Faso in order to determine the spatiotemporal suitability of this crop with respect to temperature stress. Although many other abiotic stresses need to be considered when defining crop calendars (e.g. heavy precipitation in July and August), this research proposes the following growing periods to avoid heat-stress conditions at flowering: Sahel (July–September and November–February), Soudano–Sahel (June–February) and Soudanian zone (all year round).

Type
Climate Change and Agriculture Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adolf, VI, Jacobsen, SE and Shabala, S (2013) Salt tolerance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 92, 4354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, RG, Pereira, LS, Raes, D and Smith, M (1998) Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. In Julian, (ed). Crop Evapotranspiration, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, vol. 300. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Alvar-Beltrán, J, Saturnin, C, Dao, A, Dalla Marta, A, Sanou, J and Orlandini, S (2019a) Effect of drought and nitrogen fertilisation on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions in Burkina Faso. Italian Journal of Agrometeorology 1, 3344.Google Scholar
Alvar-Beltrán, J, Dao, A, Saturnin, C, Dalla Marta, A, Sanou, J and Orlandini, S (2019b) Effect of drought, nitrogen fertilization, temperature, and photoperiodicity on Quinoa plant growth and development in the Sahel. Agronomy Journal 9(10), 607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bazile, D, Pulvento, C, Verniau, A, Al-Nusairi, MS, Ba, D, Breidy, J and Sepahvand, NA (2016) Worldwide evaluations of quinoa: preliminary results from post international year of quinoa FAO projects in nine countries. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 850.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bazile, B, Jacobsen, S-E and Verniau, A (2017) The global expansion of Quinoa: trends and limits. In De Ron, AM, Sparvoli, F, Pueyo, JJ and Bazile, D (eds). The Challenge of Protein Crops as a Sustainable Source of Food and Feed for the Future. Frontiers in Plant Science, Frontiers Research Topics, pp. 176181.Google Scholar
Bertero, HD (2001) Effects of photoperiod, temperature and radiation on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions. Annals of Botany 87, 495502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertero, HD, King, RW and Hall, AJ (1999) Photoperiod-sensitive development phases in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Field Crops Research 60, 231243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betteridge, DJ (2000) What is oxidative stress? Metabolism 49, 38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhargava, A (2015) Quinoa in the Indian subcontinent. In Didier, B, Daniel, BH and Carlos, N (eds). State of the Art Report on Quinoa Around the World in 2013. Santiago du Chili: FAO, CIRAD, pp. 511523. Chapter 6.2.Google Scholar
Boero, C, González, J and Prado, F (2000) Efecto de la temperatura sobre la germinación de diferentes variedades de quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Lilloa 40, 103108.Google Scholar
Bois, JF, Winkel, T, Lhomme, JP, Raffaillac, JP and Rocheteau, A (2006) Response of some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature: effects on germination, phenology, growth and freezing. European Journal of Agronomy 25, 299308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breidy, J (2015) Final Report on quinoa Evaluation Trials in Lebanon. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Ceccato, DV, Bertero, HD and Batlla, D (2011) Environmental control of dormancy in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seeds: two potential genetic resources for pre-harvest sprouting tolerance. Seed Science Research 21, 133141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccato, D, Delatorre-Herrera, J, Burrieza, H, Bertero, HD, Martinez, EA, Delfino, I, Moncada, S, Bazile, D and Castellión, M (2015) Seed physiology and response to germination conditions. In Didier, B, Daniel, BH and Carlos, N (eds). State of the art Report on Quinoa Around the World in 2013. Santiago du Chili: FAO, CIRAD, p. 131142. Chapter 2.2.Google Scholar
Challinor, A, Wheeler, T, Garforth, C, Craufurd, P and Kassam, A (2007) Assessing the vulnerability of food crop systems in Africa to climate change. Climatic Change 83, 381399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choukr-Allah, R, Rao, NK, Hirich, A, Shahid, M, Alshankiti, A, Toderich, K and Butt, KUR (2016) Quinoa for marginal environments: toward future food and nutritional security in MENA and Central Asia regions. Frontiers in Plant Science 7, 346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coulibaly, Ak and Martinez, EA (2015) Assessment and adaptation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to the agro-climatic conditions in Mali, West Africa: an example of south-north-south-cooperation. In Didier, B, Daniel, BH and Carlos, N (eds). State of the Art Report on Quinoa Around the World in 2013. Santiago du Chili: FAO, CIRAD, pp. 524533. Chapter 6.3.1.Google Scholar
Dao, A, Sanou, J, Yaméogo, C, Kando, C, Bakoané, A, Traoré, S, Dagnoko, M and Bazile, D (2016) Quinoa introduction in West Africa: experience of Burkina Faso. International Quinoa Conference 2016: Quinoa for Future Food and Nutrition Security in Marginal Environments, Dubai, 6–8 December 2016 [Accessed on 8 October 2019]. Available at http://www.quinoaconference.com.Google Scholar
Djamal, S (2020) In Technical assistance for the introduction of quinoa and appropriation / institutionalization of its production in Algeria-Second Evaluation Report. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Dorne, A (1981) Variation in seed germination inhibition of Chenopodium bonus-henricus in relation to altitude of plant growth. Canadian Journal of Botany 59, 18931901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupuis, I and Dumas, C (1990) Influence of temperature stress on in vitro fertilization and heat shock protein synthesis in maize (Zea mays L.) reproductive tissues. Plant Physiology 94, 665670.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gacemi, A (2016) Introduction and assessment of Quinoa in Algeria: field trial evaluation of eleven Chenopodium quinoa genotypes grown under Mediterranean conditions. In International Quinoa Conference 2016: Quinoa for Future Food and Nutrition Security in Marginal Environments, Dubai, 6–8 December 2016 [Accessed on 8 October 2019]. Available at http://www.quinoaconference.com.Google Scholar
Garcia, M, Raes, D and Jacobsen, SE (2003) Evapotranspiration analysis and irrigation requirements of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) in the Bolivian highlands. Agricultural Water Management 60, 119134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia, M, Condori, B and Castillo, CD (2015) Agroecological and agronomic cultural practices of quinoa in South America. In Matanguihan, J and Murphy, KS (eds). Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production. New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 2546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habsatou, B (2016) Adaptability of quinoa to adverse climatic and soil conditions of Niger. International Quinoa Conference 2016: Quinoa for Future Food and Nutrition Security in Marginal Environments, Dubai, 6–8 December 2016 [Accessed on 8 October 2019]. Available at http://www.quinoaconference.com.Google Scholar
Hargreaves, GH and Samani, ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 1, 9699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassan, L (2015) Iraq Final Evaluation Report on quinoa. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Hatfield, JL and Prueger, JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes 10, 410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinojosa, L, Matanguihan, JB and Murphy, KM (2019) Effect of high temperature on pollen morphology, plant growth and seed yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 205, 3345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirich, A, Choukr-Allah, R, Jacobsen, SE and Benlhabib, O (2012) Could quinoa be an alternative crop of wheat in the Mediterranean region: case of Morocco? Les notes d'alerte du CIHEAM 86, 4.Google Scholar
Hirich, A, Choukr-Allah, R and Jacobsen, SE (2014a) Deficit irrigation and organic compost improve growth and yield of quinoa and pea. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 200, 390398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirich, A, Choukr-Allah, R and Jacobsen, SE (2014b) Quinoa in Morocco–effect of sowing dates on development and yield. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 200, 371377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, SE (2017) The scope for adaptation of quinoa in northern latitudes of Europe. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 203, 603613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, SE and Bach, AP (1998) The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in quinoa quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Seed Science and Technology 26, 515523.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, SE, Mujica, A and Jensen, CR (2003) The resistance of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International 19, 99109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, SE, Monteros, C, Christiansen, JL, Bravo, LA, Corcuera, LJ and Mujica, A (2005) Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages. European Journal of Agronomy 22, 131139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, SE, Monteros, C, Corcuera, LJ, Bravo, LA, Christiansen, JL and Mujica, A (2007) Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). European Journal of Agronomy 26, 471475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, DE, Ho, YS, Lightfoot, DJ, Schmöckel, SM, Li, B, Borm, TJ and Kharbatia, NM (2017) The genome of Chenopodium quinoa. Nature 542, 307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, PG and Thornton, PK (2003) The potential impacts of climate change on maize production in Africa and Latin America in 2055. Global Environmental Change 13, 5159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesjak, J and Calderini, DF (2017) Increased night temperature negatively affects grain yield, biomass and grain number in Chilean quinoa. Frontiers in Plant Science 8, 352.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maarouf, M and Nagat, M (2016) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) performance under the hot-dry weather of Sudan. In International Quinoa Conference 2016: Quinoa for Future Food and Nutrition Security in Marginal Environments, Dubai.Google Scholar
Mamedi, A, Tavakkol Afshari, R and Oveisi, M (2017) Cardinal temperatures for seed germination of three Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science 48, 89100.Google Scholar
Mosseddaq, F, Bounsir, B, Khallouq, M and Benlhabib, O (2016) Optimization of quinoa nitrogen nutrition under Mediterranean climatic conditions. International Quinoa Conference 2016: Quinoa for Future Food and Nutrition Security in Marginal Environments, Dubai, 6–8 December 2016 [Accessed on 8 October /2019]. Available at http://www.quinoaconference.com.Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) (2018) National Centres for Environmental Information. [Accessed on 15 May 2018] Available at https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access.Google Scholar
Niang, I, Ruppel, OC, Abdrabo, MA, Essel, A, Lennard, C, Padgham, J and Urquhart, P (2014). Africa. In Barros, VR, Field, CB, Dokken, DJ, Mastrandrea, MD, Mach, KJ, Bilir, TE, Chatterjee, M, Ebi, KL, Estrada, YO, Genova, RC, Girma, B, Kissel, ES, Levy, AN, MacCracken, S, Mastrandrea, PR and White, LL (eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11991265.Google Scholar
Noulas, C (2015) Greece. In Didier, B, Daniel, BH, Carlos, N (eds). State of the Art Report on Quinoa Around the World in 2013. Santiago du Chili: FAO, CIRAD, pp. 492510. Chapter 6.1.6.Google Scholar
Paupière, M, van Heusden, A and Bovy, A (2014) The metabolic basis of pollen thermo-tolerance: perspectives for breeding. Metabolites 4, 889920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, AJ and Murphy, KM (2015) Quinoa cultivation for temperate North America: considerations and areas for investigation. In Matanguihan, J and Murphy, KS (eds). Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production. New Jersey, USA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 173192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prasad, PV and Djanaguiraman, M (2011) High night temperature decreases leaf photosynthesis and pollen function in grain sorghum. Functional Plant Biology 38, 9931003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pulvento, C, Riccardi, M, Lavini, A, d'Andria, R, Iafelice, G and Marconi, E (2010) Field trial evaluation of two Chenopodium quinoa genotypes grown under rain-fed conditions in a typical Mediterranean environment in South Italy. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 196, 407411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulvento, C, Riccardi, M, Lavini, A, Iafelice, G, Marconi, E and d'Andria, R (2012) Yield and quality characteristics of quinoa grown in open field under different saline and non-saline irrigation regimes. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 198, 254263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Razzaghi, F, Ahmadi, SH, Adolf, VI, Jensen, CR, Jacobsen, SE and Andersen, MN (2011) Water relations and transpiration of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under salinity and soil drying. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197, 348360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, M, Hilal, M, González, JA and Prado, FE (2004) Changes in soluble carbohydrates and related enzymes induced by low temperature during early developmental stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) seedlings. Journal of Plant Physiology 161, 683689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saeed, AL (2015) In Yemen Progress Report on quinoa. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
Salack, S (2006) Impacts des changements climatiques sur la production du mil et du sorgho dans les sites pilotes du plateau central, de Tahoua et de Fakara. Niamey, Niger: CILSS.Google Scholar
Sato, S, Peet, MM and Thomas, JF (2000) Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) under chronic, mild heat stress. Plant. Cell and Environment 23, 719726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shabala, L, Mackay, A, Tian, Y, Jacobsen, SE, Zhou, D and Shabala, S (2012) Oxidative stress protection and stomatal patterning as components of salinity tolerance mechanism in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa). Physiologia Plantarum 146, 2638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smirnoff, N (1998) Plant resistance to environmental stress. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 9, 214219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vacher, JJ (1998) Responses of two main Andean crops, quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and papa amarga (Solanum juzepczukii Buk.) to drought on the Bolivian Altiplano: significance of local adaptation. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 68, 99108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, WX, Vinocur, B, Shoseyov, O and Altman, A (2000) Biotechnology of plant osmotic stress tolerance physiological and molecular considerations. In IV International Symposium on In Vitro Culture and Horticultural Breeding 560, Finland, pp. 285292.Google Scholar
Yang, A, Akhtar, SS, Amjad, M, Iqbal, S and Jacobsen, SE (2016) Growth and physiological responses of quinoa to drought and temperature stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 202, 445453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar