Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-cx56b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T11:20:38.806Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of early-weaning rations upon the efficiency of growth and carcass production with some observations on the development of forestomachs in calves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. H. Ternouth  and
W. J. Pryor
J. H. Ternouth
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary School, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
W. J. Pryor
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Veterinary School, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The live-weight gain, efficiency of food conversion, energy and nitrogen accretion as edible carcass, and the forestomaeh development were measured in three groups of calves fed for 10 weeks (days 19–89 of life) either a diet of 4·5 1 of milk daily, or a concentrate meal containing 4% sodium propionate ad libitum, or a concentrate meal ad libitum. All groups had access to lucerne chaff and water ad libitum.

The mean live-weight gains of the three groups of calves were 47·5, 36·6 and 37·1 kg respectively even though their total energy and nitrogen intakes were not significantly different. The provision of dietary propionate did not improve the efficiency of food conversion or of energy or nitrogen accretion as the calves ate less of the meal containing propionate and more lucerne chaff. The differences in live-weight gain could be accounted for by the differences in carcass weight. Associated with the higher live-weight gain was a much higher efficiency of food utilization and of edible carcass energy and nitrogen accretion. The superior efficiency of the unweaned calves was concluded to be due to the liquid portion of the diet by-passing the rumeno-reticulum into the abomasum where the efficiency of utilization of highly digestible protein and carbohydrate is greater. The concentrate plus propionate fed calves ate less concentrate but more chaff and had a lower efficiency of food utilization and edible carcass energy accretion than the other weaned group of calves.

The weight of rumeno-reticular tissues was greater in the weaned than in the unweaned calves, although the meal plus propionate group ate similar quantities of chaff to the unweaned group. In all groups, the degree of papillary development was related to the intake of concentrates plus roughage. The most appropriate manner to describe ruminal tissue weight is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 1970 , pp. 559 - 565
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Association of Agricultural Chemists (1965). Official Methods of Analysis. 10th edition. Washington, D.C.: A.O.A.C.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1962). The Energy Metabolism of Ruminants, pp. 236–79. London: Hutohinson.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M. (1963). Estimation of carcase composition: the anatomical approach. Symposium on Carcase Composition and Appraisal of Meat Animals Ed. Tribe, D. E.. Melbourne: Commonw. Scient. ind. Bos. Org.Google Scholar
Butterfield, R. M., Pryor, W. J. & Berg, R. T. (1966). A study of carcase growth in calves. Res. vet. Sci. 7, 417–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, J. R. & Watkin, B. R. (1967). Studies in the evaluation of pasture quality with young grazing sheep. Observations on wool production, carcass appraisal and reticulo-ruminal characteristics. J. agric. Sci., Gamb. 68, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gllliland, R. L., Bush, L. J. & Friend, J. D. (1962). Relation of ration composition to rumen development in early-weaned dairy calves with observations on ruminal parakeratosis. J. Dairy Sci. 45, 1211–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimes, R. C, Watkin, B. R. & Gallagher, J. R. (1967). The growth of lambs grazing on perennial ryegrass, tall fescue and cocksfoot, with and without white clover, as related to the botanical and chemical composition of the pasture and pattern of fermentation in the rumen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 11–21.Google Scholar
Hegland, R. S., Lambert, M. R., Jacobson, N. L. & Payne, L. C. (1957). Effect of dietary and management factors on reflex closure of the oesophageal groove in the dairy calf. J. Dairy Sci. 40, 1107–13.Google Scholar
Hodgson, J. (1965). The effect of weaning treatment on the development of solid food intake in calves. Anim. Prod. 7, 7–17.Google Scholar
Khotoi, R. H. & Pickering, F. S. (1968). Nutrition of the milk-fed calf. I. Performance of calves fed on different levels of whole milk relative to body weight. N.Z. Jl agric. Res. 11, 227–36.Google Scholar
Little, C. O. & Mitchell, G. E. (1967). Abomasal vs. oral administration of proteins to wethers. J. Anim. Sci. 26, 411–13.Google Scholar
McClymont, G. L. (1967). Handbook of Physiology. Section 6: Alimentary Canal; volume I. Control of Food and Water Intake, pp. 129–37. Ed. Code, C. F.. Washington: Am. Physiological Soc.Google Scholar
Mylrea, P. J. (1966). Digestion of milk in young calves. II. The absorption of nutrients from the small intestine. Res. vet. Sci. 7, 394–406.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pryor, W. J. & Butterfield, R. M. (1967). Gross energetic efficiency of the edible carcase tissue growth of calves. Aust. vet. J. 43, 145–46.Google Scholar
Rickard, M. D. & Ternouth, J. H. (1965). The effect of the increased dietary volatile fatty acids on the morphological and physiological development of lambs with particular reference to the rumen. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65, 371–7.Google Scholar
Roy, J. H. B. (1964). The nutrition of intensively reared calves. Vet. Rec. 76, 511–26.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C, Smith, R. H., Henschel, M. J., Hill, W. B. & Porter, J. W. G. (1969). Carbohydrate utilisation in the pre-ruminant calf. Br. J. Nutr. 23, 333–41.Google Scholar
Tamate, H., McGilliard, A. D., Jacobson, N. L. & Getty, R. (1962). Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf. J. Dairy Sci. 45, 408–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ternouth, J. H. (1968). The effect of ruminal hyperosmolality upon voluntary food consumption. Proc. Aust. Soc. Anim. Prod. 7, 369–75.Google Scholar
Warner, R. G. & Flatt, W. P. (1965). In Physiology of Digestion in the Ruminant, pp. 24–38. Ed. Dougherty, R. W.. Washington: Butterworths.Google Scholar