Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:02:57.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of different proportions of hay and fortified rolled barley in the diet on digestible-energy value and urinary-energy excretion by cattle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

A. M. Raven
A. M. Raven
Affiliation:
Chemical and Animal Nutrition Research Division, Ministry of Agriculture for Northern Ireland, and the Agricultural Chemistry Department, Queen's University, Belfast
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A 6 x 6 Latin Square balance experiment was carried out using six Friesian steers, each of which initially weighed about 304 kg. The six treatments studied were an all-hay diet and five other diets containing 20,40,60,80 and 100 % of rolled barley fortified with mineral and vitamin supplements, accompanied by correspondingly reduced proportions of hay. Each diet was fed at an estimated maintenance level of feeding.

The progressive increase in the proportion of concentrate gave a significantly linear increase (P < 0·001) in both digestible and calculated metabolizable energy. The actual increase in digestible energy was from 2·62Mcal/kg dry matter (59·3% of the gross energy) on the all-hay treatment to 3·42 Mcal/kg dry matter (79·5% of the gross energy) on the all-concentrate treatment. Use of the determined digestible energy values for the all-hay and fortified barley diets to calculate the digestible energy of the four mixed diets gave results in reasonably good agreement with the determined values, the maximum difference being 0·12 Mcal/kg dry matter, which represented 3·83 % of the determined value. The losses of energy in the urine expressed as percentages of the gross energy of the diets showed a small but significantly linear decrease (P < 0·01) with increase in proportion of barley in the diet. The molar proportions of steamvolatile acids in samples of rumen fluid taken from two animals on each treatment indicated that increase in the proportion of concentrate was associated with tendencies for increase in acetic acid, decrease in propionic acid and little change in butyric acid. The mean digestibility of the organic matter was 62·6 % on the all-hay treatment and 81·8 % on the all concentrate treatment. The progressive increase in the proportion of concentrate gave a significantly linear increase (P < 0·001) in digestibility of the organic matter. Although intakes of nitrogen decreased with increase in the proportion of concentrate due to a decrease in the amount of dry matter fed, the weights of nitrogen retained were well maintained and when expressed as percentages of intake showed a significantly linear increase (P < 0·01).

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , August 1972 , pp. 99 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Paper, A. D. A. S. Advisory NO. 11 (1971). Nutrient Allowances and Composition of Feeding Stuffs for Ruminants. Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Publications), Tolcarne Drive, Pinner Middlesex HA5 2DT.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council, London (1965). The Nutrient Requirements of Farm Livestock. No. 2. Ruminants. Technical reviews and summaries.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. (1967). The efficiency of energy transformations in ruminants. European Association for Animal Production Publication No. 12. Energy Metabolism of Farm Animals, Proe. 4th Symposium held at Warsaw, Poland, September1967. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press Limited.Google Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Clapperton, J. L. (1965). Prediction of the amount of methane produced by ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 19, 511–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cowsert, R. L. & Montgomery, M. J. (1969). Effect of varying forage-to-concentrate ratio of isonitrogenous rations on feed intake by ruminants. J. Dairy Sci. 52, 64–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erwin, E. S., Marco, G. J. & Emery, E. M. (1961). Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas-chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44, 1768–71.Google Scholar
McDonald, P., Edwards, R. A. & Greenhalgh, J. F. D. (1966). Animal Nutrition. Edinburgh and London: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Raun, M. S. & Burroughs, W. (1962). Suction strainer technique in obtaining rumen fluid samples from intact lambs. J. Anim. Sci. 21, 454–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topps, J. H., Kay, R. N. B., Goodall, E. D., Whitelaw, F. G. & Reid, R. S. (1968). Digestion of concentrate and of hay diets in the stomach and intestines of ruminants. Br. J. Nutr. 22, 281–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed