Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:45:29.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of different nitrogenous fertilizers applied as solids or soluctions dry matter yields and niotrogen uptake by grass. Part II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. Z. Nowakowski ,
A. C. D. Newman  and
A. Penny
T. Z. Nowakowski
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. C. D. Newman
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
A. Penny
Affiliation:
Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Three field trials with Italian ryegrass showed that solid N fertilizers usually gave larger yields than solutions containing 5% N but the differences were significant in only three of thirteen comparisons. More N was taken up from solid fertilizers than from solutions; the differences were not significant at 561b N/acre but were at 1121b N/acre. Grass given solutions had smaller percentage of N and the differences in the percentage of N were significant in eight of ten comparisons. In pot experiments with Italian ryegrass, solutions containing 3.3% N were less effective than solid fertilizers, but solutions containing 1.8% N were equally effective. Possible causes of solutions being less effective are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 68 , Issue 1 , February 1967 , pp. 123 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cosway, E. J. & O'Malley, E. (1942). Miorodiffusion methods. Ammonia and urea using buffered absorbents (revised methods for ranges greater than 10 μg N). Biochem. J. 36, 655–61.Google Scholar
Eggleton, W. G. E. (1935). Assimilation of inorganic nitrogenous salts, including sodium nitrite by the grass plant. Biochem. J. 29, 1389–97.Google Scholar
Hoskins, J. L. (1944). An interchangeable micro and macro steam distillation apparatus. Analyst 69, 271.Google Scholar
Jameson, H. R. (1959). Liquid nitrogenous fertilizers. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 53, 333–8.Google Scholar
Nowakowski, T. Z. (1961). The effect of different nitrogenous fertilizers, applied as solids or solutions, on the yield and nitrate-N content of established grass and newly sown ryegrass. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 56, 287–92.Google Scholar
Pearsall, W. H. & Billimobia, M. C. (1937). Losses of nitrogen from green plants. Biochem. J. 31, 1743–50.Google Scholar
Pizer, N. H. (1957). Fertilizers in solutions. Proc. Fertil. Soc. no. 44, 1–42.Google Scholar
Tod, H. (1962). The use of gas liquor in agriculture. J. Sci. Fd Agric. 13, 338–43.Google Scholar
Van Slyke, D. D. (1912). J. biol. Chem. 12, 275, quoted by Pearsall, W. H. & Billimoria, M. C. (1937).Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1964). Nitrogen Lost When Solutions Burn Grass. Crops Soils, 16, no. 6, 22.Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1966). Efficiency of fertilizer urea as affected by method of application, soil moisture and lime. Agron. J. 58, 249–52.Google Scholar
Widdowson, F. V. & Penny, A. (1964). Experiments comparing liquid and solid fertilizers for grass and kale. Expl Husb. no. 10, pp. 97–100.Google Scholar