Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:23:47.417Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of date of application and form of nitrogen on herbage production in spring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

R. J. Stevens ,
H. I. Gracey ,
D. J. Kilpatrick ,
M. S. Camlin ,
D. G. O'Neill  and
W. McLaughlan
R. J. Stevens
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandFood and Agricultural Chemistry Research DivisionNewforge LaneBelfast BT9 5PX
H. I. Gracey
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandGreenmount College of Agriculture and HorticultureAntrim BT41 4PU
D. J. Kilpatrick
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandBiometrics DivisionNewforge LaneBelfast BT9 SPX
M. S. Camlin
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandPlant Testing StationCrossnacreevyBelfast BT6 9SM
D. G. O'Neill
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandEnniskillen Agricultural CollegeEnniskillen
W. McLaughlan
Affiliation:
Department of Agriculture for Northern IrelandEnniskillen Agricultural CollegeEnniskillen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Field plot experiments were carried out for 3 years at four sites to study the effect of date of application of ammonium nitrate/calcium carbonate (CAN) and urea (U) on perennial ryegrass production in spring. Fertilizer (70 kg N/ha) was applied at weekly intervals for 10 weeks from 1 February. Herbage was cut on the same day at all sites, 3–4 weeks after the last N application. CAN and U at 50 kg N/ha were immediately re-applied and a second cut of herbage was taken after 4–5 weeks. From meteorological data, the dates after 1 February when soil temperature at 100 mm depth increased to 5·5 °C and the dates when cumulative average daily air temperatures < 0 °C from 1 January reached 200 °C were calculated for each site and year.

The date of application for maximum dry matter (D.M.) yield at the first cut differed with site and year, but for 11 of the 12 site/years was in February. The number of dates of application resulting in optimum yield (i.e. at least 90% of the average maximum yield response to CAN or U) varied also with site and year from one to six. Soil and air temperature predictive systems implied a precision in choice of application date that was unjustified and were no more successful at predicting the optimum application date than a simple date range. The first fertilizer application had a pronounced positive residual effect on D.M. yields at the second cut. Less precision on date of the first application was required to obtain optimum cumulative yields over both cuts than optimum yield at the first cut only.

Differences in performance between CAN and U were only significant for three of the 120 fertilizer applications at the first cut. On these occasions, all in one year at two sites, U gave higher yields than CAN. Correlations were sought between D.M. yield response and growth period, air temperature, long-term rainfall and short-term rainfall for CAN and U separately. Factors relating to rainfall had no significant effect on response to U but response to CAN showed a significant negative correlation with short-term rainfall. The short-term weather forecast may therefore be another criterion to be considered in deciding when to apply N in early spring.

Type
Review
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 112 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 329 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baker, H. K. (1960). The production of early spring grass. 1. The effect of autumn management and different levels of nitrogenous manuring on the production of early spring grass from a general purpose ley. Journal of the British Grassland Society 15, 275–280.Google Scholar
Baker, R. D. (1986). Efficient use of nitrogen fertilisers. In Grassland Manuring (Eds Cooper, J. P. and Raymond, W. E.), pp. 15–27. Maidenhead: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Black, A. S., Sherlock, R. R. & Smith, N. P. (1987). Effect of timing of simulated rainfall on ammonia volatilization from urea, applied to soil of varying moisture content. Journal of Soil Science 38, 679–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackman, G. E. (1936). The influence of temperature and available nitrogen supply on the growth of pasture in the spring. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 26, 620–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Broadbent, F. E., Hill, G. N. & Tyler, K. B. (1958). Transformations and movement of urea in soils. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 22, 303–307.Google Scholar
Chaney, K. & Paulson, G. A. (1988). Field experiments comparing ammonium nitrate and urea top-dressing for winter cereals and grassland in the U.K. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 110, 285–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chin, W. & Kroontje, W. (1962). Mechanisms of urea adsorption by soils. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 26, 479–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarkson, D. T. & Warner, A. J. (1979). Relationships between root temperature and the transport of ammonium and nitrate ions by Italian and perennial ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum and Lolium perenne). Plant Physiology 64, 557–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, G. W. (1964). Nitrogen fertilisers: their place in food production, the forms which are made and their efficiencies. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society No. 80, 88 pp.Google Scholar
Court, M. N., Stephen, R. C. & Waid, J. S. (1964). Toxicity as a cause of the inefficiency of urea as a fertilizer. I. Review. Journal of Soil Science 15, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daly, M. & Mackenzie, G. H. (1983). The timing of spring nitrogen applications to grass. Grass and Forage Science 38, 149.Google Scholar
Fenn, L. B. & Hossner, L. R. (1985). Ammonia volatilization from ammonium or ammonium-forming nitrogen fertilizers. Advances in Soil Science 1, 123–169.Google Scholar
Grundmann, G. L. & Rolston, D. E. (1987). A water function approximation to degree of anaerobiosis associated with denitrification. Soil Science 144, 437–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hageman, R. H. (1984). Ammonium versus nitrate nutrition of higher plants. In Nitrogen in Crop Production (Ed. Hauck, R. D.), pp. 67–85. Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy.Google Scholar
Heddle, R. G. (1968). Nitrogenous fertilization of Italian ryegrass in spring. Journal of the British Grassland Society 23, 69–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herlihy, M. & O'Keeffe, W. F. (1987). Evaluation and model of temperature and rainfall effects on response to N sources applied to grassland in spring. Fertilizer Research 13, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jagtenberg, W. D. (1970). Predicting the best time to apply nitrogen to grassland in spring. Journal of the British Grassland Society 25, 266–271.Google Scholar
Keatinge, J. D. H., Stewart, R. H. & Garrett, M. K. (1979). The influence of temperature and soil water potential on the leaf extension rate of perennial ryegrass in Northern Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 175–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, J. S. V., McConaghy, S., Coey, W. E. & Kerr, J. A. M. (1965). The effects of different nitrogen treatments on the spring growth of ryegrass. I. Effects on yield and nitrogen content of the herbage. Record of Agricultural Research, Ministry of Agriculture Northern Ireland 14 (2), 15–29.Google Scholar
McCullough, I. I. (1976). Effect of rate and time of application of nitrogen fertiliser on the growth of grass in spring and grass nitrate nitrogen content. Record of Agricultural Research, Department of Agriculture Northern Ireland 24, 49–54.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1981). Analysis of Agricultural Materials. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (1983). Lime and fertiliser recommendations No. 5. Grass and Forage Crops 1983/84. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
Murphy, W. E. (1983). Comparing urea and CAN at different locations. Farm and Food Research 14, 41–43.Google Scholar
Postmus, J. & Schepers, J. H. (1980). Temperature sum and date of spring application of nitrogen on grassland – results in the Netherlands. In The Role of Nitrogen in Intensive Grassland Production (Eds Prins, W. H. and Arnold, G. H.), p. 159. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Ryden, J. C. (1984). The flow of nitrogen in grassland. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society No. 229, 44 pp.Google Scholar
Sexstone, A. J., Parkin, T. B. & Tiedje, J. M. (1985). Temporal response of soil denitrification rates to rainfall and irrigation. Soil Science Society of America, Proceedings 49, 99–103.Google Scholar
Smettem, K. R. J., Trudgill, S. T. & Pickles, A. M. (1983). Nitrate loss in soil drainage waters in relation to by-passing flow and discharge on an arable site. Journal of Soil Science 34, 499–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, R. J. (1988). Some factors influencing the efficiency of fertiliser nitrogen for grass production in spring. In Nitrogen Efficiency in Agricultural Soils (Eds Jenkinson, D. S. and Smith, K. A.) pp. 177–190. London: Elsevier Applied Science.Google Scholar
Swift, G. (1983). A prediction system for timing of nitrogen for spring grass. In Efficient Grassland Farming (Ed. Corrall, A. J.), pp. 331–332. Maidenhead: British Grassland Society.Google Scholar
Swift, G., Mackie, C. K., Harkess, R. D. & Franklin, M. F. (1985). Time of fertiliser nitrogen for spring grass. The Scottish Agricultural Colleges, Research and Development Note 24.Google Scholar
Thomas, G. W. & Phillips, R. E. (1979). Consequences of water movement in macropores. Journal of Environmental Quality 8, 149–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomlinson, T. E. (1970). Urea – agronomic applications. Proceedings of the Fertiliser Society No. 113, 76 pp.Google Scholar
Van Burg, P. F. J., Dilz, K. & Prins, W. H. (1982). Agricultural value of various nitrogen fertilizers. Results of research in the Netherlands and elsewhere in Europe. Netherlands Nitrogen Technical Bulletin No. 13, 51 pp.Google Scholar
Volk, G. M. (1959). Volatile loss of ammonia following surface application of urea to turf or bare soils. Agronomy Journal 51, 746–749.Google Scholar
Watson, C. J. (1986). Preferential uptake of ammonium nitrogen from soil by ryegrass under simulated spring conditions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 171–177.Google Scholar
Watson, C. J. & Adams, S. N. (1986). Effect of simulated wet spring conditions on the relative efficiency of three forms of nitrogen fertilizer on grassland. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 107, 219–222.Google Scholar