Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:29:58.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of contrasting tillage procedures on the emergence of onions in relation to measured physical properties of seed beds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

P. F. North
P. F. North
Affiliation:
Soils Division, Rothamsted Experimental Station, Harpenden, Herts, AL5 2JQ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

A new tillage procedure was examined for the improvement in physical environment it might provide during the establishment of a vegetable crop, particularly in a dry spring. This procedure, of cultivating the soil mainly in autumn, was compared with the conventional method of cultivating in the spring on a sandy loam soil. The physical condition of seed beds prepared by the two methods was assessed by in situ measurements of soil temperature, water retention characteristics, hydraulic conductivity and surface roughness. Plant responses were compared by monitoring the emergence of onion seeds. Dry spring conditions were simulated by sheltering some plots from rain.

Final emergence, emergence time and rate of emergence were all superior following autumn cultivation for both dry and wet seed beds. The major factor affecting emergence was the coarseness of the seed bed which influenced the mechanical impedance to shoot growth. Differences in soil temperature between treatments were small, as were hydraulic conductivities under dry conditions. Preparing a seed bed in autumn rather than spring resulted in a good tilth with lower mechanical strength. This minimized the constraints on emergence when soil strength increased under dry conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 108 , Issue 3 , June 1987 , pp. 671 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bullock, P., Newman, A. C. D. & Thomasson, A. J. (1985). Porosity aspects of the regeneration of soil structure after compaction. Soil and Tillage Research 5, 325–341.Google Scholar
Collins, G., Stibbe, E. & Kroesbergen, B. (1984). Influence of soil moisture stress and soil bulk density on the imbibition of corn seeds in a sandy soil. Soil and Tillage Research 4, 361–370.Google Scholar
Collis-George, N. & Hector, J. B. (1966). Germination of seeds as influenced by matric potential and by area of contact between seed and soil water. Australian Journal of Soil Research 4, 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collis-George, N. & Lloyd, J. E. (1979). The basis for a procedure to specify soil physical properties of a seedbed for wheat. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 30, 831–846.Google Scholar
Collis-George, N. & Williams, J. (1968). Comparison of the effects of soil matric potential and isotropic effective stress on the germination of Lactuca sativa. Australian Journal of Soil Research 6, 179–192.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. S. (1957). Studies of the growth of cereals on seedbeds prepared by dry sieving of the soil. Empire Journal of Experimental Agriculture 25, 167–185.Google Scholar
Greacen, E. L. (1981). Soil Water Assessment by the Neutron Method. Victoria: CSIRO.Google Scholar
Hammerton, J. L. (1961). Studies of the effects of soil aggregate size on the emergence and growth of beet (Beta vulgaris L.). I. Seedling emergence. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 56, 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hay, R. K. M., Holmes, J. C. & Hunter, E. A. (1978). The effects of tillage, direct drilling and nitrogen fertiliser on soil temperature under a barley crop. Journal of Soil Science 29, 174–183.Google Scholar
Hay, R. K. M. & Tunnicliffe Wilson, G. (1982). Leaf appearance and extension in field-grown winter wheat plants: the importance of soil temperature during vegetative growth. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 99, 403–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hegarty, T. W. & Royle, S. M. (1978). Soil impedance as a factor reducing crop seedling emergence, and its relation to soil conditions at sowing, and to applied water. Journal of Applied Ecology 15, 897–904.Google Scholar
Hillel, D., Krentos, V. D. & Stylianou, Y. (1972). Procedure and test of an internal drainage method for measuring soil hydraulic conductivity characteristics in situ. Soil Science 114, 395–400.Google Scholar
Johnson, W. H. & Henry, J. E. (1964). Influence of simulated row compaction on seedling emergence and soil drying rates. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 7, 252–255.Google Scholar
North, P. F. & Brown, N. J. (1982). The effect on some field-measured soil physical properties of restructuring a soil mechanically. Proceedings of 9th International Soil Tillage Research Organization Conference, Osijek, 1982, pp. 505–510.Google Scholar
North, P. F. & Brown, N. J. (1983). Some field instruments suitable for the automated measurement of thermal and hydraulic properties of soil. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 101, 411–422.Google Scholar
North, P. F. & Brown, N. J. (1986). A mist irrigation system for use in hydraulic conductivity measurements on small field plots. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 33, 51–55.Google Scholar
Rathore, T. R., Ghildyal, B. P. & Sachan, R. S. (1983). Effect of surface crusting on emergence of soyabean (Glycine max L. Merr.) seedlings. I. Influence of aggregate size in the seedbed. Soil and Tillage Research 3, 111–121.Google Scholar
Rose, C. W., Stern, W. R. & Drummond, J. E. (1965). Determination of hydraulic conductivity as a function of depth and water content for soil in situ. Australian Journal of Soil Research 3, 1–9.Google Scholar
Rowse, H. R. & Goodman, D. (1984). Drilling vegetables into autumn-cultivated soil with a low ground pressure vehicle: effects on timeliness and soil compaction. Journal of Soil Science 35, 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowse, H. R. & Stone, D. A. (1978). Simulation of the water distribution in soil. I. Measurement of soil hydraulic properties and the model for an uncropped soil. Plant and Soil 49, 517–531.Google Scholar
Rowse, H. R., Stone, D. A. & Goodman, D. (1985). Soil cultivation: seedbed cultivations. National Vegetable Research Station Annual Report for 1984, pp. 128–130.Google Scholar
Rowse, H. R., Stone, D. A. & Greenwood, D. J. (1984). Cultivations, drilling and compaction control in vegetable cropping. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 29, 215–221.Google Scholar
Weaver, K. N. (1980). Field emergence of calabrese and onion seedlings in response to compaction treatments on the soil surface or at seed depth. Journal of Horticultural Science 55, 325–332.Google Scholar
Whitfield, W. A. D. (1974). The soils of the National Vegetable Research Station, Wellesbourne. Report of the National Vegetable Research Station for 1973, pp. 21–30.Google Scholar