Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-vrt8f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T03:59:14.092Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production: 2. Spring defoliation of Dactylis glomerata: the fate of reproductive tillers which are cut, but whose stem apex is retained

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

I. Davies
Affiliation:
Welsh Plant Breeding Station, Aberystwyth

Summary

Early stages in the development of reproductive tillers of cocksfoot were studied in uncut swards, and in regrowth after cuts taken at a critical stage.

In uncut swards, initial stages of stem extension (up to 10 cm) occurred over 3 weeks. During this period the last three or four leaves initiated on the tiller became visible externally. Tillers with stems of less than 2 cm generally had one or two partially emerged blades. Those with stems 2–6 cm long carried two, three or, occasionally, four partially emerged blades; the sheaths of two, and sometimes three of these leaves extended beyond the stem apex. Hence, for tillers with 2–6 cm stems, even lenient defoliation involving the removal of only one expanded blade would result in the severance of a further two, three or four developing leaves; at an earlier stage only one or two developing leaves would be severed.

In the regrowth studies it was found that defoliation of reproductive tillers whose apices were below cutting height and which, at the time of cutting, had stems of up to 8 cm, led to contrasting effects: some made only negligible regrowth, whilst others made rapid extension growth. Some of the most rapidly extending tillers retained no leaf blades, and therefore the alternative effects of defoliation cannot be completely explained in terms of leaf retention. Other possible mechanisms contributing to these effects are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davies, I. (1969). The influence of management on tiller development and herbage growth. Technical Bulletin Welsh Plant Breeding Station, no. 3.Google Scholar
Davies, I. (1973). Regrowth characteristics of an S.23 perennial ryegrass sward defoliated at early stages of reproductive development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 80, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, I. (1976). Developmental characteristics of grass varieties in relation to their herbage production. 1. An analysis of high-digestibility varieties of Dactylis glomerata at three stages of development. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 87, 2532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmond, D. B. (1966). The influence of animal treading on pasture growth. Proceedings 10th International Grassland Congress, Helsinki, pp. 453–8.Google Scholar
Etter, A. G. (1951). How Kentucky bluegrass grows. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 38, 293375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewiss, O. R. (1972). Tillering in grasses – its significance and control. Journal British Grassland Society 27, 6582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar