Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:22:01.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The development of the digestive system of the young animal I. Tissue weights, dry matter of tissues, total acidity and chloride content of stomach contents in the young pig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

D. M. Walker
D. M. Walker
Affiliation:
Royal Veterinary College, Camden Town, London, N. W. 1
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. A total of forty pigs (four litters) were slaughtered at weekly intervals from birth to 5 weeks of age.

2. Results are given for the changes in weight of different parts of the digestive organs and their contents with increasing age, and for the content of NaCl and of total acidity in the stomach contents.

3. Stomach pH was on average more alkaline than pH 3.4 at all ages up to 5 weeks; the average pH of the duodenum was 6.5 and of the small intestine 6.4.

4. Total NaCl and total acidity in stomach contents remained roughly constant from birth up to 5 weeks of age. No free HCl was detected in any of the stomach contents of the pigs.

5. The consistency of the stomach contents varied with the age of the pig; the hard milk clot which was characteristic of the contents at 2–3 weeks of age appeared softer and more broken in older pigs.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , June 1959 , pp. 352 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bailey, C. B., Kitts, W. D. & Wood, A. J. (1956). Canad. J. Agric. Sci. 36, 51.Google Scholar
Braude, R. (1957). Outlook on Agriculture, 1, 175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braude, R., Mitchell, K. G., Dollar, A. M., Porter, J. W. G. & Walker, D. M. (1958). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 17, xlix.Google Scholar
Cunningham, H. M. & Brisson, G. J. (1957 a). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, H. M. & Brisson, G. J. (1957 b). J. Anim. Sci. 16, 574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollar, A. M., Mitchell, K. G. & Porter, J. W. G. (1957). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 16, xii.Google Scholar
Hawk, P. B., Oser, B. L. & Summerson, W. H. (1951). Practical Physiological Chemistry, 12th ed.London.Google Scholar
Hudman, D. B., Friend, D. W., Hartman, P. A., Ashton, G. C. & Catron, D. V. (1957). Agric. Fd Chem. 5, 691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, E. J. (1951). Micro-analysis in Medical Biochemistry, 2nd ed.London.Google Scholar
Kitts, W. D., Bailey, C. B. & Wood, A. J. (1956). Canad. J. Agric. Sci. 36, 45.Google Scholar
Manners, M. J. & McCrea, M. R. (1958). Agric. Rev. 3, no. 10, 37.Google Scholar