Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-lvwk9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T19:08:41.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The development of barley grain: comparisons between cultivars for growth rate and α-amylase activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

T. J. Riggs
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge
P. G. Gothard
Affiliation:
Plant Breeding Institute, Trumpington, Cambridge

Summary

Grains from ears of known anthesis time in seven spring barley cultivars were measured for dry weight and α-amylase activity at regular intervals during grain maturation. During the period 10–31 days after anthesis, dry weight increase of the grain was found to be substantially linear in all the cultivars. Comparisons between linear slopes fitted for this phase of growth were found to provide an objective means of comparing grain growth rates in different cultivars.

α-Amylase activity per grain reached a peak in all except one cultivar at between 10 and 16 days after anthesis but declined rapidly during the linear phase of grain growth. α-Amylase activity per gram grain dry weight decreased exponentially during this period and transformation of the data to logarithms allowed a substantially linear fit to be made. Slopes for each of the cultivars were compared.

Differences were found between cultivars in grain growth rates, total α-amylase activity and rates of fall of α-amylase activity per gram for the period 10–31 days after anthesis. No relationship could be found between grain growth rate and either the absolute level of α-amylase activity achieved in the grain or the rate of fall in activity during development.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, M. J., Ellis, R. P. & Swanston, J. S. (1974). Tissue distribution of α-amylase and phosphorylase in developing barley grain. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 80, 488–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffus, C. M. (1969). α-Amylase activity in the developing barley grain and its dependence on gibberellio acid. Phytochemistry 8, 1205–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Scott, R. K. (1976). Barley and its environment. VI. Growth and development in relation to yield. Journal of Applied Ecology 13 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins, L. D., Loney, D. P. & Meredith, P. (1974). Periodicity of growth and starch deposition in the developing wheat grain. Cereal Chemistry 51, 718–33.Google Scholar
La Berge, D. E., Macgregor, A. W. & Meredith, W. O. S. (1971). Changes in alpha- and beta-amylase activities during the maturation of different barley cultivars. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 51, 469–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacGregor, A. W., Gordon, A. G., Meredith, W. O. S. & Lacroix, L. (1972). Site of α-amylase in developing barley kernels. Journal of the Institute of Brewing 78, 174–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meredith, P. & Jenkins, L. D. (1970). The weight of the mature wheat grain. Planta 94, 233–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meredith, P. & Jenkins, L. D. (1973). Amylases of developing wheat, barley and oat grains. Cereal Chemistry 50, 245–54.Google Scholar
Smith, D. B. (1970): An automatic method for the determination of a-amylase activity in cereal extracts. Technicon Food and Beverage Meeting, 11 11 1970.Google Scholar
Sprent, P. (1969). Models in regression and related topics. London: Methuen, p. 26.Google Scholar
Stoddart, J. L. (1971). Sequential changes in amylase isozymes during grain maturation in barley. Planta 97, 7082.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walpole, P. R. & Morgan, D. G. (1971). A quantitative study of grain filling in three cultivars of Hordeum vitlgare L. Annals of Botany 35, 301–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar