Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T22:16:20.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting blood cells of chickens

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

L. G. Chubb  and
J. G. Rowell
L. G. Chubb
Affiliation:
Houghton Poultry Research Station, Houghton, Huntingdon
J. G. Rowell
Affiliation:
A.R.C. Statistics Group, School of Agriculture, University of Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Six methods of diluting chicken's blood prior to counting erythrocytes and leucocytes in haemacytometers have been studied. No difficulty is found in recognizing erythrocytes. The most satisfactory method of counting leucocytes was the method described by Natt & Herrick (1952) in which the diluent contains methyl violet. Formulae are given which enable standard errors of estimates to be calculated.

2. Three methods of staining blood smears for the differentiation of the various leucocytes have been studied. The method using Leishman's stain appeared to result in good differentiation and was simple to use. However, an experiment to study sampling errors has shown that there may be considerable differences between observers in the percentages of lymphocytes and heterophils when the latter are high, showing that the estimates of these quantities may be biassed. These differences may have been caused by a tendency for heterophils to concentrate to the edges of the smears and for the observers to select different fields for their counts.

3. Although blood counts varied only slightly during the day, there were considerable differences from day to day. The average erythrocyte count for ten chickens fluctuated between about 2·9 and 3·5 millions per mm.3 during the first 3 weeks after hatching and was more steady for the next 4 weeks at about 2·9 millions per mm.3. The average leucocyte count rose from about 10,000 to 35,000 per mm.3 during the first 7 weeks of life, the rate of increase being greatest when the chickens were youngest; the rise was mainly due to a rise in the number of lymphocytes.

4. There were also considerable differences in blood counts between chickens even though environmental and genetic conditions were standardized as far as possible.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 52 , Issue 2 , April 1959 , pp. 263 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1959

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albritton, E. C. (1951). Standard Values in Blood. Washington: National Research Council.Google Scholar
Biggs, R. & Macmillan, R. L. (1948). J. Clin. Path. 1, 269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blain, D. (1928). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 25, 594.Google Scholar
Berkson, J., Magath, T. B. & Hurn, M. (1935). J. Amer. Statist. Ass. 30, 414.Google Scholar
Burmester, B. R., Severens, J. M. & Roberts, E. (1941). Poult. Sci. 20, 391.Google Scholar
Cook, F. W. & Dearstyne, R. S. (1934). Tech. Bull. N.C. Agric. Exp. Sta. no. 44.Google Scholar
Cook, S. F. (1937). Poult. Sci. 16, 291.Google Scholar
Dacie, J. V. (1956). Practical Haematology, 2nd ed.London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Darcel, C. Le Q. (1950). Stain Tech. 26 57.Google Scholar
Darmady, E. M. & Davenport, S. G. T. (1954). Haematological Technique, 1st ed.London: J. and A. Churchill Ltd.Google Scholar
Denington, E. M. & Lucas, A. M. (1955). Poult. Sci. 34, 360.Google Scholar
Hairston, M. A. (1955). Stain Tech. 30, 148.Google Scholar
Lucas, A. M. & Denington, E. M. (1958). Poult. Sci. 37, 544.Google Scholar
Lucas, A. M. & Jamroz, C. (1959). Atlas of Avian Haematology. U.S. Dep. Agric. Monogr. no. 25 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Magath, T. B., Berkson, J. & Hurn, M. (1936). Amer. J. Clin. Path. Tech. Suppl. 6, 568.Google Scholar
Natt, M. P. & Herrick, C. A. (1952). Poult. Sci. 31, 735.Google Scholar
Natt, M. P. & Herrick, C. A. (1954). Poult. Sci. 33, 828.Google Scholar
Olson, C. Jnr., (1935). J. Amer. Vet. Med. Ass. 86, 474.Google Scholar
Olson, C. Jnr., (1937). Cornell Vet. 27, 235.Google Scholar
Olson, C. Jnr., (1952). Diseases of Poultry. Iowa: H. E. Bester and L. H. Schwarte.Google Scholar
Ram, T. & Hutt, F. B. (1955). Amer. J. Vet. Res. 16, 437.Google Scholar
Scarborough, R. A. (1931). Yale J. Biol. Med. 4, 202.Google Scholar
Schermer, S. (1954). Die Blutmorphologie der Laboratoriumstiere. Leipzig: J. A. Barth Verlag.Google Scholar
Sturkie, P. D. (1954). Avian Physiology. London: Baillière, Tindall and Cox.Google Scholar
Turner, M. E. & Eadie, G. S. (1957). Biometrics, 13, 485.Google Scholar
Twisselmann, N. M. (1939). Poult. Sci. 18, 151.Google Scholar
Wintrobe, M. M. (1952). Clinical Haematology, 3rd ed.London: Henry Kimpton.Google Scholar
Wirth, D. (1950). Grundlagen einer klinischen Hämatologic der Haustiere. Wien und Innsbruck: Urban u. Schwarzenberg.Google Scholar
Wiseman, B. K. (1931). Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., N.Y., 28, 1031.Google Scholar