Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T23:16:46.625Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cotton crop environment, growth and yield in the Sudan Gezira: II. The causes of variation in yield from year to year

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. E. Jackson
J. E. Jackson
Affiliation:
Gezira Research Station, Wad Medani, Sudan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

At three sites in the Sudan Gezira the variations in seed cotton yields between 1941 and 1961 were due, in the main, to variations in insect pest damage and, at one site only, to a downward trend in soil nitrogen level.

At each site seed cotton yield was predetermined by total plant top dry weight before the opening of the first cotton bolls. The cotton crop was sown in August. At Turabi in the northern Gezira and at the Gezira Research Station in the south-central Gezira, variations in plant growth up to early October had little effect on subsequent yield. The yield was determined by growth during October, November and December; the total top dry weight at the end of December was much more important than the pattern of growth by which this weight was attained. At these sites yield was much more closely dependent on the amount of leaf recorded as free from pest and disease damage than on total leaf weight. Damage due to jassid (Empoasca lybica), thrips (Caliothrips spp.) and leaf curl accounted for 69% of the year to year yield variation at Turabi. Damage due to jassid and thrips accounted for 56% of the year-to-year variation at the Gezira Research Station.

Severe pest damage was associated with low July plus August rains and high temperatures during the growing season but was not found to be dependent on leaf nitrogen levels.

At Hag Abdulla in the southern Gezira, there was a general downward trend in yields over the years as well as variation from year to year consequent on variations in thrips damage. The downward trend inyields was associated with a trend to lower soil nitrate and plant nitrogen levels which resulted in anearlier cessation of leaf growth in recent years than hitherto.

Variation in the level of pest attack accounted for 61% of the year-to-year variation in nitrogen response at Turabi, while at Hag Abdulla the response to nitrogen was determined by the deleterious effect of thrips and by a trend to increasing response as natural soil nitrate levels declined.

Gezira commercial crop yields were closely correlated with those of the appropriate experimental plots for the years considered (r = 0·859 for the S-type crop, 0·736 for the L-type crop) inspite of some differences in cultural practice. This suggests that the major causes of variation were the same in both cases and that adequate protection against insect pests should do much to prevent the recurrence of seasons of extremely low yield with their serious economic consequences.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 72 , Issue 2 , April 1969 , pp. 169 - 184
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Balls, W. L. (1953). The Yields of a Crop. London: Spon.Google Scholar
Beam, , (1911). Soil of the Gezira, 4th Rep. Well. Trop. Res. Labs., 45–59.Google Scholar
Boughey, A. S. (1944). Physiological cotton wilt in the Sudan Gezira. Ann. appl. Biol. 31, 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burhan, H. O. & Mansi, M. G. (1967). Rotation responses of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. I. The effect of crop rotation on cotton yields. J.agric. Sci., Camb. 68, 255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, G. H. & Bedford, H. W. (1948). Quoted in Agriculture in theSudan, ed. Tothill, , p. 503. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cowland, J. W. (1947). The cotton jassid Empoasca lybica (de Berg.) in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan and experiments on its control. Bull. ent. Res. 38, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cowland, J. W. & Edwabds, C. J. (1949/1950). Control of Empoasca lybica (de Berg.) on cotton in the Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Bull. ent. Res. 40, 83–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, F. (1934). Studios in growth analysis of the cotton plant under irrigation in the Sudan. I. The effects of different combinations of nitrogen applications and water-supply. Ann. Bot. 48, 877–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, F. (1941). Studies in growth analysis of the cotton plant under irrigation in the Sudan. II. Seasonal variation in development and yield. Ann. Bot. N.S. 5, 509–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, F. (1948). A review of experimental work. Tothill, J. D. ed., Agriculture in the Sudan, pp. 439–562. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hanna, A. D. (1950/1951). The effect of rainfall on the cotton jassid Empoasca lybica (de Berg.) in the Gezira, Anglo-Egyptian Sudan. Bull. ent. Res. 41, 359–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, L. C. (1961). Introduction. Prog. Rep. Exp. Stn. Sudan 1960–61. Emp. Cott. Gr. Corp., p. 1.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E. (1964). Between season variation in yield in relation to pest attack in the Sudan Gezira. Proc. 12 Int. Congr. Ent. London 1964, 612–13.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E. (1967). Studies on the sowing dates of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. I. The influence of date of sowing on plant growth and development. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 305–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E. (1969) Cotton crop environment, growth and yield in the Sudan Gezira. I. The Gezira observation plots: experimental design, cultural methods and yield analysis. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 72, 159–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E. & Burhan, H. O. (1968). Rotation responses of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. II. The effects of fertilizer nitrogen on the response to rotation. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 70, 257–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E., Faulkner, R. C. & Razoux, L. (1965). Effect of jassid attack on cotton yield and quality in the Sudan Gezira. Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 42, 295–9.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. E., Fatulkner, R. C. & Razoux, L. (1967). Studies on the sowing dates of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. III. The effect of sowing date on yield and quality under different fertilizer and spraying treatments. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 329–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. E., Faulkner, R. C. & Roy, D. K. D. (1962). Studies in the quality of Gezira cottons. II. The effect of site nitrogen and spacing on seed cotton grade. Emp. J. exp. Agric. 30, 207–14.Google Scholar
Jewitt, T. N. (1950). Field nitrates in Gezira soil. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 40, 160–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1959). Recent Progress in Entomological Research in the Sudan Gezira. Emp. Cott. Grow. Rev. 36, 179–86.Google Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1959/1960). The yield response of cotton in Sudan Gezira to DDT spray. Bull. ent. Res. 50, 567–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, R. J. V. (1961). Some factors affecting numbers of Empoasca lybica (de Berg). (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) infesting cotton in the Sudan Gezira. Bull. ent. Res. 52, 191–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomas, D. (1958). Sudan Government, Annual Report of the Research Division for 1957/58. Entomology Section.Google Scholar
Michelmore, A. P. G. (1930). Observations on leafhoppers (Homoptera, Fam. Jassidae) in the Gezira in 1929. Sudan Govt. Well. Trop. Res. Labs. Bull. No. 31. Ent. Sect. pp. 64–6.Google Scholar
Proctor, J. H. (1964). Sudan Government. Annual Report of the Research Division for 1963/64. Entomology Section.Google Scholar
Proctor, J. H. & Amin, El Tigani El (1963). Spraying experiments Progr. Rep. Exp. Stns. Sudan 1962/63. Emp. Gott. Or. Corp. p. 28.Google Scholar
Razotux, L., Jackson, J. E., & Faulkner, R. C. (1967). Studies on the sowing date of cotton in the Sudan Gezira. II. The relationship between sowing date of cotton and the incidence of insect pests. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 69, 317–27.Google Scholar
Rose, M. F. (1958). Survey of the season. Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas. Sudan 1957/58, Emp. Gott. Grow. Corp., pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
Rose, M. F. (1959). Survey of the season. Progr. Rep. Exp. Stas. Sudan 1958/59. Emp. Cott. Grow. Corp., pp. 3–5.Google Scholar
Rushton, S. (1951). On least squares fitting by orthonormal polynomials using the Choleski method. J. R. statist. Soc. Ser. B. 13, 92–9.Google Scholar
Snow, O. W. & Taylor, J. (1952/1953). The large scale control of the cotton jassid in the Gezira and White Nile areas of the Sudan. Bull. Ent. Res. 43, 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toms, A. M. (1959). Some recent trends in cotton yields in the Sudan Gezira. Emp. Gott. Grow. Rev. 36, 5–11.Google Scholar