Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T02:51:27.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of ovulation in the cow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

J. Hammond  and
P. Bhattacharya
J. Hammond
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge University
P. Bhattacharya
Affiliation:
School of Agriculture, Cambridge University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Cows and heifers were injected shortly before slaughter with an extract of horse pituitary or with pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin.

2. These substances were administered at different times of the cycle or in pregnancy; various doses were given simultaneously with removal of the corpus luteum.

3. A series of animals were given 1500 or 5000 i.u. at intervals from 5 days before to 3 days after expression of the corpus luteum; up to thirty ovulations were so obtained.

4. A small number of cows have been treated and left to calve; there have been several twin and triplet births.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , January 1944 , pp. 1 - 15
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1944

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bhattacharya, P., Hammond, J. Jnr, & Day, F. T. (1941). Vet. Rec. 33, 450.Google Scholar
Casida, L. E., Nalbandov, A., McShan, W. H., Meyer, R. K. & Wisnicky, W. (1940). Amer. Soc. Anim. Prod. 33, 302.Google Scholar
Chance, M., Rowlands, I. W. & Young, F. G. (1939). J. Endocrinol. 1, 239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, H. H. & Miller, R. F. (1933). Amer. J. Physiol. 104, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, J. (1927). The Physiology of Reproduction in the Cow. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. (1939). Vet. Rec. 31, 1137.Google Scholar
Hammond, J. Jnr, Hammond, J. & Parkes, A. S. (1942). J. Agric. Sci. 32, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, A. C. T. (1934). J. Dairy Res. 5, 101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johansson, I. (1932). Z. Zücht. B, 24, 183.Google Scholar
Rimmington, C. & Rowlands, I. W. (1941). Biochem. J. 35, 736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robson, J. M. (1937). J. Physiol. 90, 435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westman, A. & Jacobsohn, D. (1937). Acta obstet. gynec. scand. 17, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M. & Eskin, I. A. (1937). Bull. Biol. Med. Exp. Moscow, 4, 200.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M. & Eskin, I. A. (1939). Trud. Dinam. Razvit. 11, 112.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M., Eskin, I. A. & Ovsjannikov, G. F. (1935). Trud. Dinam. Razvit. 9, 75.Google Scholar
Zawadowsky, M. M., Vunder, P. A., Padootcheva, A. L. & Margvelashvili, S. G. (1935). Trud. Dinam. Razvit. 9, 21.Google Scholar